Literature DB >> 10481120

Force-feedback grasper helps restore sense of touch in minimally invasive surgery.

M MacFarlane1, J Rosen, B Hannaford, C Pellegrini, M Sinanan.   

Abstract

The age of minimally invasive surgery has brought forth astounding changes in the health care field. Less pain and quicker patient recovery have been demonstrated with several types of operations that were once performed by an open technique. With these changes have come reports of complications. The decreased sense of touch is just one of several limitations inherent to current techniques of minimally invasive surgery that limit detection of subtle or unapparent lesions on palpation, such as common duct stones and liver lesions. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the ability of a force-feedback-equipped grasper to restore some of the sense of touch that is lost in minimally invasive surgery. To demonstrate this ability, we created six silicone phantoms of identical dimensions but graded compliance, and asked 10 subjects to place them in increasing/decreasing order of compliance. They used three tools (their dominant gloved hand, a standard laparoscopic Babcock grasper, and our force-feedback device fitted with the identical Babcock grasper) to rate the compliance of the samples in a blinded fashion. These conditions thus approximated the conditions of open surgery, minimally invasive surgery, and minimally invasive surgery fitted with a force-sensing device, in terms of palpating tissues. Five surgeons skilled in minimally invasive surgery and five nonsurgeons participated in the study. The results indicate that the force-feedback device is significantly (P <0.05) better than a standard Babcock grasper at rating tissue compliance, but was not as successful as a gloved hand (mean of squared errors = 1.06, 3. 15, and 0.25, respectively). There was no significant difference between surgeons and nonsurgeons in rating compliance. We conclude that this force-feedback instrument is able to partially restore the sense of touch in minimally invasive surgery. This restored ability may thus potentially result in more efficient operations with improved diagnostic capabilities and fewer complications during minimally invasive surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10481120     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(99)80069-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  19 in total

1.  Reduced postoperative hospitalization after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P A Grace; A Quereshi; J Coleman; R Keane; G McEntee; P Broe; H Osborne; D Bouchier-Hayes
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Improved staging of liver tumors using laparoscopic intraoperative ultrasound.

Authors:  D J Barbot; J H Marks; R I Feld; J B Liu; F E Rosato
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome.

Authors:  V Mais; S Ajossa; S Guerriero; M Mascia; E Solla; G B Melis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a university hospital.

Authors:  G R Goodman; J G Hunter
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Three-dimensional imaging in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  W P Griffin
Journal:  Biomed Instrum Technol       Date:  1995 May-Jun

6.  Mechanism, management, and prevention of laparoscopic bowel injuries.

Authors:  P Schrenk; R Woisetschläger; R Rieger; W Wayand
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a matched study.

Authors:  J R Sanabria; P A Clavien; R Cywes; S M Strasberg
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  3-D vision technology applied to advanced minimally invasive surgery systems.

Authors:  R M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is less expensive than open Belsey Mark IV.

Authors:  W S Laycock; M Oddsdottir; A Franco; K Mansour; J G Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Patient satisfaction following laparoscopic and open antireflux surgery.

Authors:  D W Rattner; D C Brooks
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1995-03
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Recent in vivo surgical robot and mechanism developments.

Authors:  M E Rentschler; D Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Natural orifice surgery with an endoluminal mobile robot.

Authors:  Mark E Rentschler; Jason Dumpert; Stephen R Platt; Shane M Farritor; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Effects of experience on force perception threshold in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  M Zhou; J Perreault; S D Schwaitzberg; C G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Effects of laparoscopic instrument and finger on force perception: a first step towards laparoscopic force-skills training.

Authors:  M S Raghu Prasad; M Manivannan; S M Chandramohan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Blended shared control utilizing online identification : Regulating grasping forces of a surrogate surgical grasper.

Authors:  Trevor K Stephens; Nathan J Kong; Rodney L Dockter; John J O'Neill; Robert M Sweet; Timothy M Kowalewski
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Finger-attachment device for the feedback of gripping and pulling force in a manipulating system for brain tumor resection.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Chinbe; Takeshi Yoneyama; Tetsuyou Watanabe; Katsuyoshi Miyashita; Mitsutoshi Nakada
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Auditory force feedback substitution improves surgical precision during simulated ophthalmic surgery.

Authors:  Nathan Cutler; Marcin Balicki; Mark Finkelstein; Jiangxia Wang; Peter Gehlbach; John McGready; Iulian Iordachita; Russell Taylor; James T Handa
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Freeform fabrication of tissue-simulating phantom for potential use of surgical planning in conjoined twins separation surgery.

Authors:  Shuwei Shen; Haili Wang; Yue Xue; Li Yuan; Ximing Zhou; Zuhua Zhao; Erbao Dong; Bin Liu; Wendong Liu; Barrett Cromeens; Brent Adler; Gail Besner; Ronald X Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.