Literature DB >> 29594693

Quality of information on the Internet-has a decade made a difference?

Jeyanthi Kulasegarah1, Kassandra McGregor2, Murali Mahadevan2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While patients accessing the Internet can be a positive step towards health literacy and self-efficacy, these resources vary in quality. AIMS: In 2007, Kulasegarah et al. assessed the information available to patients on the Internet on three common ENT procedures (tonsillectomy, septoplasty, and myringoplasty), looking at the quality of the information in terms of completeness and accuracy. This is a follow-on study to examine how this information has changed after 10 years.
METHODS: Following a Google search, the top 20 webpages on each of the three ENT procedures, tonsillectomy, septoplasty, and myringoplasty, were analyzed.
RESULTS: Webpages gave on average 50.6% of the critical information a patient should know prior to undergoing surgery. This is a drop from 2007 (65.5%). Over 96.8% were found to have no inaccuracies identified on the available information provided on the websites. This was slightly higher than in 2007 (94.7%). YouTube (10%) and hospital webpages (10%) were among the new subcategories that were not present in the 2007 study.
CONCLUSIONS: Due to the reduced completeness of information available to patients online, it is important that health professionals direct patients to appropriate websites if they wish to do their own research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Completeness; Health; Information; Internet

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29594693     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-018-1790-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  7 in total

1.  Can YouTube enhance student nurse learning?

Authors:  Andrew Clifton; Claire Mann
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.442

2.  The quality of information on three common ENT procedures on the Internet.

Authors:  J Kulasegarah; M Harney; M Walsh; R M Walsh
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Exposure to mass media health information, skin cancer beliefs, and sun protection behaviors in a United States probability sample.

Authors:  Jennifer Hay; Elliot J Coups; Jennifer Ford; Marco DiBonaventura
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  YouTube as a source of information on rhinosinusitis: the good, the bad and the ugly.

Authors:  T C Biggs; J H Bird; P G Harries; R J Salib
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 1.469

5.  YouTube as a source of patient information on gallstone disease.

Authors:  Jun Suh Lee; Ho Seok Seo; Tae Ho Hong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  What do web-use skill differences imply for online health information searches?

Authors:  Markus A Feufel; S Frederica Stahl
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  eHealth literacy: extending the digital divide to the realm of health information.

Authors:  Efrat Neter; Esther Brainin
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 5.428

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Reasons for (not) choosing dental treatments-A qualitative study based on patients' perspective.

Authors:  Susanne Felgner; Marie Dreger; Cornelia Henschke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to nasal septoplasty.

Authors:  Elysia M Grose; Connor P Holmes; Kaishan A Aravinthan; Vincent Wu; John M Lee
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-03-17

3.  An investigation of the information provided to the parents of young people with mental health needs on an internet forum.

Authors:  Elif Mertan; Lauren Croucher; Roz Shafran; Sophie D Bennett
Journal:  Internet Interv       Date:  2020-12-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.