Literature DB >> 23866821

YouTube as a source of information on rhinosinusitis: the good, the bad and the ugly.

T C Biggs1, J H Bird, P G Harries, R J Salib.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: YouTube is an internet-based repository of user-generated content. This study aimed to determine whether YouTube represented a valid and reliable patient information resource for the lay person on the topic of rhinosinusitis.
METHODS: The study included the first 100 YouTube videos found using the search term 'sinusitis'. Videos were graded on their ability to inform the lay person on the subject of rhinosinusitis.
RESULTS: Forty-five per cent of the videos were deemed to provide some useful information. Fifty-five per cent of the videos contained little or no useful facts, 27 per cent of which contained potentially misleading or even dangerous information. Videos uploaded by medical professionals or those from health information websites contained more useful information than those uploaded by independent users.
CONCLUSION: YouTube appears to be an unreliable resource for accurate and up to date medical information relating to rhinosinusitis. However, it may provide some useful information if mechanisms existed to direct lay people to verifiable and credible sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23866821     DOI: 10.1017/S0022215113001473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  15 in total

1.  The Reliability of Bariatric Surgery Videos in YouTube Platform.

Authors:  Hasan Erdem; Abdullah Sisik
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Quality of information on the Internet-has a decade made a difference?

Authors:  Jeyanthi Kulasegarah; Kassandra McGregor; Murali Mahadevan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  YouTube videos as health decision aids for the public: An integrative review.

Authors:  Kimberly Haslam; Heather Doucette; Shauna Hachey; Teanne MacCallum; Denise Zwicker; Martha Smith-Brilliant; Robert Gilbert
Journal:  Can J Dent Hyg       Date:  2019-02-01

4.  YouTube as a Source of Information on Echocardiography: Content and Quality Analysis.

Authors:  Ercan Aydın; Emre Yılmaz
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.672

5.  YouTube as a source of patient information on gallstone disease.

Authors:  Jun Suh Lee; Ho Seok Seo; Tae Ho Hong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  YouTube as a source of information on breast cancer in the Arab world.

Authors:  Georges Ayoub; Elie Chalhoub; Ghassan Sleilaty; Hampig Raphael Kourie
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of Intragastric Balloon Videos on YouTube.

Authors:  Akin Calisir; Ilhan Ece
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  An assessment of professionalism on students' Facebook profiles.

Authors:  K N Nason; H Byrne; G J Nason; B O'Connell
Journal:  Eur J Dent Educ       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.355

9.  YouTube Videos Related to Skin Cancer: A Missed Opportunity for Cancer Prevention and Control.

Authors:  Corey H Basch; Charles E Basch; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Rachel Reeves
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2015-03-02

10.  Fiction, Falsehoods, and Few Facts: Cross-Sectional Study on the Content-Related Quality of Atopic Eczema-Related Videos on YouTube.

Authors:  Simon M Mueller; Valentina N S Hongler; Pierre Jungo; Lucian Cajacob; Simon Schwegler; Esther H Steveling; Zita-Rose Manjaly Thomas; Oliver Fuchs; Alexander Navarini; Kathrin Scherer; Oliver Brandt
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.