Literature DB >> 22200968

The quality of information on three common ENT procedures on the Internet.

J Kulasegarah1, M Harney, M Walsh, R M Walsh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Internet hosts a large number of high-quality medical resources and poses seemingly endless opportunities to inform, teach, and connect professionals and patients alike. However, it is difficult for the lay person to distinguish accurate from inaccurate information. AIM: This study was undertaken in an attempt to assess the quality of information on otolaryngology available on the Internet.
METHODS: Sixty appropriate websites, using search engines Yahoo and Google, were evaluated for completeness and accuracy using three commonly performed ENT operations: tonsillectomy (T), septoplasty (S), and myringoplasty (M).
RESULTS: A total of 60 websites were evaluated (NT = 20, NM = 20, NS = 20). A total of 86.7% targeted lay population and 13.3% targeted the medical professionals. 35% of the sites included all critical information that patients should know prior to undergoing surgery and over 94% of these were found to contain no inaccuracies. Negative bias towards medical profession was detected in 3% of websites.
CONCLUSIONS: In the current climate, with informed consent being of profound importance, the Internet represents a useful tool for both patients and surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22200968     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-011-0787-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  7 in total

Review 1.  Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review.

Authors:  P Kim; T R Eng; M J Deering; A Maxfield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-06

2.  Pediatric surgery on the Internet: is the truth out there?

Authors:  L E Chen; R K Minkes; J C Langer
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 3.  Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel?

Authors:  A R Jadad; A Gagliardi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-02-25       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Otolaryngology and the Internet. E-mail and the World Wide Web.

Authors:  M A Rothschild
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Digital dialogue. Sharing information and interests on the Internet.

Authors:  R Peters; R Sikorski
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware.

Authors:  W M Silberg; G D Lundberg; R A Musacchio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Computer-based patient education.

Authors:  K R Murphy
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.346

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Quality of information on the Internet-has a decade made a difference?

Authors:  Jeyanthi Kulasegarah; Kassandra McGregor; Murali Mahadevan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Characterizing the Processes for Navigating Internet Health Information Using Real-Time Observations: A Mixed-Methods Approach.

Authors:  Susan L Perez; Debora A Paterniti; Machelle Wilson; Robert A Bell; Man Shan Chan; Chloe C Villareal; Hien Huy Nguyen; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 5.428

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.