Literature DB >> 25024025

Bilateral clubfeet are highly correlated: a cautionary tale for researchers.

Kelly Gray1, Paul Gibbons, David Little, Joshua Burns.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Congenital talipes equinovarus, or clubfoot, is a common pediatric orthopaedic condition of unknown origin. In many clubfoot clinical trials, interventions are assigned to a patient, but response to treatment is assessed separately in each foot. Trials commonly report x patients with y feet where y is greater than x (eg, 35 patients with 56 feet). However, common statistical tests assume that each data point is independent. Although data from unilateral cases of clubfoot are independent, it is unknown if each foot of patients with bilateral clubfeet are correlated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation in the feet of patients with bilateral clubfeet by (1) evaluating the degree of severity between lower limbs of each patient with bilateral clubfeet at baseline; (2) determining if right and left feet of each patient responded to intervention in the same way; (3) determining the proportion of bilateral relapse; and (4) determining the proportion of right and left feet which required the same intervention to correct bilateral relapse.
METHODS: We performed a chart review of the records of 33 patients with bilateral clubfeet (66 feet). Baseline severity was assessed using the Pirani score. The number of Ponseti serial casts to correct the deformity, the proportion of patients who underwent bilateral Achilles tenotomy, the proportion of bilateral relapse, and the treatment to correct bilateral relapse were examined.
RESULTS: The degree of severity between right (Pirani score mean, 5.2; SD, 0.8) and left (Pirani score mean, 5.2; SD, 0.5) feet for each patient at baseline was highly correlated (r=0.76, p<0.001). Response to intervention between lower limbs was highly correlated for the number of Ponseti casts required for initial correction (right mean, 5.2, SD, 1.1; left mean, 5.2, SD, 1.3) (r=0.89, p<0.001) and the proportion of patients who underwent bilateral Achilles tenotomy (right, 17/18; left, 16/18) (r=0.94, p<0.001). In the nine patients who experienced relapse, eight experienced bilateral involvement. In all cases of bilateral relapse, the right and left foot of each patient required the same intervention to correct the relapse.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with bilateral clubfeet, baseline severity, response to initial Ponseti treatment, Achilles tenotomy, and relapse outcomes were highly correlated in the right and left feet of each patient. Pooling clinical results of patients who present with bilateral clubfeet is statistically inappropriate, since results in two limbs of the same patient do not represent independent observations. These results support analogous work in other specialties suggesting that patients with bilateral presentations should not be analyzed as independent data points. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25024025      PMCID: PMC4182368          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3776-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  17 in total

Review 1.  How many patients? How many limbs? Analysis of patients or limbs in the orthopaedic literature: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dianne Bryant; Thomas C Havey; Robin Roberts; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  The role of the Pirani scoring system in the management of club foot by the Ponseti method.

Authors:  P J Dyer; N Davis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-08

3.  Two knees or one person: data analysis strategies for paired joints or organs.

Authors:  A J Sutton; K R Muir; A C Jones
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Symmetry of foot alignment and ankle flexibility in paediatric Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

Authors:  Joshua Burns; Robert Ouvrier; Tim Estilow; Rosemary Shy; Matilde Laurá; Kate Eichinger; Francesco Muntoni; Mary M Reilly; Davide Pareyson; Gyula Acsadi; Michael E Shy; Richard S Finkel
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Shall we count numbers of eyes or numbers of subjects?

Authors:  F Ederer
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1973-01

7.  Genetic and epidemiological studies of clubfoot in Hawaii. General and medical considerations.

Authors:  C S Chung; R W Nemechek; I J Larsen; G H Ching
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1969       Impact factor: 0.444

8.  A South Australian population-based study of congenital talipes equinovarus.

Authors:  R Byron-Scott; P Sharpe; C Hasler; P Cundy; C Hirte; A Chan; H Scott; P Baghurst; E Haan
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.980

9.  Seasonal distribution of idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus in Scotland.

Authors:  Simon L Barker; Malcolm F Macnicol
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Surgical versus Ponseti approach for the management of CTEV: a comparative study.

Authors:  Catherine M Duffy; Jose J Salazar; Lee Humphreys; Brona C McDowell
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2013 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.324

View more
  11 in total

1.  Bilateral clubfeet: Two feet or one patient.

Authors:  Anil Agarwal; Nargesh Agrawal; Neeraj Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-08-12

2.  Comparison of Dimeglio and Pirani score in predicting number of casts and need for tenotomy in clubfoot correction using the Ponseti method.

Authors:  Manuele Lampasi; Caterina Novella Abati; Camilla Bettuzzi; Stefano Stilli; Giovanni Trisolino
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Orthotic configuration and its effect on clubfoot: A bench research with modifications of orthotic bar length, dorsiflexion and abduction.

Authors:  Anil Agarwal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-02-12

4.  Initiating Ponseti management in preterm infants with clubfoot at term age.

Authors:  Emily Scanlan; Kate Grima-Farrell; Emre IIhan; Paul Gibbons; Kelly Gray
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 1.917

Review 5.  Relapses in clubfoot treated with Ponseti technique and standard bracing protocol- a systematic analysis.

Authors:  Anil Agarwal; Anuj Rastogi; Prateek Rastogi
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-02

6.  Anthropometric measurements in Ponseti treated clubfeet.

Authors:  Anil Agarwal; Anuj Rastogi
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2018-05-25

7.  Plantar Pressure Distribution of Right and Left Foot in Bilateral Clubfoot Treated by Ponseti Method: A Correlation Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Chao Xu; Yong-Gang Zhu; Ya-Bo Yan; Lu-Yu Huang; Wei Lei
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-05-22

8.  Plantar pressure changes in hindfoot relief devices of different designs.

Authors:  F Mazur; B Swoboda; H D Carl; C Lutter; M Engelhardt; M W Hoppe; T Hotfiel; C Grim
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2019-02-07

9.  Gait in 5-year-old children with idiopathic clubfoot: A cohort study of 59 children, focusing on foot involvement and the contralateral foot.

Authors:  Elin Lööf; Hanneke Andriesse; Marie André; Stephanie Böhm; Eva W Broström
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  The Correlation of Pirani and Dimeglio Scoring Systems for Ponseti Management at Different Levels of Deformity Severity.

Authors:  Hua Fan; Yubin Liu; Li Zhao; Caiting Chu; Yongyu An; Tingting Wang; Wenhua Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.