| Literature DB >> 29594218 |
Rachel Glicksman1,2, Naz Chaudary3, Melania Pintilie4, Eric Leung5,2, Blaise Clarke6,7, Kieyan Sy6,7, Richard P Hill1,3,2,8, Kathy Han1,2, Anthony Fyles1,2, Michael Milosevic1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Keywords: Cervical cancer; Hypoxia; Immuno-oncology; Interstitial fluid pressure (IFP); Neutrophils; Radiation treatment
Year: 2017 PMID: 29594218 PMCID: PMC5862663 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2017.08.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol ISSN: 2405-6308
Patient characteristics.
| Attribute | Group | All eligible patients ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age | Median and range (cm) | 51.1 (19.5–78.7) |
| FIGO Stage | IB/IIA | 93 (32%) |
| IIB/IIIA | 97 (34%) | |
| IIIB | 97 (34%) | |
| Histology | Squamous | 224 (78%) |
| Adenocarcinoma | 40 (14%) | |
| Other | 23 (8%) | |
| Tumor Size (Missing n = 8) | <5 cm | 95 (34%) |
| ≥5 cm | 184 (66%) | |
| Pelvic Lymph Node Status | Negative | 190 (66%) |
| Positive | 97(34%) | |
| Hemoglobin Concentration | ≤120 g/l | 93 (32%) |
| >120 g/l | 194 (68%) | |
| Treatment Type | RT alone | 90 (31%) |
| RT + cisplatin (RTCT) | 197 (69%) | |
| HP5 (Missing | Median and range (%) | 55 (0–99) |
| IFP (Missing | Median and range (mmHg) | 18 (−3 to 59) |
| Baseline ANC (Missing | Median and range (×109/L) | 5.2 (0.9–19.5) |
| Nadir ANC (Missing | Median and range (×109/L) | 2.5 (0.3–8.5) |
FIGO, International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians.
IFP, Interstitial fluid pressure.
RT, Radiotherapy.
RTCT, Radiotherapy + weekly cisplatin.
Fig. 1Box plots for absolute neutrophil count (ANC) at baseline and weekly during external beam RT. The nadir ANC during external beam RT is also shown. The plots show the median value, first and third quartile values, 1.5 times the interquartile range and outlying data points.
Fig. 2Kaplan–Meier disease free survival (DFS) curves for baseline (left) and nadir (right) ANCs in all patients, divided into three equally sized groups. The hazard ratios (HRs) and p-values were obtained using the Cox proportional hazard model with baseline and nadir ANC as continuous variables.
Multivariate disease-free survival models stratified by hypoxia.
| Attribute | HR (95% CI) for DFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tumor Size | 1.03 (0.86–1.23) | 0.73 |
| Pelvic Lymph Node Status | 1.75 (0.9–3.42) | 0.1 |
| Treatment (RTCT vs. RT) | 1.75 (0.96–3.22) | 0.067 |
| Baseline ANC | 1.05 (0.95–1.16) | 0.34 |
| Tumor Size | 1.23 (1.04–1.47) | 0.018 |
| Pelvic Lymph Node Status | 1.71 (1.02–2.85) | 0.041 |
| Treatment (RTCT vs. RT) | 1.45 (0.83–2.56) | 0.18 |
| Baseline ANC | 1.01 (0.92–1.11) | 0.84 |
| Tumor Size | 1.05 (0.88–1.25) | 0.58 |
| Pelvic Lymph Node Status | 1.81 (0.96–3.42) | 0.069 |
| Treatment (RTCT vs. RT) | 1.33 (0.71–2.5) | 0.36 |
| Nadir ANC | 1.45 (1.17–1.81) | 0.00079 |
| Tumor Size | 1.21 (1.02–1.43) | 0.03 |
| Pelvic Lymph Node Status | 1.71 (1.02–2.86) | 0.043 |
| Treatment (RTCT vs. RT) | 1.30 (0.71–2.33) | 0.4 |
| Nadir ANC | 0.92 (0.72–1.18) | 0.53 |
ANC, Absolute neutrophil count.
HR, Hazard ratio.
HP5 RTCT, Hypoxic percentage Radiotherapy + weekly cisplatin.
RT, Radiotherapy.
Positive vs. negative.
Fig. 3Kaplan–Meier disease free survival (DFS) curves for oxic (left), high IFP (middle) and oxic + high IFP tumors (right) stratified by nadir ANC. Oxic tumors had HP5 ≤55%. High IFP was defined as >18 mmHg. Nadir ANC was analyzed as a continuous variable using the Cox proportional hazard model but, for illustrative purposes, displayed as three equally sized groups. The hazard ratios (HRs) and p-values were obtained from the Cox model after adjusting for important clinical covariates and treatment type.
Multivariate disease-free survival models stratified by IFP.
| Attribute | HR (95% CI) for DFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tumor Size | 1.31 (1.06–1.63) | 0.013 |
| Pelvic Lymph Node Status | 1.26 (0.69–2.3) | 0.45 |
| Treatment (RTCT vs. RT) | 1.34 (0.7–2.56) | 0.38 |
| Baseline ANC | 0.94 (0.84–1.04) | 0.23 |
| Tumor Size | 0.96 (0.82–1.12) | 0.6 |
| Pelvic Lymph Node Status | 2.36 (1.36–4.08) | 0.0022 |
| Treatment (RTCT vs. RT) | 0.43 (0.25–0.73) | 0.0017 |
| Baseline ANC | 1.08 (0.99–1.18) | 0.071 |
| Tumor Size | 1.27 (1.04–1.56) | 0.022 |
| Pelvic Lymph Node Status | 1.34 (0.74–2.43) | 0.33 |
| Treatment (RTCT vs. RT) | 1.34 (0.68–2.65) | 0.39 |
| Nadir ANC | 0.96 (0.74–1.26) | 0.79 |
| Tumor Size | 0.99 (0.85–1.16) | 0.91 |
| Pelvic Lymph Node Status | 2.72 (1.53–4.84) | 0.00069 |
| Treatment (RTCT vs. RT) | 0.55 (0.31–0.97) | 0.039 |
| Nadir ANC | 1.51 (1.22–1.85) | 0.0001 |
ANC, Absolute neutrophil count.
HR, Hazard ratio.
IFP, Interstitial fluid pressure.
RT, Radiotherapy.
RTCT, Radiotherapy + weekly cisplatin.
Positive vs. negative.