Literature DB >> 11230656

Metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: detection with MR imaging and FDG PET.

M J Reinhardt1, C Ehritt-Braun, D Vogelgesang, C Ihling, S Högerle, M Mix, E Moser, T M Krause.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with that of positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-[fluorine 18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Before radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in 35 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB or II cervical cancer, abdominal FDG-PET and MR imaging were performed. Malignancy criteria were a lymph node diameter of 1 cm or more at MR imaging and a focally increased FDG uptake at PET. The findings of FDG-PET and MR imaging were compared with histologic findings.
RESULTS: Histologic examination revealed pN0-stage cancer in 24 patients and pN1-stage cancer in 11 patients. On a patient basis, node staging resulted in sensitivities of 0.91 with FDG-PET and 0.73 with MR imaging and specificities of 1.00 with FDG-PET and 0.83 with MR imaging. The positive predictive value (PPV) of FDG-PET was 1.00 and that of MR imaging, 0.67 (not significant). The metastatic involvement of lymph node sites was identified at FDG-PET with a PPV of 0.90; at MR imaging, 0.64 (P <.05, Fisher exact test).
CONCLUSION: Metabolic imaging with FDG-PET is an alternative to morphologic MR imaging for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11230656     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr19776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  41 in total

1.  The impact of image fusion in resolving discrepant findings between FDG-PET and MRI/CT in patients with gynaecological cancers.

Authors:  Cheng-Chien Tsai; Chien-Sheng Tsai; Koon-Kwan Ng; Chyong-Huey Lai; Swei Hsueh; Pan-Fu Kao; Ting-Chang Chang; Ji-Hong Hong; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-08-21       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  [18]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for the Textural Features of Cervical Cancer Associated with Lymph Node Metastasis and Histological Type.

Authors:  Wei-Chih Shen; Shang-Wen Chen; Ji-An Liang; Te-Chun Hsieh; Kuo-Yang Yen; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Node-by-node correlation between MR and PET/CT in patients with uterine cervical cancer: diffusion-weighted imaging versus size-based criteria on T2WI.

Authors:  Eugene K Choi; Jeong Kon Kim; Hyuck Jae Choi; Seong Ho Park; Bum-Woo Park; Namkug Kim; Jae Seung Kim; Ki Chun Im; Gyunggoo Cho; Kyoung-Sik Cho
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MRI for detection of pelvic metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  G Shen; H Zhou; Z Jia; H Deng
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Accuracy of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of lymph node involvement in cervix carcinoma.

Authors:  Massimo Bellomi; Guido Bonomo; Fabio Landoni; Gaetano Villa; Maria E Leon; Luca Bocciolone; Angelo Maggioni; Giuseppe Viale
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Anatomic distribution of [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose-avid lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Hiral P Fontanilla; Ann H Klopp; Mary E Lindberg; Anuja Jhingran; Patrick Kelly; Vinita Takiar; Revathy B Iyer; Charles F Levenback; Yongbin Zhang; Lei Dong; Patricia J Eifel
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-03-30

7.  Accuracy of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with uterine cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Koji Murakami; Erena Yamasaki; Yasushi Kaji; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance lymphography in gynaecological malignancies.

Authors:  Noor Jahan; Priya Narayanan; Andrea Rockall
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  Anatomic distribution of fluorodeoxyglucose-avid para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Vinita Takiar; Hiral P Fontanilla; Patricia J Eifel; Anuja Jhingran; Patrick Kelly; Revathy B Iyer; Charles F Levenback; Yongbin Zhang; Lei Dong; Ann Klopp
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  [Whole-body tumor staging: MRI or FDG-PET/CT?].

Authors:  G Antoch; F M Vogt; A Bockisch; S G Ruehm
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.