Literature DB >> 27134181

Image guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: Improved pelvic control and survival in RetroEMBRACE, a multicenter cohort study.

Alina Sturdza1, Richard Pötter2, Lars Ulrik Fokdal3, Christine Haie-Meder4, Li Tee Tan5, Renaud Mazeron4, Primoz Petric6, Barbara Šegedin6, Ina Maria Jurgenliemk-Schulz7, Christel Nomden7, Charles Gillham8, Orla McArdle8, Erik Van Limbergen9, Hilde Janssen9, Peter Hoskin10, Gerry Lowe10, Ekkasit Tharavichitkul11, Elena Villafranca12, Umesh Mahantshetty13, Petra Georg1, Kathrin Kirchheiner1, Christian Kirisits1, Kari Tanderup3, Jacob Christian Lindegaard3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Image guided brachytherapy (IGBT) for locally advanced cervical cancer allows dose escalation to the high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) while sparing organs at risk (OAR). This is the first comprehensive report on clinical outcome in a large multi-institutional cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From twelve centres 731 patients, treated with definitive EBRT±concurrent chemotherapy followed by IGBT, were analysed. Kaplan-Meier estimates at 3/5years were calculated for local control (LC, primary endpoint), pelvic control (PC), overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS). In 610 patients, G3-4 late toxicity (CTCAEv3.0) was reported.
RESULTS: Median follow up was 43months, percent of patients per FIGO stage IA/IB/IIA 22.8%, IIB 50.4%, IIIA-IVB 26.8%. 84.8% had squamous cell carcinomas; 40.5% lymph node involvement. Mean EBRT dose was 46±2.5Gy; 77.4% received concurrent chemotherapy. Mean D90 HRCTV was 87±15Gy (EQD210), mean D2cc was: bladder 81±22Gy, rectum 64±9Gy, sigmoid 66±10Gy and bowel 64±9Gy (all EQD23). The 3/5-year actuarial LC, PC, CSS, OS were 91%/89%, 87%/84%, 79%/73%, 74%/65%. Actuarial LC at 3/5years for IB, IIB, IIIB was 98%/98%, 93%/91%, 79%/75%. Actuarial PC at 3/5years for IB, IIB, IIIB was 96%/96%, 89%/87%, 73%/67%. Actuarial 5-year G3-G5 morbidity was 5%, 7%, 5% for bladder, gastrointestinal tract, vagina.
CONCLUSION: IGBT combined with radio-chemotherapy leads to excellent LC (91%), PC (87%), OS (74%), CSS (79%) with limited severe morbidity.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Image guided brachytherapy; Locally advanced cervical cancer; Outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27134181     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  148 in total

1.  Outcomes of Computed Tomography-Guided Image-Based Interstitial Brachytherapy for Cancer of the Cervix Using GEC-ESTRO Guidelines.

Authors:  Karthik S Rishi; Ram Charith Alva; Amrit Raghav Kadam; Sanjiv Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-03-18

Review 2.  Review of strategies for MRI based reconstruction of endocavitary and interstitial applicators in brachytherapy of cervical cancer.

Authors:  José Richart; Vicente Carmona-Meseguer; Teresa García-Martínez; Antonio Herreros; Antonio Otal; Santiago Pellejero; Ana Tornero-López; José Pérez-Calatayud
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-07-23

Review 3.  The future of image-guided radiotherapy will be MR guided.

Authors:  Julianne M Pollard; Zhifei Wen; Ramaswamy Sadagopan; Jihong Wang; Geoffrey S Ibbott
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Comparison of outcomes for MR-guided versus CT-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in women with locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  Sophia C Kamran; Matthias M Manuel; Linda P Cho; Antonio L Damato; Ehud J Schmidt; Clare Tempany; Robert A Cormack; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Adjuvant hysterectomy after radiochemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Peter Hass; Holm Eggemann; Serban Dan Costa; Atanas Ignatov
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 6.  Imaging-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: the main process and common techniques.

Authors:  Zhongshan Liu; Yangzhi Zhao; Yunfeng Li; Jing Sun; Xia Lin; Tiejun Wang; Jie Guo
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.166

7.  Moving Forward in Cervical Cancer: Enhancing Susceptibility to DNA Repair Inhibition and Damage, an NCI Clinical Trials Planning Meeting Report.

Authors:  Matthew M Harkenrider; Merry Jennifer Markham; Don S Dizon; Anuja Jhingran; Ritu Salani; Ramy K Serour; Jean Lynn; Elise C Kohn
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Analysis of radiotherapy-induced alteration of CD8+ T cells and PD-L1 expression in patients with uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yasumasa Mori; Hiro Sato; Takuya Kumazawa; Tiara Bunga Mayang Permata; Yuya Yoshimoto; Kazutoshi Murata; Shin-Ei Noda; Takuya Kaminuma; Ken Ando; Takahiro Oike; Noriyuki Okonogi; Kohei Okada; Sangeeta Kakoti; Keiji Suzuki; Hayato Ikota; Hideaki Yokoo; Takashi Nakano; Tatsuya Ohno; Atsushi Shibata
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Brachytherapy for cervical cancer in septate uterus: Dose-volume differences with tandem implant placement in right vs. left uterine canal: A case report.

Authors:  Naoya Ishibashi; Toshiya Maebayashi; Takuya Aizawa; Masakuni Sakaguchi; Takehiro Nakao; Masahiro Okada
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  The role and contribution of treatment and imaging modalities in global cervical cancer management: survival estimates from a simulation-based analysis.

Authors:  Zachary J Ward; Surbhi Grover; Andrew M Scott; Sungmin Woo; Dina H Salama; Elizabeth C Jones; Tarek El-Diasty; Bradley R Pieters; Edward L Trimble; H Alberto Vargas; Hedvig Hricak; Rifat Atun
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 41.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.