Literature DB >> 29594183

Patient-specific cardiac phantom for clinical training and preprocedure surgical planning.

Justin Laing1, John Moore2, Reid Vassallo3, Daniel Bainbridge4, Maria Drangova1,2,3, Terry Peters1,2,3.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive mitral valve repair procedures including MitraClip® are becoming increasingly common. For cases of complex or diseased anatomy, clinicians may benefit from using a patient-specific cardiac phantom for training, surgical planning, and the validation of devices or techniques. An imaging compatible cardiac phantom was developed to simulate a MitraClip® procedure. The phantom contained a patient-specific cardiac model manufactured using tissue mimicking materials. To evaluate accuracy, the patient-specific model was imaged using computed tomography (CT), segmented, and the resulting point cloud dataset was compared using absolute distance to the original patient data. The result, when comparing the molded model point cloud to the original dataset, resulted in a maximum Euclidean distance error of 7.7 mm, an average error of 0.98 mm, and a standard deviation of 0.91 mm. The phantom was validated using a MitraClip® device to ensure anatomical features and tools are identifiable under image guidance. Patient-specific cardiac phantoms may allow for surgical complications to be accounted for preoperative planning. The information gained by clinicians involved in planning and performing the procedure should lead to shorter procedural times and better outcomes for patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-D printing; atria; cardiac; minimally invasive; molding; patient-specific; surgical planning

Year:  2018        PMID: 29594183      PMCID: PMC5866251          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.2.021222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  30 in total

Review 1.  Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence.

Authors:  William C McGaghie; S Barry Issenberg; Elaine R Cohen; Jeffrey H Barsuk; Diane B Wayne
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  See one, do one, teach one--is this still how it works? A comparison of the medical and nursing professions in the teaching of practical procedures.

Authors:  W T M Mason; P W Strike
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  A dual-chamber, thick-walled cardiac phantom for use in cardiac motion and deformation imaging by ultrasound.

Authors:  B Lesniak-Plewinska; S Cygan; K Kaluzynski; J D'hooge; J Zmigrodzki; E Kowalik; M Kordybach; M Kowalski
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 4.  Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Nicolas Martelli; Carole Serrano; Hélène van den Brink; Judith Pineau; Patrice Prognon; Isabelle Borget; Salma El Batti
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Finite element modeling of the left atrium to facilitate the design of an endoscopic atrial retractor.

Authors:  S R Jernigan; G D Buckner; J W Eischen; D R Cormier
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  3D Printed Cardiac Phantom for Procedural Planning of a Transcatheter Native Mitral Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Richard L Izzo; Ryan P O'Hara; Vijay Iyer; Rose Hansen; Karen M Meess; S V Setlur Nagesh; Stephen Rudin; Adnan H Siddiqui; Michael Springer; Ciprian N Ionita
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-04-05

7.  3-D finite element modelling of facial soft tissue and preliminary application in orthodontics.

Authors:  Si Chen; Hangdi Lou; Liang Guo; Qiguo Rong; Yi Liu; Tian-Min Xu
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 1.763

8.  A mitral annulus tracking approach for navigation of off-pump beating heart mitral valve repair.

Authors:  Feng P Li; Martin Rajchl; John Moore; Terry M Peters
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Three-dimensional printed models in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Massimiliano Cantinotti; Israel Valverde; Shelby Kutty
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Stereolithographic models for surgical planning in congenital heart surgery.

Authors:  Ralf Sodian; Stefan Weber; Mathias Markert; Darius Rassoulian; Ingo Kaczmarek; Tim C Lueth; Bruno Reichart; Sabine Daebritz
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  4 in total

1.  3D Printing Low-Stiffness Silicone Within a Curable Support Matrix.

Authors:  Taylor E Greenwood; Serah E Hatch; Mark B Colton; Scott L Thomson
Journal:  Addit Manuf       Date:  2020-10-31

2.  Biomimetic phantom with anatomical accuracy for evaluating brain volumetric measurements with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Mehran Azimbagirad; Felipe Wilker Grillo; Yaser Hadadian; Antonio Adilton Oliveira Carneiro; Luiz Otavio Murta
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-01-29

3.  Demonstration of Use of a Novel 3D Printed Simulator for Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair (TEER).

Authors:  Michele Bertolini; Michael Mullen; Georgios Belitsis; Angel Babu; Giorgio Colombo; Andrew Cook; Aigerim Mullen; Claudio Capelli
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 4.  Recent advances on the development of phantoms using 3D printing for imaging with CT, MRI, PET, SPECT, and ultrasound.

Authors:  Valeria Filippou; Charalampos Tsoumpas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.071

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.