Literature DB >> 33718006

3D Printing Low-Stiffness Silicone Within a Curable Support Matrix.

Taylor E Greenwood1, Serah E Hatch1, Mark B Colton1, Scott L Thomson1.   

Abstract

Embedded 3D printing processes involve extruding ink within a support matrix that supports the ink throughout printing and curing. In once class of embedded 3D printing, which we refer to as "removable embedded 3D printing," curable inks are printed, cured, then removed from the uncured support matrix. Removable embedded 3D printing is advantageous because low-viscosity inks can be patterned in freeform geometries which may not be feasible to create via casting and other printing processes. When printing solid-infill geometries, however, uncured support matrix becomes trapped within the prints, which may be undesirable. This study builds on previous work by formulating a support matrix for removable embedded 3D printing that cures when mixed with the printed silicone ink to solve the problem of trapped, uncured support matrix within solid-infill prints. Printed specimens are shown to have a nearly isotropic elastic modulus in directions perpendicular and parallel to the printed layers, and a decreased modulus and increased elongation at break compared to specimens cast from the ink. The rheological properties of the support matrix are reported. The capabilities of the printer and support matrix are demonstrated by printing a variety of geometries from four UV and addition-cure silicone inks. Shapes printed with these inks range by nearly two orders of magnitude in stiffness and have failure strains between approximately 50 and 250%, suggesting a wide range of potential applications for this printing process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  additive manufacturing; removable embedded 3D printing; silicone 3D printing; ultra-low stiffness silicone; ultra-soft 3D printing

Year:  2020        PMID: 33718006      PMCID: PMC7946128          DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addit Manuf        ISSN: 2214-7810


  45 in total

1.  Use of silicone materials to simulate tissue biomechanics as related to deep tissue injury.

Authors:  Jessica L Sparks; Nicholas A Vavalle; Krysten E Kasting; Benjamin Long; Martin L Tanaka; Phillip A Sanger; Karen Schnell; Teresa A Conner-Kerr
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.347

Review 2.  Printing soft matter in three dimensions.

Authors:  Ryan L Truby; Jennifer A Lewis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Liquid-like Solids Support Cells in 3D.

Authors:  Tapomoy Bhattacharjee; Carmen J Gil; Samantha L Marshall; Juan M Urueña; Christopher S O'Bryan; Matt Carstens; Benjamin Keselowsky; Glyn D Palmer; Steve Ghivizzani; C Parker Gibbs; W Gregory Sawyer; Thomas E Angelini
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2016-06-20

4.  Gellan Fluid Gel as a Versatile Support Bath Material for Fluid Extrusion Bioprinting.

Authors:  Ashley M Compaan; Kaidong Song; Yong Huang
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 9.229

5.  Soft Somatosensitive Actuators via Embedded 3D Printing.

Authors:  Ryan L Truby; Michael Wehner; Abigail K Grosskopf; Daniel M Vogt; Sebastien G M Uzel; Robert J Wood; Jennifer A Lewis
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 30.849

6.  3D-Printed Ultra-Robust Surface-Doped Porous Silicone Sensors for Wearable Biomonitoring.

Authors:  Elham Davoodi; Hossein Montazerian; Reihaneh Haghniaz; Armin Rashidi; Samad Ahadian; Amir Sheikhi; Jun Chen; Ali Khademhosseini; Abbas S Milani; Mina Hoorfar; Ehsan Toyserkani
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 15.881

7.  3D-Printed Synthetic Vocal Fold Models.

Authors:  Ryan G T Romero; Mark B Colton; Scott L Thomson
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Effect of layer thickness and printing orientation on mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy of 3D printed porous samples for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Arghavan Farzadi; Mehran Solati-Hashjin; Mitra Asadi-Eydivand; Noor Azuan Abu Osman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Expert-guided optimization for 3D printing of soft and liquid materials.

Authors:  Sara Abdollahi; Alexander Davis; John H Miller; Adam W Feinberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Recent advances on the development of phantoms using 3D printing for imaging with CT, MRI, PET, SPECT, and ultrasound.

Authors:  Valeria Filippou; Charalampos Tsoumpas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  2 in total

1.  Embedded 3D printing of multi-layer, self-oscillating vocal fold models.

Authors:  Taylor E Greenwood; Scott L Thomson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Fabrication of 3D GelMA Scaffolds Using Agarose Microgel Embedded Printing.

Authors:  Bo Yang; Tianqi Liu; Ge Gao; Xianglin Zhang; Bin Wu
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.891

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.