Literature DB >> 29594164

Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery: Robotic Surgery versus Laparoscopic Procedures for Esophageal Malignancy.

Matthias Biebl1, Andreas Andreou1, Sascha Chopra1, Christian Denecke1, Johann Pratschke1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The evolution of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) also extends to the field of esophageal surgery and has brought forth the development of several approaches of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Hybrid and total minimally invasive operative techniques have proven beneficial compared to open surgery and are currently evaluated against robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE). We aim to review the current literature regarding the position of MIE versus RAMIE.
METHODS: A systematic review of the relevant literature on minimally invasive esophageal surgery for cancer is presented. A PubMed search was carried out for the period of 1992-2018 with the following search terms: 'esophageal cancer', 'minimally invasive surgery', 'resection', 'transhiatal', 'transthoracic', 'MIE', 'hybrid', 'robotic resection', 'RAMIE', 'RATE'.
RESULTS: Hybrid and total minimally invasive operative techniques have proven beneficial, especially with regard to pulmonary complications, compared to open surgery. Oncologic outcomes appear equivalent between open and minimally invasive techniques. Currently, the position of RAMIE is being evaluated against other minimally invasive techniques.
CONCLUSION: All minimally invasive techniques confer the expected reduction in perioperative morbidity compared to open surgery. However, MIS is still evolving with regard to specific technical challenges, especially anastomotic techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal cancer; Hybrid resection; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; RAMIE; Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy

Year:  2018        PMID: 29594164      PMCID: PMC5869581          DOI: 10.1159/000487011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Visc Med        ISSN: 2297-4725


  58 in total

1.  Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients.

Authors:  Torben Glatz; Goran Marjanovic; Birte Kulemann; Olivia Sick; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; Jens Hoeppner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.

Authors:  Benny Weksler; Jennifer L Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroya Takeuchi; Hiroaki Miyata; Soji Ozawa; Harushi Udagawa; Harushi Osugi; Hisahiro Matsubara; Hiroyuki Konno; Yasuyuki Seto; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer?

Authors:  Jingpei Li; Yaxing Shen; Lijie Tan; Mingxiang Feng; Hao Wang; Yong Xi; Qun Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Fully robotic da Vinci Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in four-arm technique-problems and solutions.

Authors:  J-H Egberts; H Stein; H Aselmann; A Hendricks; T Becker
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.429

7.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Could hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy improve the treatment results of esophageal cancer?

Authors:  M Bjelovic; T Babic; B Spica; D Gunjic; M Veselinovic; G Trajkovic
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 9.  Reporting of short-term clinical outcomes after esophagectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Natalie S Blencowe; Sean Strong; Angus G K McNair; Sara T Brookes; Tom Crosby; S Michael Griffin; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Oncologic Long-Term Results of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Thoraco-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy with Two-Field Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  P C van der Sluis; J P Ruurda; R J J Verhage; S van der Horst; L Haverkamp; P D Siersema; I H M Borel Rinkes; F J W Ten Kate; R van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Robotics and augmented reality : Current state of development and future perspectives].

Authors:  H Feußner; D Ostler; D Wilhelm
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Transhiatal robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: unclear benefits compared to traditional transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  Toby P Keeney-Bonthrone; Kenneth L Abbott; Caleb Haley; Monita Karmakar; Armani M Hawes; Andrew C Chang; Jules Lin; William R Lynch; Philip W Carrott; Kiran H Lagisetty; Mark B Orringer; Rishindra M Reddy
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-09-28

3.  Oncologic Resection in Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Transhiatal Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Kimberly Washington; Jeffrey R Watkins; John Jay; D Rohan Jeyarajah
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Multicenter Experience in Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy - a Comparison of Hybrid and Totally Robot-Assisted Techniques.

Authors:  Peter P Grimminger; Julia I Staubitz; Daniel Perez; Tarik Ghadban; Matthias Reeh; Pasquale Scognamiglio; Jakob R Izbicki; Matthias Biebl; Hans Fuchs; Christiane J Bruns; Hauke Lang; Thomas Becker; Jan-Hendrik Egberts
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Mederos; Michael J de Virgilio; Rivfka Shenoy; Linda Ye; Paul A Toste; Selene S Mak; Marika S Booth; Meron M Begashaw; Mark Wilson; William Gunnar; Paul G Shekelle; Melinda Maggard-Gibbons; Mark D Girgis
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.