Literature DB >> 29589178

Anterior robotic approach in en-bloc sacrectomy: a preliminary experience.

Giacomo Corrado1, Carmine Zoccali2, Nicola Salducca2, Andrea Oddi3, Enrico Vizza4, Roberto Biagini2.   

Abstract

En-bloc sacrectomy is a highly demanding surgical procedure necessary to obtain wide margin in sacral tumor. The double approach, anterior and posterior approach, is usually preferred for tumors extending proximally to S3 level where iliac internal vessels are at a higher risk for damage during posterior surgery. It can be justified also in selected cases to decrease the risk of posterior approach as in local recurrence or in patients who already underwent laparotomy. Our intent was to apply robotic-assisted techniques for performing anterior preparatory approach for sacrectomy surgery. Between December 2010 and December 2014, three cases of sacrectomies were performed in a previous robotic-assisted preparatory approach to separate the rectum from the tumor. Dissections were successfully performed in all cases close to the pelvic floor. The surgeon was able to position a Gore-Tex spacer between the anterior tumor surface and the rectum in all cases. The anterior dissections were performed with a perfect control of bleeding. No complications related to the anterior approach were reported. Robot-assisted surgery can be considered a valid and minimally invasive technique which allows a safe anterior dissection of the pelvic structures dividing tumors from surrounding tissues. It allows to place a spacer to protect organs during posterior sacral resection performed on the same day or at a later time. Further experiences are advocated to evaluate its efficiency in sacral tumors of greater size.

Entities:  

Keywords:  En-bloc sacrectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Robot-assisted surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29589178     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0807-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  14 in total

Review 1.  Surgical techniques for total sacrectomy and spinopelvic reconstruction.

Authors:  Ho-Yeol Zhang; Issada Thongtrangan; Raju S V Balabhadra; Judith A Murovic; Daniel H Kim
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 2.  Robotic surgery in gynecologic cancer.

Authors:  Ga Won Yim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Thomas E Ahlering; Anthony Costello; James A Eastham; Markus Graefen; Giorgio Guazzoni; Mani Menon; Alexandre Mottrie; Vipul R Patel; Henk Van der Poel; Raymond C Rosen; Ashutosh K Tewari; Timothy G Wilson; Filiberto Zattoni; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Intermediate grade vertebral osteosarcoma in a patient affected by a sacral chondrosarcoma and hereditary multiple exostosis.

Authors:  C Zoccali; V Ferrraresi; B Rossi; R Covello; N Salducca
Journal:  Minerva Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.806

5.  The surgical neurovascular anatomy relating to partial and complete sacral and sacroiliac resections: a cadaveric, anatomic study.

Authors:  Carmine Zoccali; Jesse Skoch; Apar Patel; Christina M Walter; Philip Maykowski; Ali A Baaj
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection--case report.

Authors:  B M Sert; V M Abeler
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 0.196

7.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: Analysis of surgical performance.

Authors:  Robert W Holloway; Sarfraz Ahmad; Sara A DeNardis; Lorna B Peterson; Nazia Sultana; Glenn E Bigsby; Dirk P Pikaart; Neil J Finkler
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Leigh G Seamon; Jeffrey M Fowler; Debra L Richardson; Matthew J Carlson; Sue Valmadre; Gary S Phillips; David E Cohn
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.

Authors:  E Vizza; G Corrado; E Mancini; P Vici; D Sergi; E Baiocco; L Patrizi; M Saltari; G Pomati; G Cutillo
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 4.424

10.  Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2.

Authors:  Joan L Walker; Marion R Piedmonte; Nick M Spirtos; Scott M Eisenkop; John B Schlaerth; Robert S Mannel; Gregory Spiegel; Richard Barakat; Michael L Pearl; Sudarshan K Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.