Literature DB >> 25682274

The surgical neurovascular anatomy relating to partial and complete sacral and sacroiliac resections: a cadaveric, anatomic study.

Carmine Zoccali1, Jesse Skoch, Apar Patel, Christina M Walter, Philip Maykowski, Ali A Baaj.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pelvic and sacral surgeries are considered technically difficult due to the complex multidimensional anatomy and the presence of significant neurovascular structures. Knowledge of the key neurovascular anatomy is essential for safe and effective execution of partial and complete sacral resections. The goal of this anatomic, cadaveric study is to describe the pertinent neurovascular anatomy during these procedures.
METHODS: Three embalmed human cadaveric specimens were used. Sacrectomies and sacroiliac joint resections were simulated and the structures at risk were identified. Both anterior and posterior approaches were evaluated.
RESULTS: During sacroiliac joint resection, L5 nerve roots are at high risk for iatrogenic injury; the vasculatures at greatest risk are the common iliac vessels and internal iliac vessels with L5-S1 and S1-S2 high sacrectomies. Minor bleeding risk is associated with S2-S3 osteotomy because of the potential to damage superior gluteal vessels. S3-S4 osteotomy presents a low risk of bleeding. Adjacent nerve roots proximal to the resection level are at high risk during higher sacrectomies.
CONCLUSIONS: Several sacrectomy techniques are available and selection often depends on the specific case and surgeon preference; nevertheless, anatomic knowledge is extremely important. Considering the highly variable anatomic relations of the vascular bundles, a preoperative evaluation with CT or MRI with vascular reconstruction may be helpful to decrease bleeding risk by preemptively binding the internal iliac vessels in cases where higher tumors are present. To decrease the risk of damaging nerve roots, it is recommended to perform the resection as close to the involved foramina as possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25682274     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3815-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  14 in total

Review 1.  Surgical techniques for total sacrectomy and spinopelvic reconstruction.

Authors:  Ho-Yeol Zhang; Issada Thongtrangan; Raju S V Balabhadra; Judith A Murovic; Daniel H Kim
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 2.  Total sacrectomy and Galveston L-rod reconstruction for malignant neoplasms. Technical note.

Authors:  Z L Gokaslan; M M Romsdahl; S S Kroll; G L Walsh; T A Gillis; D M Wildrick; M E Leavens
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Variability of the origin of the uterine artery: laparoscopic surgical observation.

Authors:  Zdenek Holub; Jan Lukac; Lev Kliment; Stepan Urbanek
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.730

4.  En bloc resection of primary sacral tumors: classification of surgical approaches and outcome.

Authors:  Daryl R Fourney; Laurence D Rhines; Stephen J Hentschel; John M Skibber; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Kristin L Weber; Dima Suki; Gary L Gallia; Ira Garonzik; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-08

5.  A new technique to perform pelvic osteotomy using Gigli saw.

Authors:  C Zoccali; G Zoccali; G Bakaloudis; N Salducca; R Biagini
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Variability of the retropubic space anatomy in female cadavers.

Authors:  Sujatha D Pathi; Mario E Castellanos; Marlene M Corton
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Obturator artery revisited.

Authors:  José R Sañudo; Rosa Mirapeix; Marc Rodriguez-Niedenführ; Eva Maranillo; Ian G Parkin; Teresa Vázquez
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Magnetic resonance anatomic study of iliocava junction and left iliac vein positions related to L5-S1 disc.

Authors:  J Capellades; F Pellisé; A Rovira; E Grivé; S Pedraza; C Villanueva
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Morphometry of the internal iliac artery in different ethnic groups.

Authors:  C Fătu; M Puişoru; I C Fătu
Journal:  Ann Anat       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Prognostic factors and outcome of pelvic, sacral, and spinal chondrosarcomas: a center-based study of 69 cases.

Authors:  P Bergh; B Gunterberg; J M Meis-Kindblom; L G Kindblom
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Residual neurological function after sacral root resection during en-bloc sacrectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carmine Zoccali; Jesse Skoch; Apar S Patel; Christina M Walter; Philip Maykowski; Ali A Baaj
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Nerve preservation during partial sacrectomy by two-stage anterior and posterior approach: illustrative case.

Authors:  Parménides Guadarrama-Ortíz; Ingrid Montes de Oca-Vargas; José Alberto Choreño-Parra; André Garibay-Gracián; Deyanira Capi-Casillas; Alondra Román-Villagomez; Citlaltepetl Salinas-Lara; Ulises Palacios-Zúñiga; Ángel Daniel Prieto-Rivera
Journal:  J Neurosurg Case Lessons       Date:  2021-09-20

Review 3.  Additive manufacturing technique-designed metallic porous implants for clinical application in orthopedics.

Authors:  Chaohua Gao; Chenyu Wang; Hui Jin; Zhonghan Wang; Zuhao Li; Chenyu Shi; Yi Leng; Fan Yang; He Liu; Jincheng Wang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 4.036

4.  Anterior robotic approach in en-bloc sacrectomy: a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Giacomo Corrado; Carmine Zoccali; Nicola Salducca; Andrea Oddi; Enrico Vizza; Roberto Biagini
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-03-27

5.  Identifying the superior and inferior gluteal arteries during a sacrectomy via a posterior approach.

Authors:  David Christopher Kieser; Pierre Coudert; Derek Thomas Cawley; Elodie Gaignard; Takashi Fujishiro; Kaissar Farah; Louis Boissiere; Ibrahim Obeid; Vincent Pointillart; Jean-Marc Vital; Olivier Gille
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

6.  Sacral Reconstruction with a 3D-Printed Implant after Hemisacrectomy in a Patient with Sacral Osteosarcoma: 1-Year Follow-Up Result.

Authors:  Doyoung Kim; Jun Young Lim; Kyu Won Shim; Jung Woo Han; Seong Yi; Do Heum Yoon; Keung Nyun Kim; Yoon Ha; Gyu Yeul Ji; Dong Ah Shin
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  Sacral Osteoneogenesis after Complete Sacrectomy in a Patient with Ewing Sarcoma.

Authors:  T Hockertz; W Eberl; M Velickovic
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2017-12-17

Review 8.  Demystifying MR Neurography of the Lumbosacral Plexus: From Protocols to Pathologies.

Authors:  Francisco J Muniz Neto; Eduardo N Kihara Filho; Frederico C Miranda; Laercio A Rosemberg; Durval C B Santos; Atul K Taneja
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Partial sacrectomy with patient-specific osteotomy guides.

Authors:  Mazda Farshad; Farah Selman; Marco D Burkhard; Daniel Müller; José Miguel Spirig
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2021-10-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.