Literature DB >> 19765807

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: Analysis of surgical performance.

Robert W Holloway1, Sarfraz Ahmad, Sara A DeNardis, Lorna B Peterson, Nazia Sultana, Glenn E Bigsby, Dirk P Pikaart, Neil J Finkler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To provide an objective analysis of surgical performance of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH) with lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer during the learning phase of the procedure and to assess opportunities for improvement.
METHODS: From July 2006 to March 2008, 100 patients with endometrial cancer underwent RALH with lymphadenectomy using the da Vinci Robotic Surgical System. Data were analyzed for operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), intra-operative complications, surgical-pathologic factors, and post-operative complications using an intent-to-treat analysis. A comparison of the data on a quartile (Q) basis was performed for the 100 RALH cases and separately for the 65 cases that had a complete pelvic-and-aortic lymphadenectomy (PAL).
RESULTS: Age and body mass index (BMI) did not change significantly during the study. More grade 3 tumors were treated in the last 50 cases (22% vs. 10%, p<0.05). Stage III tumors were identified in 18.7% cases in Q2-4 and none in Q1 (p<0.05). The number of patients undergoing complete PAL and the number of aortic lymph nodes (LN) removed per case increased each quarter. There were 4 (4%) conversions to laparotomy. Delayed vaginal cuff healing decreased from 16% in Q1 to 0% in Q3-4. No case required blood transfusion. Comparing first 10 cases to the last 10 cases, the total LN counts increased from 15 to 21 nodes, the aortic LN counts increased from 4.7 to 8.0, and the OT decreased from 203 to 160 min. Intra-surgeon analysis revealed an improvement in the total LN yields from first 50 to second 50 cases for each surgeon.
CONCLUSIONS: Operative times decreased and aortic dissections improved with increasing LN counts during the first 100 cases of RALH. Furthermore, patient safety and improvement in surgical performance was demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19765807     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  17 in total

1.  Robotically assisted laparoscopy for paraaortic lymphadenectomy: technical description and results of an initial experience.

Authors:  Eric Lambaudie; Fabrice Narducci; Eric Leblanc; Marie Bannier; Camille Jauffret; Francesco Cannone; Gilles Houvenaeghel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy and staging for the treatment of endometrial cancer: a comparison with conventional laparoscopy and abdominal approaches.

Authors:  Ricardo Estape; Nicholas Lambrou; Eric Estape; Oscar Vega; Trisha Ojea
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-06-25

Review 3.  WITHDRAWN: Robotic assisted surgery for gynaecological cancer.

Authors:  Gang Shi; DongHao Lu; Zhihong Liu; Dan Liu; Xiaoyan Zhou
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-12-11

4.  The technique of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynaecology, its introduction into the clinical routine of a gynaecological department and the analysis of the perioperative courses - a German experience.

Authors:  A Kubilay Ertan; Michael Ulbricht; Kirsten Huebner; Alexander Di Liberto
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2011-06-01

5.  Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center.

Authors:  Joel Cardenas-Goicoechea; Sarah Adams; Suneel B Bhat; Thomas C Randall
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; William M Burke; Elizabeth T Wilde; Sharyn N Lewin; Abigail S Charles; Jin Hee Kim; Noah Goldman; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology.

Authors:  Theresa A Lawrie; Hongqian Liu; DongHao Lu; Therese Dowswell; Huan Song; Lei Wang; Gang Shi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-15

8.  Prospective randomized study comparing robotic-assisted hysterectomy and regional lymphadenectomy with traditional laparotomy for staging of endometrial carcinoma -initial Indian experience.

Authors:  S P Somashekhar; Rajshekhar C Jaka; Shabber S Zaveri
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-06-21

9.  Anterior robotic approach in en-bloc sacrectomy: a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Giacomo Corrado; Carmine Zoccali; Nicola Salducca; Andrea Oddi; Enrico Vizza; Roberto Biagini
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-03-27

10.  The impact of robotic surgery on gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Alpa M Nick; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.