BACKGROUND: Although IPMN are thought to represent a whole-gland disease, segmental resection remains the most frequently performed treatment. We sought to determine the rates, patterns, and predictors of IPMN progression in the pancreatic remnant following segmental resection of noninvasive or microinvasive IPMN. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was queried to identify all patients who underwent resection of noninvasive or microinvasive IPMN (≤ 10 mm of invasive component) between 1989 and 2015. Progression (recurrence) was defined as either the development of cancer, a new IPMN cystic lesion > 1 cm or ≥ 50% increase in the diameter of residual IPMN lesions in the remnant. Univariate and multivariate cox regression models were created to determine predictors of progression. RESULTS: A total of 319 patients underwent resection for noninvasive and microinvasive IPMN. The median age was 68, 53% had branch-duct (BD) IPMN, and 6% had microinvasive disease. After a median follow-up of 42 months, 71 patients (22%) experienced IPMN progression. Within this group of 71 patients, 11 (16% of recurrence) developed invasive cancer in the pancreatic remnant after a median of 28 months. Twelve patients (17%) experienced progression > 5 years following initial resection. On multivariate analysis, a distal location of the initial lesion was associated with an increased risk of progression (multivariate hazards ratio = 2.43, confidence interval 1.47-4.0, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 22% of patients had disease progression following resection of noninvasive or microinvasive IPMN; 16% of these progressions represented invasive disease. These patients represent a high-risk group and should undergo long-term radiographic surveillance.
BACKGROUND: Although IPMN are thought to represent a whole-gland disease, segmental resection remains the most frequently performed treatment. We sought to determine the rates, patterns, and predictors of IPMN progression in the pancreatic remnant following segmental resection of noninvasive or microinvasive IPMN. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was queried to identify all patients who underwent resection of noninvasive or microinvasive IPMN (≤ 10 mm of invasive component) between 1989 and 2015. Progression (recurrence) was defined as either the development of cancer, a new IPMN cystic lesion > 1 cm or ≥ 50% increase in the diameter of residual IPMN lesions in the remnant. Univariate and multivariate cox regression models were created to determine predictors of progression. RESULTS: A total of 319 patients underwent resection for noninvasive and microinvasive IPMN. The median age was 68, 53% had branch-duct (BD) IPMN, and 6% had microinvasive disease. After a median follow-up of 42 months, 71 patients (22%) experienced IPMN progression. Within this group of 71 patients, 11 (16% of recurrence) developed invasive cancer in the pancreatic remnant after a median of 28 months. Twelve patients (17%) experienced progression > 5 years following initial resection. On multivariate analysis, a distal location of the initial lesion was associated with an increased risk of progression (multivariate hazards ratio = 2.43, confidence interval 1.47-4.0, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 22% of patients had disease progression following resection of noninvasive or microinvasive IPMN; 16% of these progressions represented invasive disease. These patients represent a high-risk group and should undergo long-term radiographic surveillance.
Authors: Olca Basturk; Seung-Mo Hong; Laura D Wood; N Volkan Adsay; Jorge Albores-Saavedra; Andrew V Biankin; Lodewijk A A Brosens; Noriyoshi Fukushima; Michael Goggins; Ralph H Hruban; Yo Kato; David S Klimstra; Günter Klöppel; Alyssa Krasinskas; Daniel S Longnecker; Hanno Matthaei; G Johan A Offerhaus; Michio Shimizu; Kyoichi Takaori; Benoit Terris; Shinichi Yachida; Irene Esposito; Toru Furukawa Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Volkan Adsay; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Toru Furukawa; Olca Basturk; Giuseppe Zamboni; Giovanni Marchegiani; Claudio Bassi; Roberto Salvia; Giuseppe Malleo; Salvatore Paiella; Christopher L Wolfgang; Hanno Matthaei; G Johan Offerhaus; Mustapha Adham; Marco J Bruno; Michelle D Reid; Alyssa Krasinskas; Günter Klöppel; Nobuyuki Ohike; Takuma Tajiri; Kee-Taek Jang; Juan Carlos Roa; Peter Allen; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo; Jin-Young Jang; David S Klimstra; Ralph H Hruban Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Giovanni Marchegiani; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Cristina R Ferrone; Vicente Morales-Oyarvide; Andrew L Warshaw; Keith D Lillemoe; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Megan Winner; Irene Epelboym; Helen Remotti; James L Lee; Beth A Schrope; John A Chabot; John D Allendorf Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: J Lafemina; N Katabi; D Klimstra; C Correa-Gallego; S Gaujoux; T P Kingham; R P Dematteo; Y Fong; M I D'Angelica; W R Jarnagin; R K Do; M F Brennan; Peter J Allen Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-10-31 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Chandrajit P Raut; Karen R Cleary; Gregg A Staerkel; James L Abbruzzese; Robert A Wolff; Jeffrey H Lee; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Jeffrey E Lee; Peter W T Pisters; Douglas B Evans Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2006-03-07 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Michael J Pflüger; James F Griffin; Wenzel M Hackeng; Satomi Kawamoto; Jun Yu; Peter Chianchiano; Eunice Shin; Gemma Lionheart; Hua-Ling Tsai; Hao Wang; Neda Rezaee; Richard A Burkhart; John L Cameron; Elizabeth D Thompson; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jin He; Lodewijk A A Brosens; Laura D Wood Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Naziheh Assarzadegan; Elizabeth Thompson; Kevan Salimian; Matthias M Gaida; Lodewijk A A Brosens; Laura Wood; Syed Z Ali; Ralph H Hruban Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 2.895