Literature DB >> 33214420

The Impact of Clinical and Pathological Features on Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Recurrence After Surgical Resection: Long-Term Follow-Up Analysis.

Michael J Pflüger1,2, James F Griffin1,3, Wenzel M Hackeng4, Satomi Kawamoto5, Jun Yu3, Peter Chianchiano1, Eunice Shin1, Gemma Lionheart1, Hua-Ling Tsai6, Hao Wang6, Neda Rezaee3, Richard A Burkhart3, John L Cameron3, Elizabeth D Thompson1, Christopher L Wolfgang3, Jin He3, Lodewijk A A Brosens1,4, Laura D Wood1,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify risk factors for recurrence after pancreatic resection for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Long-term follow-up data on recurrence after surgical resection for IPMN are currently lacking. Previous studies have presented mixed results on the role of margin status in risk of recurrence after surgical resection.
METHODS: A total of 126 patients that underwent resection for noninvasive IPMN were followed for a median of 9.5 years. Dedicated pathological and radiological reviews were performed to correlate clinical and pathological features (including detailed pathological features of the parenchymal margin) with recurrence after surgical resection. In addition, in a subset of 32 patients with positive margins, we determined the relationship between the margin and original IPMN using driver gene mutations identified by next-generation sequencing.
RESULTS: Family history of pancreatic cancer and high-grade IPMN was identified as risk factors for recurrence in both uni- and multivariate analysis (adjusted hazard ratio 3.05 and 1.88, respectively). Although positive margin was not significantly associated with recurrence in our cohort, the size and grade of the dysplastic focus at the margin were significantly correlated with recurrence in margin-positive patients. Genetic analyses showed that the neoplastic epithelium at the margin was independent from the original IPMN in at least 9 of 32 cases (28%). The majority of recurrences (74%) occurred after 3 years, and a significant minority (32%) occurred after 5 years.
CONCLUSION: Sustained postoperative surveillance for all patients is indicated, particularly those with risk factors such has family history and high-grade dysplasia.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33214420      PMCID: PMC9516436          DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   13.787


  37 in total

1.  A Revised Classification System and Recommendations From the Baltimore Consensus Meeting for Neoplastic Precursor Lesions in the Pancreas.

Authors:  Olca Basturk; Seung-Mo Hong; Laura D Wood; N Volkan Adsay; Jorge Albores-Saavedra; Andrew V Biankin; Lodewijk A A Brosens; Noriyoshi Fukushima; Michael Goggins; Ralph H Hruban; Yo Kato; David S Klimstra; Günter Klöppel; Alyssa Krasinskas; Daniel S Longnecker; Hanno Matthaei; G Johan A Offerhaus; Michio Shimizu; Kyoichi Takaori; Benoit Terris; Shinichi Yachida; Irene Esposito; Toru Furukawa
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 2.  Revisions of international consensus Fukuoka guidelines for the management of IPMN of the pancreas.

Authors:  Masao Tanaka; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo; Terumi Kamisawa; Jin Young Jang; Philippe Levy; Takao Ohtsuka; Roberto Salvia; Yasuhiro Shimizu; Minoru Tada; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.996

3.  Recurrence patterns after surgical resection of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas; a multicenter, retrospective study of 1074 IPMN patients by the Japan Pancreas Society.

Authors:  Seiko Hirono; Yasuhiro Shimizu; Takao Ohtsuka; Toshifumi Kin; Kazuo Hara; Atsushi Kanno; Shinsuke Koshita; Keiji Hanada; Masayuki Kitano; Hiroyuki Inoue; Takao Itoi; Toshiharu Ueki; Toshio Shimokawa; Susumu Hijioka; Akio Yanagisawa; Masafumi Nakamura; Kazuichi Okazaki; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) with high-grade dysplasia is a risk factor for the subsequent development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Neda Rezaee; Carlotta Barbon; Ahmed Zaki; Jin He; Bulent Salman; Ralph H Hruban; John L Cameron; Joseph M Herman; Nita Ahuja; Anne Marie Lennon; Matthew J Weiss; Laura D Wood; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 5.  Radiological Workup of Cystic Neoplasms of the Pancreas.

Authors:  Thomas L Bollen; Frank J Wessels
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-06-15

6.  Is it necessary to follow patients after resection of a benign pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm?

Authors:  Jin He; John L Cameron; Nita Ahuja; Martin A Makary; Kenzo Hirose; Michael A Choti; Richard D Schulick; Ralph H Hruban; Timothy M Pawlik; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Progression Patterns in the Remnant Pancreas after Resection of Non-Invasive or Micro-Invasive Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms (IPMN).

Authors:  Mohammad Al Efishat; Marc A Attiyeh; Anne A Eaton; Mithat Gönen; Olca Basturk; David Klimstra; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; T Peter Kingham; Vinod Balachandran; William R Jarnagin; Peter J Allen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  IPMN involving the main pancreatic duct: biology, epidemiology, and long-term outcomes following resection.

Authors:  Giovanni Marchegiani; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Klaus Sahora; Vicente Morales-Oyarvide; Sarah Thayer; Cristina Ferrone; Andrew L Warshaw; Keith D Lillemoe; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Long-term prospective cohort study of patients undergoing pancreatectomy for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: implications for postoperative surveillance.

Authors:  Mee Joo Kang; Jin-Young Jang; Kyoung Bun Lee; Ye Rim Chang; Wooil Kwon; Sun-Whe Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Authors:  Yoo Min Kim; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-01-04

2.  Reappraise role of No. 10 lymphadenectomy for proximal gastric cancer in the era of minimal invasive surgery during total gastrectomy: a pooled analysis of 4 prospective trial.

Authors:  Qing Zhong; Qi-Yue Chen; Yan-Chang Xu; Gang Zhao; Li-Sheng Cai; Guo-Xin Li; Ze-Kuan Xu; Su Yan; Zu-Guang Wu; Fang-Qin Xue; Yi-Hong Sun; Dong-Po Xu; Wen-Bin Zhang; Jin Wan; Pei-Wu Yu; Jian-Kun Hu; Xiang-Qian Su; Jia-Fu Ji; Zi-Yu Li; Jun You; Yong Li; Lin Fan; Chao-Hui Zheng; Jian-Wei Xie; Ping Li; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 3.  Early detection of pancreatic cancer using DNA-based molecular approaches.

Authors:  Aatur D Singhi; Laura D Wood
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 4.  Pathology of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

Authors:  Naziheh Assarzadegan; Elizabeth Thompson; Kevan Salimian; Matthias M Gaida; Lodewijk A A Brosens; Laura Wood; Syed Z Ali; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Textbook outcome and survival of robotic versus laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matched cohort study.

Authors:  Chul Kyu Roh; Soomin Lee; Sang-Yong Son; Hoon Hur; Sang-Uk Han
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.