Literature DB >> 18635231

Clinical correlates of renal angiomyolipoma subtypes in 209 patients: classic, fat poor, tuberous sclerosis associated and epithelioid.

Brian R Lane1, Hakan Aydin, Teresa L Danforth, Ming Zhou, Erick M Remer, Andrew C Novick, Steven C Campbell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Angiomyolipomas classically present radiographically as fat containing lesions but some fail to demonstrate fat content. Histologically confirmed angiomyolipomas uniformly follow a benign course but rare epithelioid variants of angiomyolipoma can recur and metastasize. We investigated the clinical, radiographic and histological characteristics of each angiomyolipoma subtype.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pertinent data were recorded for 209 patients surgically treated for angiomyolipoma in 219 kidneys from 1981 to 2007. Classic and fat poor angiomyolipomas were classified radiographically based on the presence or absence of fat and classified histologically based on the presence of triphasic, monophasic or epithelioid histology.
RESULTS: Median radiographic size was 3.2, 4.9 and 10 cm in patients with a single angiomyolipoma (59% of patients), multiple angiomyolipomas and tuberous sclerosis (probable or definite), respectively. In these 3 groups 65%, 47% and 33% of lesions were not suspected radiographically (fat poor angiomyolipoma). Fat poor angiomyolipomas were more commonly single, smaller and in older patients. Triphasic histology was evident in 76% of angiomyolipomas with 16% demonstrating a predominance of 1 component and 8% containing epithelioid features. Despite potentially aggressive findings in 18% (eg presence within the perinephric fat, lymph node involvement) no angiomyolipoma recurred during a mean followup of 3.4 years (range 0 to 24). A total of 28 (13%) patients with angiomyolipoma had concomitant renal cell carcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: A surprisingly high number of resected angiomyolipomas was not suspected radiographically indicating the importance of precise radiographic characterization to minimize nephrectomy for fat poor angiomyolipoma, which should remain a research priority. In this sizeable single institution series no triphasic, monophasic or epithelioid angiomyolipoma recurred despite potentially aggressive findings in a substantial proportion of cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18635231     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  55 in total

Review 1.  Renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat: Can we make the diagnosis using CT and MRI?

Authors:  Robert S Lim; Trevor A Flood; Matthew D F McInnes; Luke T Lavallee; Nicola Schieda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Diagnostic approach to eosinophilic renal neoplasms.

Authors:  Oleksandr N Kryvenko; Merce Jorda; Pedram Argani; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  Frequency of undiagnosed cystic lung disease in patients with sporadic renal angiomyolipomas.

Authors:  Jay H Ryu; Thomas E Hartman; Vicente E Torres; Paul A Decker
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  A case of pararenal angiomyolipoma arising from an existing exophytic angiomyolipoma.

Authors:  Michael Lipsky; Ingride Richardson; Bassir Tareen
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Discordance about the use of the term minimal fat angiomyolipoma.

Authors:  Teresa Pusiol; Irene Piscioli; Alice Morini; Ivan Pedrosa; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Solid renal masses: what the numbers tell us.

Authors:  Stella K Kang; William C Huang; Pari V Pandharipande; Hersh Chandarana
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Commentary.

Authors:  Leonardo Oliveira Reis; Emerson Luís Zani
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2012-05

8.  Clinical presentation, management, and outcome of patients with incidental renal angiomyolipoma in qatar.

Authors:  Hassan Al-Thani; Ayman El-Menyar; Maryam Al-Sulaiti; Jamela El-Mabrok; Khairi Hajaji; Hesham Elgohary; Ahmed Al-Malki; Abdelhakem Tabeb
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2014-11

Review 9.  Imaging of Solid Renal Masses.

Authors:  Fernando U Kay; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.241

10.  Trends of presentation and clinical outcome of treated renal angiomyolipoma.

Authors:  Kyo Chul Koo; Won Tae Kim; Won Sik Ham; Jin Sun Lee; Hee Jeong Ju; Young Deuk Choi
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.