Literature DB >> 2726410

Picture perception is array-specific: viewing angle versus apparent orientation.

T O Halloran.   

Abstract

The amount that a pictured lattice appears to be swung from its frame changes with subjects' viewpoint, in contrast with previous experiments using insufficient range of rotation. Also, this effect is shown to be independent of the physical slant of the picture surface, though not necessarily of border-shape information. Analysis of depicted headings which rotate with viewpoint, with respect to the picture plane, although the angle between these headings in virtual space hardly changes, relates these data to specific geometric properties of the perspective array as seen from the different viewpoints. Data show differential rotation of differently oriented features within a single depicted object, in a way that is dependent on task instructions. It is proposed that in picture perception, contradictory cues are resolved by combination.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2726410     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  9 in total

1.  Viewing direction and pictorial representation.

Authors:  H Wallach; V Slaughter
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-01

2.  Spatial layout, orientation relative to the observer, and perceived projection in pictures viewed at an angle.

Authors:  E B Goldstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The effect of perspective geometry on judged direction in spatial information instruments.

Authors:  M W McGreevy; S R Ellis
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  Distortions of perceived visual directions out of pictures.

Authors:  S R Ellis; S Smith; M W McGreevy
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-12

5.  Rotation of objects in pictures viewed at an angle: evidence for different properties of two types of pictorial space.

Authors:  E B Goldstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Affine distortions of pictorial space: some predictions for Goldstein (1987) that La Gournerie (1859) might have made.

Authors:  J E Cutting
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Geometry or not geometry? Perceived orientation and spatial layout in pictures viewed at an angle.

Authors:  E B Goldstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Picture perception: an analysis of visual compensation.

Authors:  R R Rosinski; T Mulholland; D Degelman; J Farber
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-12

9.  Rigidity in cinema seen from the front row, side aisle.

Authors:  J E Cutting
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.332

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Three-space inference from two-space stimulation.

Authors:  J B Deregowski; D M Parker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-04

2.  Compensation is unnecessary for the perception of faces in slanted pictures.

Authors:  T A Busey; N P Brady; J E Cutting
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-07

3.  The frame turns also: factors in differential rotation in pictures.

Authors:  T O Halloran
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.