| Literature DB >> 29581724 |
Ângela R L Nader1, Paulo Zielinsky1,2, Alexandre Antonio Naujorks1, Luiz Henrique S Nicoloso1, Antonio Luiz Piccoli Junior1, Natássia Miranda Sulis1, Luiza Ferreira van der Sand1, Victoria de Bittencourt Antunes1, Gabriela Dos Santos Marinho1, Fernanda Greinert Dos Santos1, Natan Pereira Gosmann3, Eduardo Becker Júnior1, Renato Frajndlich1, Tamara Beherens1, Marcelo Brandão da Silva1, Carolina Barbisan1, Stefano Busato1, Mauro Lopes1, Caroline Klein1.
Abstract
Background: Foramen ovale (FO) flow may be altered in IUGR. This study was designed to test this hypothesis.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29581724 PMCID: PMC5822859 DOI: 10.1155/2018/1496903
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Obstet Gynecol Int ISSN: 1687-9597
Figure 1Foramen ovale flow and pulsatility index assessment: echocardiography of fetus at 33 weeks with intrauterine growth restriction. The foramen ovale pulsatility index is 3.70.
Characteristics of the study groups. Maternal, fetal, and amniotic features are shown.
| Variable | Group I (IUGR) ( | Group II (AGA with MH) ( | Group III (AGA without MH) ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal age (years) | 24.46 ± 4.56 | 31.08 ± 4.64 | 22.23 ± 5.64 | <0.001† |
| Gestations | 2.20 ± 1.14 | 2.42 ± 1.08 | 1.92 ± 1.18 | 0.560 |
| Abortions | 0.27 ± 0.59 | 0.08 ± 0.28 | 0.15 ± 0.55 | 0.640 |
| Gestational age (weeks) | 31.21 ± 3.91 | 31.80 ± 4.31 | 30.01 ± 3.96 | 0.529 |
| Maternal weight gain (kg) | 7.36 ± 3.41 | 9.93 ± 8.55 | 7.41 ± 2.92 | 0.399 |
| Maternal body mass index | 27.67 ± 6.10 | 34.73 ± 5.57 | 27.00 ± 4.30 | 0.001∗ |
| Fetal weight (g) | 1221.9 ± 584.6 | 1768.8 ± 773.9 | 1600.1 ± 626.7 | <0.001∗ |
| AFIa < 8 cm | 5 (33.3%) | 2 (16.7%) | 1 (7.7%) | <0.001∗ |
IUGR: intrauterine growth restriction; AGA: adequate for gestational age; MH: maternal hypertension; kg: kilograms; g: grams; AFI: amniotic fluid index; aadjusted values for gestational age. †p < 0.05 between group II and groups I and III; ∗p < 0.05 between group I and groups II and III.
Doppler features of the study groups.
| Variable | Group I (IUGR) ( | Group II (AGA with MH) ( | Group III (AGA without MH) ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FO pulsatility index | 3.7 ± 0.99 | 2.84 ± 0.69 | 2.77 ± 0.44 | 0.004∗ |
| UtA resistance index | 0.59 ± 0.16 | 0.51 ± 0.12 | 0.49 ± 0.07 | 0.119 |
| UA resistance index | 0.72 ± 0.19 | 0.61 ± 0.07 | 0.63 ± 0.11 | 0.068 |
| MCA resistance index | 0.75 ± 0.09 | 0.76 ± 0.11 | 0.84 ± 0.09 | 0.039‡ |
IUGR: intrauterine growth restriction; AGA: adequate for gestational age; MH: maternal hypertension; FO: foramen ovale; UtA: uterine artery; UA: umbilical artery; MCA: median cerebral artery; ∗p < 0.05 between group I and groups II and III; ‡p < 0.05 between group III and groups I and II.
Figure 2Mean of foramen ovale pulsatility index and p value for ANOVA between study groups. IUGR = intrauterine growth restriction; AGA = adequate for gestational age; MH = maternal hypertension.
Figure 3Pearson correlation of the foramen ovale pulsatility index with resistance index of umbilical, median cerebral, and uterine arteries. MC = median cerebral.
Figure 4Bland–Altman plots showing intraobserver (a) and interobserver (b) variation in measurements of the foramen ovale pulsatility index. CI = confidence interval; SD = standard deviation.