Literature DB >> 29581609

<Editors' Choice> Surgical outcomes of decompressive laminoplasty with spinous process osteotomy to treat lumbar spinal stenosis.

Shunsuke Kanbara1, Testuya Urasaki2, Hiroyuki Tomita2, Kei Ando1, Kazuyoshi Kobayashi1, Kenyu Ito1, Mikito Tsushima1, Akiyuki Matsumoto1, Masayoshi Morozumi1, Satoshi Tanaka1, Kyotaro Ota1, Masaaki Machino1, Sadayuki Ito1, Yoshihiro Nishida1, Naoki Ishiguro1, Shiro Imagama1.   

Abstract

Decompressive laminoplasty with spinous process osteotomy (LSPO) was developed as a less invasive procedure for lumbar decompression by Weiner et al. There are few reports extensively highlighting the surgical outcomes of LSPO. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of LSPO for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). In total, 23 patients with LSS were studied. All patients were followed up for more than 2 years. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, the recovery rate (RR) of JOA scores, Visual analog scale (VAS) scores, responses to the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), sagittal alignment and segmental motion following LSPO were assessed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Postoperative paravertebral muscle atrophy and bone union rates between the spinous process and the residual laminae were assessed. Preoperative and 2-year postoperative JOA scores were 13.0 points and 24.7 points, respectively (p<0.001). With respect to JOABPEQ, significant improvements were observed in pain-related disorders (p<0.05), walking ability (p<0.01), social life function (p<0.05), and mental health (p<0.05) dimensions. There were no significant differences between preoperative and 2-year postoperative sagittal alignment and range of motion. The degree of the paravertebral muscle atrophy at 2 years postoperatively was 23.0 % at spread side and 9.6 % at nonspread side (p<0.01). The fusion rate of the spinous process with the arcus vertebrae was 87%. This result reveals that LSPO could acquire the reconstruction of posterior supporting structures. We demonstrated that LSPO could be a one of the surgical options for LSS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  a less invasive procedure; decompressive laminoplasty with spinous process osteotomy; lumbar spinal stenosis; surgical outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29581609      PMCID: PMC5857496          DOI: 10.18999/nagjms.80.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci        ISSN: 0027-7622            Impact factor:   1.131


  12 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal stability after graded facetectomies.

Authors:  K Abumi; M M Panjabi; K M Kramer; J Duranceau; T Oxland; J J Crisco
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques.

Authors:  Lacey Bresnahan; Alfred T Ogden; Raghu N Natarajan; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Radiographic evaluation of postoperative bone regrowth after microscopic bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Sho Dohzono; Akira Matsumura; Hidetomi Terai; Hiromitsu Toyoda; Akinobu Suzuki; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-03-22

4.  Relief of lumbar canal stenosis using multilevel subarticular fenestrations as an alternative to wide laminectomy: preliminary report.

Authors:  S Young; R Veerapen; S A O'Laoire
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy.

Authors:  K Hirabayashi; K Watanabe; K Wakano; N Suzuki; K Satomi; Y Ishii
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Microdecompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  B K Weiner; M Walker; R S Brower; J A McCulloch
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Surgical outcomes of modified lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kanbara; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Keigo Ito; Masaaki Machino; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-01-16

8.  Split-spinous process laminotomy and discectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Der-Yang Cho; Hung-Lin Lin; Wen-Yuan Lee; Han-Chung Lee
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-03

9.  Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome.

Authors:  T Sihvonen; A Herno; L Paljärvi; O Airaksinen; J Partanen; A Tapaninaho
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Spinous process osteotomies to facilitate lumbar decompressive surgery.

Authors:  B K Weiner; R D Fraser; M Peterson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Effect of lumbar laminectomy on spinal sagittal alignment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Juho Hatakka; Katri Pernaa; Juho Rantakokko; Inari Laaksonen; Mikhail Saltychev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Relationship between changes in physical function parameters and Roland-Morris disability questionnaire score after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  Hiroto Takenaka; Hideshi Sugiura; Mitsuhiro Kamiya; Kasuri Nishihama; Atsuki Ito; Junya Suzuki; Morio Kawamura; Shuntaro Hanamura
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 0.794

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.