Literature DB >> 9921593

Spinous process osteotomies to facilitate lumbar decompressive surgery.

B K Weiner1, R D Fraser, M Peterson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A technique for lumbar decompression using spinous process osteotomies is described, and the outcomes are studied prospectively.
OBJECTIVE: To describe a technique that affords a wide exposure for decompression while minimizing damage to surrounding tissues, and to analyze the outcomes formally using the technique. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Commonly used techniques of lumbar decompression, which include bilateral takedown of paraspinal musculature and aggressive bony resection, can result in significant iatrogenic sequelae, whereas minimally invasive techniques often provide inadequate visualization and/or decompression.
METHOD: Unilateral limited takedown of the multifidus is undertaken, followed by spinous process osteotomies at the involved levels. The spinous processes with the attached interspinous/supraspinous ligaments are then retracted. A complete "trumpeted" decompression is then undertaken. Fifty consecutive patients undergoing the procedure were analyzed prospectively and at follow-up by an independent observer using a validated functional outcome measure, a visual analog pain scale, and a patient satisfaction score.
RESULTS: Functional outcome scores improved on average by 47%, pain levels were reduced by 66%, and high satisfaction rates were reported by 83% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The technique affords excellent visualization and a wide area available for Kerrison use and angulation while minimizing destruction to tissues not directly involved in the pathologic process, including the paraspinal musculature as well as the interspinous/supraspinous ligament complex and facets. Additionally, it minimizes dead space and improves the cosmetic result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9921593     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199901010-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  24 in total

Review 1.  The conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly.

Authors:  Robert Gunzburg; Marek Szpalski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Anterior shear strength of the porcine lumbar spine after laminectomy and partial facetectomy.

Authors:  Guido B van Solinge; Albert J van der Veen; Jaap H van Dieën; Idsart Kingma; Barend J van Royen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Laminarthrectomy.

Authors:  Robert Gunzburg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Does pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar multifidus muscle predict clinical outcomes following lumbar spinal decompression for symptomatic spinal stenosis?

Authors:  Mario G T Zotti; F Vilas Boas; T Clifton; M Piche; W W Yoon; B J C Freeman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Laminarthrectomy as a surgical approach for decompressing the spinal canal: assessment of preoperative versus postoperative dural sac cross-sectional areal (DSCSA).

Authors:  Erland Hermansen; Gunnar Moen; Johan Barstad; Rune Birketvedt; Kari Indrekvam
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Comparative study of two spinous process (SP) osteotomy techniques for posterior decompression surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis: SP base versus splitting osteotomy.

Authors:  Gun Woo Lee; Myun-Whan Ahn
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Less invasive and less technically demanding decompressive procedure for lumbar spinal stenosis--appropriate for general orthopaedic surgeons?

Authors:  Masashi Takaso; Toshiyuki Nakazawa; Takayuki Imura; Takamitsu Okada; Kensuke Fukushima; Masaki Ueno; Wataru Saito; Ryousuke Shintani; Hiroyuki Sakagami; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masashi Yamazaki; Seiji Ohtori; Toshiaki Kotani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Spinous Process splitting Laminectomy: Clinical outcome and Radiological analysis of extent of decompression.

Authors:  Seungcheol Lee; Umesh Srikantha
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-06-01

9.  Finite element analysis for comparison of spinous process osteotomies technique with conventional laminectomy as lumbar decompression procedure.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Heoung-Jae Chun; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Hwan-Mo Lee; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; Jin-S Yeom
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  A predictive model for outcome after conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  K F Spratt; T S Keller; M Szpalski; K Vandeputte; R Gunzburg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.