Andrew Smith1, Reuben Addison2, Peter Rogers3, Jordan Stone-McLean3, Sarah Boyd1, Kristopher Hoover4, Megan Pollard3, Adam Dubrowski3, Mike Parsons3. 1. Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Health Sciences Center, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada. 2. School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Health Sciences Center, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada. 3. Discipline of Emergency Medicine, Health Sciences Center, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada. 4. Faculty of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Health Sciences Center, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Telemedicine technology contributes to the teaching of point-of-care ultrasound (US); however, expensive equipment can limit its deployment in resource-challenged settings. We assessed 3 low-cost telemedicine solutions capable of supporting remote US training to determine feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness. We also explored the value of instructional videos immediately before telementoring. METHODS:Thirty-six participants were randomly assigned to receive US mentoring in 1 of 3 telemedicine conditions: multiple fixed cameras, a smartphone, and traditional audio with a live US stream. Participants were then asked to perform a standardized US examination of the right upper quadrant under remote guidance. We measured observer's global ratings of performance along with the mentor's and student's rating of effort and satisfaction to determine which of the 3 approaches was most feasible, acceptable, and effective. During the second phase, students were randomized to watch an instructional video or not before receiving remote coaching on how to complete a subxiphoid cardiac examination. Effort, satisfaction, and performance from the independent observer's and student's perspective were surveyed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the different telemedicine setups from the observer's perspective; however, the mentor rated the smartphone significantly worse (P = .028-.04) than other technologies. Platforms were rated equivalent from the student's perspective. No benefit was detected for watching an instructional video before the mentored task. CONCLUSIONS: Remote US skills can be taught equally effectively by using a variety of telemedicine technologies. Smartphones represent a viable option for US training in resource-challenged settings.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Telemedicine technology contributes to the teaching of point-of-care ultrasound (US); however, expensive equipment can limit its deployment in resource-challenged settings. We assessed 3 low-cost telemedicine solutions capable of supporting remote US training to determine feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness. We also explored the value of instructional videos immediately before telementoring. METHODS: Thirty-six participants were randomly assigned to receive US mentoring in 1 of 3 telemedicine conditions: multiple fixed cameras, a smartphone, and traditional audio with a live US stream. Participants were then asked to perform a standardized US examination of the right upper quadrant under remote guidance. We measured observer's global ratings of performance along with the mentor's and student's rating of effort and satisfaction to determine which of the 3 approaches was most feasible, acceptable, and effective. During the second phase, students were randomized to watch an instructional video or not before receiving remote coaching on how to complete a subxiphoid cardiac examination. Effort, satisfaction, and performance from the independent observer's and student's perspective were surveyed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the different telemedicine setups from the observer's perspective; however, the mentor rated the smartphone significantly worse (P = .028-.04) than other technologies. Platforms were rated equivalent from the student's perspective. No benefit was detected for watching an instructional video before the mentored task. CONCLUSIONS: Remote US skills can be taught equally effectively by using a variety of telemedicine technologies. Smartphones represent a viable option for US training in resource-challenged settings.
Authors: Onyinyechi F Eke; Patricia C Henwood; Grace W Wanjiku; Abiola Fasina; Sigmund J Kharasch; Hamid Shokoohi Journal: Int J Emerg Med Date: 2021-02-18
Authors: Elaine Situ-LaCasse; Josie Acuña; Dang Huynh; Richard Amini; Steven Irving; Kara Samsel; Asad E Patanwala; David E Biffar; Srikar Adhikari Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2021-03-20 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Silvia Mongodi; Francesca Bonomi; Rosanna Vaschetto; Chiara Robba; Giulia Salve; Carlo Alberto Volta; Elena Bignami; Luigi Vetrugno; Francesco Corradi; Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore; Paolo Pelosi; Francesco Mojoli Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2022-08-28 Impact factor: 3.263