Pratik Y Chhatbar1, Steven A Kautz2, Istvan Takacs3, Nathan C Rowland3, Gonzalo J Revuelta1, Mark S George4, Marom Bikson5, Wuwei Feng6. 1. Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. 2. Department of Health Science & Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. 4. Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA; Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. 5. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA. 6. Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Health Science & Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. Electronic address: feng@musc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising brain modulation technique for several disease conditions. With this technique, some portion of the current penetrates through the scalp to the cortex and modulates cortical excitability, but a recent human cadaver study questions the amount. This insufficient intracerebral penetration of currents may partially explain the inconsistent and mixed results in tDCS studies to date. Experimental validation of a transcranial alternating current stimulation-generated electric field (EF) in vivo has been performed on the cortical (using electrocorticography, ECoG, electrodes), subcortical (using stereo electroencephalography, SEEG, electrodes) and deeper thalamic/subthalamic levels (using DBS electrodes). However, tDCS-generated EF measurements have never been attempted. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to demonstrate that tDCS generates biologically relevant EF as deep as the subthalamic level in vivo. METHODS: Patients with movement disorders who have implanted deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes serve as a natural experimental model for thalamic/subthalamic recordings of tDCS-generated EF. We measured voltage changes from DBS electrodes and body resistance from tDCS electrodes in three subjects while applying direct current to the scalp at 2 mA and 4 mA over two tDCS montages. RESULTS: Voltage changes at the level of deep nuclei changed proportionally with the level of applied current and varied with different tDCS montages. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that scalp-applied tDCS generates biologically relevant EF. Incorporation of these experimental results may improve finite element analysis (FEA)-based models.
BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising brain modulation technique for several disease conditions. With this technique, some portion of the current penetrates through the scalp to the cortex and modulates cortical excitability, but a recent human cadaver study questions the amount. This insufficient intracerebral penetration of currents may partially explain the inconsistent and mixed results in tDCS studies to date. Experimental validation of a transcranial alternating current stimulation-generated electric field (EF) in vivo has been performed on the cortical (using electrocorticography, ECoG, electrodes), subcortical (using stereo electroencephalography, SEEG, electrodes) and deeper thalamic/subthalamic levels (using DBS electrodes). However, tDCS-generated EF measurements have never been attempted. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to demonstrate that tDCS generates biologically relevant EF as deep as the subthalamic level in vivo. METHODS:Patients with movement disorders who have implanted deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes serve as a natural experimental model for thalamic/subthalamic recordings of tDCS-generated EF. We measured voltage changes from DBS electrodes and body resistance from tDCS electrodes in three subjects while applying direct current to the scalp at 2 mA and 4 mA over two tDCS montages. RESULTS: Voltage changes at the level of deep nuclei changed proportionally with the level of applied current and varied with different tDCS montages. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that scalp-applied tDCS generates biologically relevant EF. Incorporation of these experimental results may improve finite element analysis (FEA)-based models.
Authors: Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur; Andrea Antal; Samar S Ayache; David H Benninger; Jérôme Brunelin; Filippo Cogiamanian; Maria Cotelli; Dirk De Ridder; Roberta Ferrucci; Berthold Langguth; Paola Marangolo; Veit Mylius; Michael A Nitsche; Frank Padberg; Ulrich Palm; Emmanuel Poulet; Alberto Priori; Simone Rossi; Martin Schecklmann; Sven Vanneste; Ulf Ziemann; Luis Garcia-Larrea; Walter Paulus Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2016-10-29 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Alexander Opitz; Arnaud Falchier; Chao-Gan Yan; Erin M Yeagle; Gary S Linn; Pierre Megevand; Axel Thielscher; Ross Deborah A; Michael P Milham; Ashesh D Mehta; Charles E Schroeder Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Mihály Vöröslakos; Yuichi Takeuchi; Kitti Brinyiczki; Tamás Zombori; Azahara Oliva; Antonio Fernández-Ruiz; Gábor Kozák; Zsigmond Tamás Kincses; Béla Iványi; György Buzsáki; Antal Berényi Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 14.919