OBJECTIVE: Though tDCS is well tolerated, it is desirable to further limit the voltage applied for additional safety factors and optimized device design. We investigated the minimum voltage required for tDCS using 1.5 and 2.5mA. METHODS: Impedance data has been collected prior to, during and after 18 tDCS sessions, using 1.5mA and 2.5mA tDCS currents and three different test current magnitudes. Data was pooled and tested for differences using t-tests, corrected for multiple comparisons. Average impedance data was fitted into a RLC circuit model with additional double integrator. RESULTS: We report that the impedance drop during tDCS initiation significantly reduces the voltage compliance required to achieve the target current (14.5V for 1.5mA, 18.5V for 2.5mA). Data was well approximated by a 4th order linear impedance model. CONCLUSION: In addition to indicating the feasibility of reduced voltage tDCS, we propose an extra-low voltage "Limited Total Energy" approach where stimulation is continued at voltage compliance allowing time for impedance to decrease and target current to be reached. SIGNIFICANCE: Reduced-voltage and Limited Total Energy tDCS are viable approaches towards more protective and robust tDCS protocols.
OBJECTIVE: Though tDCS is well tolerated, it is desirable to further limit the voltage applied for additional safety factors and optimized device design. We investigated the minimum voltage required for tDCS using 1.5 and 2.5mA. METHODS: Impedance data has been collected prior to, during and after 18 tDCS sessions, using 1.5mA and 2.5mA tDCS currents and three different test current magnitudes. Data was pooled and tested for differences using t-tests, corrected for multiple comparisons. Average impedance data was fitted into a RLC circuit model with additional double integrator. RESULTS: We report that the impedance drop during tDCS initiation significantly reduces the voltage compliance required to achieve the target current (14.5V for 1.5mA, 18.5V for 2.5mA). Data was well approximated by a 4th order linear impedance model. CONCLUSION: In addition to indicating the feasibility of reduced voltage tDCS, we propose an extra-low voltage "Limited Total Energy" approach where stimulation is continued at voltage compliance allowing time for impedance to decrease and target current to be reached. SIGNIFICANCE: Reduced-voltage and Limited Total Energy tDCS are viable approaches towards more protective and robust tDCS protocols.
Authors: Marom Bikson; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Greg Kronberg; William J Tyler; Andrea Antal; Abhishek Datta; Bernhard A Sabel; Michael A Nitsche; Colleen Loo; Dylan Edwards; Hamed Ekhtiari; Helena Knotkova; Adam J Woods; Benjamin M Hampstead; Bashar W Badran; Angel V Peterchev Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Pratik Y Chhatbar; Steven A Kautz; Istvan Takacs; Nathan C Rowland; Gonzalo J Revuelta; Mark S George; Marom Bikson; Wuwei Feng Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Bernadette T Gillick; Tim Feyma; Jeremiah Menk; Michelle Usset; Amy Vaith; Teddi Jean Wood; Rebecca Worthington; Linda E Krach Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2014-11-20