Julianna D Ianni1,2, Zhipeng Cao1,2, William A Grissom1,2,3,4. 1. Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee. 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee. 3. Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee. 4. Department of Electrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To obviate online slice-by-slice RF shim optimization and reduce B1+ mapping requirements for patient-specific RF shimming in high-field magnetic resonance imaging. THEORY AND METHODS: RF Shim Prediction by Iteratively Projected Ridge Regression (PIPRR) predicts patient-specific, SAR-efficient RF shims with a machine learning approach that merges learning with training shim design. To evaluate it, a set of B1+ maps was simulated for 100 human heads for a 24-element coil at 7T. Features were derived from tissue masks and the DC Fourier coefficients of the coils' B1+ maps in each slice, which were used for kernelized ridge regression prediction of SAR-efficient RF shim weights. Predicted shims were compared to directly designed shims, circularly polarized mode, and nearest-neighbor shims predicted using the same features. RESULTS: PIPRR predictions had 87% and 13% lower B1+ coefficients of variation compared to circularly polarized mode and nearest-neighbor shims, respectively, and achieved homogeneity and SAR similar to that of directly designed shims. Predictions were calculated in 4.92 ms on average. CONCLUSION: PIPRR predicted uniform, SAR-efficient RF shims, and could save a large amount of B1+ mapping and computation time in RF-shimmed ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging.
PURPOSE: To obviate online slice-by-slice RF shim optimization and reduce B1+ mapping requirements for patient-specific RF shimming in high-field magnetic resonance imaging. THEORY AND METHODS: RF Shim Prediction by Iteratively Projected Ridge Regression (PIPRR) predicts patient-specific, SAR-efficient RF shims with a machine learning approach that merges learning with training shim design. To evaluate it, a set of B1+ maps was simulated for 100 human heads for a 24-element coil at 7T. Features were derived from tissue masks and the DC Fourier coefficients of the coils' B1+ maps in each slice, which were used for kernelized ridge regression prediction of SAR-efficient RF shim weights. Predicted shims were compared to directly designed shims, circularly polarized mode, and nearest-neighbor shims predicted using the same features. RESULTS: PIPRR predictions had 87% and 13% lower B1+ coefficients of variation compared to circularly polarized mode and nearest-neighbor shims, respectively, and achieved homogeneity and SAR similar to that of directly designed shims. Predictions were calculated in 4.92 ms on average. CONCLUSION: PIPRR predicted uniform, SAR-efficient RF shims, and could save a large amount of B1+ mapping and computation time in RF-shimmed ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging.
Authors: Qing X Yang; Jinghua Wang; Xiaoliang Zhang; Christopher M Collins; Michael B Smith; Haiying Liu; Xiao-Hong Zhu; J Thomas Vaughan; Kamil Ugurbil; Wei Chen Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Zhenghui Zhang; Chun-Yu Yip; William Grissom; Douglas C Noll; Fernando E Boada; V Andrew Stenger Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Xiaoping Wu; Sebastian Schmitter; Edward J Auerbach; Steen Moeller; Kâmil Uğurbil; Pierre-François Van de Moortele Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-06-25 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Xiaoping Wu; Sebastian Schmitter; Edward J Auerbach; Kâmil Uğurbil; Pierre-François Van de Moortele Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-05-20 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: William A Grissom; Mohammad-Mehdi Khalighi; Laura I Sacolick; Brian K Rutt; Mika W Vogel Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Andreas Christ; Wolfgang Kainz; Eckhart G Hahn; Katharina Honegger; Marcel Zefferer; Esra Neufeld; Wolfgang Rascher; Rolf Janka; Werner Bautz; Ji Chen; Berthold Kiefer; Peter Schmitt; Hans-Peter Hollenbach; Jianxiang Shen; Michael Oberle; Dominik Szczerba; Anthony Kam; Joshua W Guag; Niels Kuster Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Vincent Gras; Markus Boland; Alexandre Vignaud; Guillaume Ferrand; Alexis Amadon; Franck Mauconduit; Denis Le Bihan; Tony Stöcker; Nicolas Boulant Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: M Arcan Erturk; Eric Panken; Mark J Conroy; Jonathan Edmonson; Jeff Kramer; Jacob Chatterton; S Riki Banerjee Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 3.169