Elena K Schneider-Futschik1,2, Olivia K A Paulin1, Daniel Hoyer2,3,4, Kade D Roberts5, James Ziogas2, Mark A Baker6, John Karas2, Jian Li7, Tony Velkov1,2. 1. Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences , Monash University , Parkville , Victoria 3052 , Australia. 2. Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences , The University of Melbourne , Parkville , Victoria 3010 , Australia. 3. The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health , The University of Melbourne , 30 Royal Parade , Parkville , Victoria 3052 , Australia. 4. Department of Molecular Medicine , The Scripps Research Institute , 10550 N. Torrey Pines Road , La Jolla , California 92037 , United States. 5. Medicinal Chemistry, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences , Monash University , Parkville , Victoria 3052 , Australia. 6. Priority Research Centre in Reproductive Science, School of Environmental and Life Sciences , University of Newcastle , Callaghan , New South Wales 2308 , Australia. 7. Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Microbiology , Monash University , Clayton , Victoria 3800 , Australia.
Abstract
The mucoid biofilm mode of growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ( P. aeruginosa) in the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients makes eradication of infections with antibiotic therapy very difficult. The lipopeptide antibiotics polymyxin B and colistin are currently the last-resort therapies for infections caused by multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa. In the present study, we investigated the antibacterial activity of a series of polymyxin lipopeptides (polymyxin B, colistin, FADDI-003, octapeptin A3, and polymyxin A2) against a panel of polymyxin-susceptible and polymyxin-resistant P. aeruginosa cystic fibrosis isolates grown under planktonic or biofilm conditions in artificial sputum and their interactions with sputum component biomolecules. In sputum media under planktonic conditions, the lipopeptides FADDI-003 and octapeptin A3 displayed very promising activity against the polymyxin-resistant isolate FADDI-PA066 (polymyxin B minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) = 32 mg/L), while retaining their activity against the polymyxin-sensitive strains FADDI-PA021 (polymyxin B MIC = 1 mg/L) and FADDI-PA020 (polymyxin B MIC = 2 mg/L). Polymyxin A2 was only effective against the polymyxin-sensitive isolates. However, under biofilm growth conditions, the hydrophobic lipopeptide FADDI-003 was inactive compared to the more hydrophilic lipopeptides, octapeptin A3, polymyxin A2, polymyxin B, and colistin. Transmission electron micrographs revealed octapeptin A3 caused reduction in the cell numbers in biofilm as well as biofilm disruption/"antibiofilm" activity. We therefore assessed the interactions of the lipopeptides with the component sputum biomolecules, mucin, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), surfactant, F-actin, lipopolysaccharide, and phospholipids. We observed the general trend that sputum biomolecules reduce lipopeptide antibacterial activity. Collectively, our data suggests that, in the airways, lipopeptide binding to component sputum biomolecules may reduce antibacterial efficacy and is dependent on the physicochemical properties of the lipopeptide.
The mucoid biofilm mode of growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ( P. aeruginosa) in the lungs of cystic fibrosispatients makes eradication of infections with antibiotic therapy very difficult. The lipopeptide antibiotics polymyxin B and colistin are currently the last-resort therapies for infections caused by multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa. In the present study, we investigated the antibacterial activity of a series of polymyxin lipopeptides (polymyxin B, colistin, FADDI-003, octapeptin A3, and polymyxin A2) against a panel of polymyxin-susceptible and polymyxin-resistant P. aeruginosa cystic fibrosis isolates grown under planktonic or biofilm conditions in artificial sputum and their interactions with sputum component biomolecules. In sputum media under planktonic conditions, the lipopeptidesFADDI-003 and octapeptin A3 displayed very promising activity against the polymyxin-resistant isolate FADDI-PA066 (polymyxin B minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) = 32 mg/L), while retaining their activity against the polymyxin-sensitive strains FADDI-PA021 (polymyxin B MIC = 1 mg/L) and FADDI-PA020 (polymyxin B MIC = 2 mg/L). Polymyxin A2 was only effective against the polymyxin-sensitive isolates. However, under biofilm growth conditions, the hydrophobic lipopeptide FADDI-003 was inactive compared to the more hydrophilic lipopeptides, octapeptin A3, polymyxin A2, polymyxin B, and colistin. Transmission electron micrographs revealed octapeptin A3 caused reduction in the cell numbers in biofilm as well as biofilm disruption/"antibiofilm" activity. We therefore assessed the interactions of the lipopeptides with the component sputum biomolecules, mucin, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), surfactant, F-actin, lipopolysaccharide, and phospholipids. We observed the general trend that sputum biomolecules reduce lipopeptide antibacterial activity. Collectively, our data suggests that, in the airways, lipopeptide binding to component sputum biomolecules may reduce antibacterial efficacy and is dependent on the physicochemical properties of the lipopeptide.
Cystic fibrosis
(CF) is the
most common recessively inherited disease caused by mutations in a
gene that encodes the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)
protein.[1] One of the consequences of a
defective CFTR gating function is the development of thick mucus accumulation
in the lungs which promotes bacterial infections. Approximately 80%
of all CF lung infections in adult patients are caused by the Gram-negative
pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa).[2] Once P. aeruginosa has colonized the CF lung, the infection is nearly impossible to
eradicate. Notably, P. aeruginosa chronic lung
infections are the main cause of death in CF patients.[3]P. aeruginosa is able to switch from
planktonic growth to biofilm growth, which provides tolerance to the
host’s inflammatory defense mechanisms and shields the bacteria
from the aerobic respiratory zone.[3−7] Due to these highly adaptive resistance mechanisms, P. aeruginosa is capable of persisting in the lungs of CF patients irrespective
of their intensive antibiotic treatment regimens.[8−10]The decline
in the development of antibiotics with novel modes
of action, combined with the emergence of Gram-negative pathogens
with multidrug resistance, is of grave concern, particularly for chronic
infections such as P. aeruginosa in the lungs
of CF patients. Polymyxin B and colistin (polymyxin E) are being used
as last-resort therapy against Gram-negative infections.[11] Unfortunately, resistance to polymyxins in both
community and nosocomially acquired infections is increasingly more
common,[12,13] which essentially means limited treatment
options are available for the treatment of life-threatening infections.
This is compounded by the widespread emergence of mobilized colistin
resistance (mcr-1) plasmid-borne polymyxin resistance;
clinicians are now confronted with the reality of Gram-negative infections
that are resistant even to the last line-resort polymyxins.[14−16]Biofilm formation is a major factor that contributes to the
pathophysiology
of P. aeruginosa CF lung infections.[3] Biofilm consists of bacteria interconnected to
extracellular material such as polysaccharides, protein, and deoxyribonucleic
acid (DNA) that together form a matrix.[3] Moreover, the hyper-mutability of P. aeruginosa growing in biofilm promotes the emergence of antibiotic resistance
mutations which are selected for under the pressure of the repeated
courses of antibiotics that CF patients often receive.[3] The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antibiotics
against bacteria growing in biofilm can be up to 1000-fold higher
compared to the same isolate growing planktonically.[3,17−19] The underlying causes may include restricted penetration
of the antibiotic through the recalcitrant biofilm matrix and the
lower metabolic activity of bacteria when growing in biofilm.[3,20]In the present study, we evaluated the activity of a series
of
natural (polymyxin B and A2, colistin, and octapeptin A3) and synthetic (FADDI-003) lipopeptides which display varying
degrees of hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity against P. aeruginosa CF isolates grown under planktonic and biofilm conditions. Furthermore,
we investigated the impact of sputum composite biomolecules (F-actin,
DNA, mucin, phospholipids, surfactant, and lipopolysaccharide [LPS])
on the antipseudomonal activity of the lipopeptides. The present findings
highlight these lipopeptides as promising candidates for development
as inhaled antibiotics for the treatment of problematic P. aeruginosa CF lung infections.
Results and Discussion
The naturally
occurring polymyxins are deca-peptides which carry
five positive charges and display a narrow spectrum against Gram-negative
bacteria.[11] Octapeptins are a unique polymyxin-like
class of cationic octa-peptides that carry only four positive charges.
Moreover, unlike the naturally occurring polymyxins, octapeptins exhibit
a broader spectrum that also includes Gram-positive bacteria, yeast,
protozoa, and filamentous fungi.[21−28]Inhaled polymyxin therapy achieves high local exposure in
the respiratory
tract.[29] Our group has recently demonstrated
that both extrinsic death receptors and intrinsic mitochondrial pathways
are involved in polymyxin induced toxicity in human lung epithelial
A459 cells.[30] Dose-limiting nephrotoxicity
remains the Achilles’ heel of polymyxins which can occur in
up to 60% of patients receiving intravenous polymyxins. Azad et al.
have demonstrated that the coadministration of methionine significantly
ameliorated polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity and decreased mitochondrial
superoxide production in renal tubular cells.[31]In the present study, we examined the antipseudomonal activity
of three polymyxin lipopeptides of varying physiochemical properties,
namely, the hydrophobic FADDI-003 and the more hydrophilic polymyxin
A2 and octapeptin A3; the two clinically used
polymyxins, polymyxin B and colistin, were utilized as comparators
(Figure ). The more
hydrophobic FADDI-003 is a synthetic polymyxin B1 derivative
that differs in an N-terminal biphenylacyl fatty chain and a l-octglycine at position 7 compared to the N-terminal 6-methyloctanoyl
fatty acid chain and l-Leu[7] in
the native polymyxin B1. The more hydrophilic polymyxin
A2 has an N-terminal 6-methylheptanoyl fatty acid chain, d-diaminobutyric acid at position 3, and l-Thr at position
7. The naturally occurring octapeptin A3 has an N-terminal
3-hydroxydecanoyl fatty acid chain, a truncated linear segment with
only a d-diaminobutyric acid at position 3, and an l-Leu at position 10.
Figure 1
Chemical structures of polymyxin B, colistin, FADDI-003,
polymyxin
A2, and octapeptin A3. Structure differences
from the polymyxin B1 core scaffold are shown in red.
Chemical structures of polymyxin B, colistin, FADDI-003,
polymyxin
A2, and octapeptin A3. Structure differences
from the polymyxin B1 core scaffold are shown in red.Previous studies that examined
the sputum penetration of antibiotics
employed a dialysis method to assess the concentration of unbound
antibiotic in the presence of mucin or sputum.[32,33] Here, we have used the more direct approach of measuring the antibacterial
activity of our lipopeptides against P. aeruginosa grown under planktonic vs biofilm conditions in artificial sputum,
and we also examined the impact of individual component sputum biomolecules.The antibacterial activity of the lipopeptides was screened against
a panel of polymyxin-sensitive and -resistant P. aeruginosa CF isolates in standard CAMBH microbiological media (Table ). LipopeptidesFADDI-003 (MICs
2–4 mg/L) and octapeptin A3 (MICs 2–16 mg/L)
showed very promising activity against the polymyxin-resistant isolates
(polymyxin B and colistin MICs 16–128 mg/L), while retaining
activity against polymyxin-sensitive isolates (FADDI-003 and octapeptin
A3 MICs 1–8 mg/L; polymyxin B and colistin MICs
0.25–4 mg/L). Polymyxin A2 displayed similar antibacterial
activity as polymyxin B and colistin against the polymyxin-resistant
isolates (MICs > 32 mg/L) and the polymyxin-sensitive isolates
(MICs
0.25–1 mg/L).
Table 1
In Vitro Antibacterial
Activity of Polymyxin Lipopeptides against CF P. aeruginosa Isolates
minimum inhibitory
concentration (mg/L)
P. aeurignosa isolate
PMBa
COLb
FADDI-003
polymyxin
A2
octapeptin
A3
Polymyxin Susceptible
ATCC 27853
0.5
1
4
0.5
2
FADDI-PA002
0.5
0.25
8
0.25
2
FADDI-PA022
1
1
4
0.5
4
FADDI-PA091
1
0.5
2
0.5
4
FADDI-PA025
2
2
4
1
4
FADDI-PA001
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
4
FADDI-PA038
1
1
4
1
8
FADDI-PA021
2
2
1
<1
2–4
FADDI-PA020
4
4
2
<1
4
Polymyxin Resistant
FADDI-PA092
16
16
4
>32
4
FADDI-PA093
32
32
4
>32
8
FADDI-PA066
32
>128
4
>128
16
FADDI-PA065
>32
>32
4
>32
4
FADDI-PA070
>32
>32
2
>32
2
FADDI-PA069
>32
NA
2
NA
NA
FADDI-PA068
>32
>32
4
>32
2
FADDI-PA062
>32
>32
2
>32
4
FADDI-PA060
>128
>32
2
>32
0.5
PMB: polymyxin B.
COL:
colistin.
PMB: polymyxin B.COL:
colistin.Artificial sputum
media (ASM) closely mimics the sputum of CF patients
and consists of mucin, DNA, surfactant, phospholipids, salt, and amino
acids allowing P. aeruginosa to form microcolonies
and develop biofilm like structures.[34] The
activity of clinically achievable lung concentrations of the lipopeptides
(1–256 mg/L) was tested against the reference strain P. aeruginosa FADDI-PA021 (polymyxin B MIC = 1 mg/L)
and the paired P. aeruginosa CF isolates FADDI-PA020
(polymyxin B MIC = 2 mg/L) and FADDI-PA066 (polymyxin B MIC = 32 mg/L)
under planktonic growth conditions.[29] Against
the polymyxin-sensitive CF isolate FADDI-PA020, all of the lipopeptides
effectively reduced cell viability (reduction to ∼30% cell
viability at 2 mg/L) when grown planktonically in sputum (Figure ). In contrast, against
the polymyxin-resistant CF isolate FADDI-PA066 only FADDI-003 and
octapeptin A3 displayed good activity (reduction to ∼30%
cell viability at 8 mg/L), whereas polymyxin B, A2, and
colistin were inactive even at 128 mg/L (Figure ). In the case of the P. aeruginosa polymyxin-sensitive reference strain FADDI-PA021, all of the lipopeptides
except colistin effectively reduced cell viability when grown planktonically
in sputum (reduction to ∼30% cell viability at 1 mg/L; Figure S1). Overall, these results demonstrate
that the lipopeptides display good activity, particularly octapeptin
A3 and FADDI-003, against P. aeruginosa CF isolates growing planktonically in sputum.
Figure 2
Activity of (A) polymyxin
B, (B) colistin, (C) FADDI-003, (D) polymyxin
A2, and (E) octapeptin A3 against P. aeruginosa CF isolate FADDI-PA020 grown under planktonic conditions in artificial
sputum media. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 3
Activity of (A) polymyxin B, (B) colistin, (C)
FADDI-003, (D) polymyxin
A2, and (E) octapeptin A3 against P. aeruginosa CF isolate FADDI-PA066 grown under planktonic conditions in artificial
sputum media. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3).
Activity of (A) polymyxin
B, (B) colistin, (C) FADDI-003, (D) polymyxin
A2, and (E) octapeptin A3 against P. aeruginosa CF isolate FADDI-PA020 grown under planktonic conditions in artificial
sputum media. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3).Activity of (A) polymyxin B, (B) colistin, (C)
FADDI-003, (D) polymyxin
A2, and (E) octapeptin A3 against P. aeruginosa CF isolate FADDI-PA066 grown under planktonic conditions in artificial
sputum media. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3).The understanding of pharmacokinetic
(PK) and pharmacodynamics
(PD) principles of antibacterial agents provides essential information
for effective dosage regimens and minimizing resistance.[35] However, most PK/PD studies are conducted on
planktonically growing bacteria, and the results do not translate
into biofilm growth conditions commonly seen in the CF lung.[3,36,37] In the next tier of this study,
we investigated the activity of each lipopeptide against the reference
strain P. aeruginosa FADDI-PA021 (polymyxin
B MIC = 1 mg/L) and the paired CF isolates P. aeruginosa FADDI-PA066 (polymyxin B MIC = 32 mg/L) and FADDI-PA020 (polymyxin
B MIC = 2 mg/L) under biofilm formation in a sputum medium. Against
the polymyxin-sensitive CF isolate FADDI-PA020, the more hydrophilic
lipopeptides colistin and polymyxin A2 displayed good activity
(reduction to ∼30% cell viability at 32 mg/L) under biofilm
formation in a sputum medium (Figure ). In contrast, the comparably more hydrophobic lipopeptidesoctapeptin A3 (reduction to ∼25% cell viability
at 64 mg/L), polymyxin B (reduction to ∼50% cell viability
at 128 mg/L), and FADDI-003 (reduction to ∼50% cell viability
at 256 mg/L) were significantly less active. Against the polymyxin-resistant
CF isolate FADDI-PA066, only octapeptin A3 displayed good
activity (reduction to ∼25% cell viability at 32 mg/L) under
biofilm formation in a sputum medium (Figure ). In comparison, polymyxin B (reduction
to ∼40% cell viability at 128 mg/L), colistin (reduction to
∼30% cell viability at 128 mg/L), and polymyxin A2 (reduction to ∼20% cell viability at 128 mg/L) were significantly
less active. FADDI-003 was completely inactive up to 256 mg/L. In
the case of the P. aeruginosa reference strain
FADDI-PA021, polymyxin B (reduction to ∼25% cell viability
at 32 mg/L), colistin (reduction to ∼25% cell viability at
64 mg/L), polymyxin A2 (reduction to ∼45% cell viability
at 32 mg/L), and octapeptin A3 (reduction to ∼45% cell viability
at 32 mg/L) effectively reduced cell viability when grown under biofilm
formation in sputum (Figure S2). FADDI-003
was completely inactive up to 256 mg/L.
Figure 4
Activity of (A) polymyxin
B, (B) colistin, (C) FADDI-003, (D) polymyxin
A2, and (E) octapeptin A3 against P. aeruginosa CF isolate FADDI-PA020 grown under biofilm conditions in artificial
sputum media. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 5
Activity of (A) polymyxin B, (B) colistin, (C)
FADDI-003, (D) polymyxin
A2, and (E) octapeptin A3 against P. aeruginosa CF isolate FADDI-PA066 grown under biofilm conditions in artificial
sputum media. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3).
Activity of (A) polymyxin
B, (B) colistin, (C) FADDI-003, (D) polymyxin
A2, and (E) octapeptin A3 against P. aeruginosa CF isolate FADDI-PA020 grown under biofilm conditions in artificial
sputum media. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3).Activity of (A) polymyxin B, (B) colistin, (C)
FADDI-003, (D) polymyxin
A2, and (E) octapeptin A3 against P. aeruginosa CF isolate FADDI-PA066 grown under biofilm conditions in artificial
sputum media. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3).Interestingly, the very hydrophobic
lipopeptide FADDI-003 was completely
inactive against all the P. aeruginosa isolates
under biofilm conditions (∼100% cell viability at 256 mg/L).
Although FADDI-003 has good activity against both the polymyxin-sensitive
and -resistant isolates under planktonic growth conditions, we postulate
that its poor activity under biofilm conditions is most likely due
to its very hydrophobic physicochemical characteristics which inhibit
its ability to diffuse through the outer biofilm layer. In line with
this postulate, it has been show that the increment of hydrophobicity
decreases the diffusion kinetics of nanoparticles in mucus.[38]In line with our ASM results, transmission
electron microscopy
imaging of P. aeruginosa FADDI-PA066 cells growing
in biofilm revealed that octapeptin A3 treatment (16 mg/L;
1× MIC) reduced the cell numbers as well as exerting “antibiofilm”
activity/biofilm disruption compared to biofilms treated with colistin
(128 mg/L; 1× MIC) (Figure ). Notably, treatment with octapeptin A3 produced a drastic disruption of the bacterial outer membrane structure
with the loss of intracellular contents. This is in stark contrast
from the cells treated with colistin wherein a blebbing effect with
vesicular protrusions from the outer membrane is observed that is
associated with polymyxin exposure of Gram-negative cells (Figure ).[39] The untreated cells exhibited no membrane disruption.
Figure 6
Electron
microscopy images (magnification: left, 5 μm; right,
500 nm) of biofilm disruption of the polymyxin-resistant P. aeruginosa CF isolate FADDI-PA066 (A) untreated or treated with the respective
1× MIC: (B) colistin (128 mg/L); (C) octapeptin A3 (16 mg/L).
Electron
microscopy images (magnification: left, 5 μm; right,
500 nm) of biofilm disruption of the polymyxin-resistant P. aeruginosa CF isolate FADDI-PA066 (A) untreated or treated with the respective
1× MIC: (B) colistin (128 mg/L); (C) octapeptin A3 (16 mg/L).Sputum significantly
inhibits the antibacterial activity of tobramycin,
an aminoglycoside antibiotic commonly used via inhalation for the
treatment of P. aeruginosa lung infections in
CF patients.[40] Moreover, it has been shown
that the activity of the lipopeptide antibiotic daptomycin is inhibited
by pulmonary biomolecules such as surfactant.[41] Hence, we hypothesized that binding of the lipopeptides to sputum
component biomolecules reduces their antibacterial activity. Previous
studies aimed at determining the impact of sputum components on antibiotic
binding examined mucin, glycoproteins, or DNA using radioenzymatic
assays, MIC determination, or immunofluorescence.[33,40,42,43] In the present
study, we examined the impact of each individual sputum biomolecule
(F-actin, DNA, phospholipids, surfactant, mucin, and LPS) in CAMBH
media on the activity of our lipopeptides (Figures S3–S5). We tested the activity of the lipopeptides at
2 mg/L in combination with a sputum biomolecule at 125 mg/L against P. aeruginosa strains FADDI-PA020 (polymyxin B MIC
= 2 mg/L) and FADDI-PA066 (polymyxin B MIC = 32 mg/L) and the reference
strain FADDI-PA021 (polymyxin B MIC = 1 mg/L).Mucins are high
molecular weight (0.5–40 MDa) highly glycosylated
proteins.[44,45] Apart from chronic obstruction pulmonary
disease and CF patients, who express very high mucin levels, the mucin
content in healthy individuals ranges from 2% to 5% by weight of lung
mucus.[44−47] The addition of 50% (w/v) mucin to the bacterial growth media at
levels relevant to the CF diseased state[48] produced a marked decrease in the antibacterial activity of all
of the lipopeptides against the two polymyxin-susceptible P. aeruginosa strains FADDI-PA020 and FADDI-PA021 (Figures S3 and S4). Similarly, against the polymyxin-resistant
strain FADDI-PA066, mucin reduced the antibacterial activity of FADDI-003,
polymyxin A2, and octapeptin A3; the impact
of mucin on the activity of polymyxin B and colistin was not noticeable
as these lipopeptides are inactive against this strain (Figure S5). These findings are in line with the
previous report from Huang et al., who employed dialysis to show that
colistin and polymyxin B avidly bind to mucin.[32]P. aeruginosa CF lung infection
and biofilm
formation induces an inflammatory response and a neutrophil-rich environment.[49] F-actin/DNA bundles released from necrotic neutrophils
stimulate biofilm formation by P. aeruginosa and are major components of the biofilm matrix itself.[50] F-actin/DNA inhibited the activity of FADDI-003
against the polymyxin-sensitive isolate FADDI-PA020, whereas the activity
of polymyxin B, colistin, polymyxin A2, and octapeptin
A3 was only marginally affected (Figures S3 and S4). Conversely, F-actin/DNA inhibited the activity
of polymyxin B, colistin, polymyxin A2, and octapeptin
A3 against the polymyxin-sensitive isolate FADDI-PA021,
whereas the activity of FADDI-003 was unaffected. F-actin/DNA marginally
inhibited the activity of polymyxin B against the polymyxin-resistant
FADDI-PA066 but substantially inhibited the activity of polymyxin
A2 and octapeptin A3. There was no impact on
the activity of colistin and FADDI-003 (Figure S5). The addition of DNA per se to the growth
media marginally impacted the activity of polymyxin B and colistin
against the polymyxin-sensitive strains FADDI-PA020 and FADDI-PA021,
whereas the activity of FADDI-003, polymyxin A2, and octapeptin
A3 was significantly inhibited (Figures S3 and S4). A similar trend was evident in the case of the
polymyxin-resistant strain FADDI-066 (Figure S5).The primary mode of action of polymyxins involves an initial
binding
event to the lipid A portion of LPS in the Gram-negative outer membrane;[51] it is also well-known that isolated LPS avidly
binds to polymyxins.[52,53] Considering that LPS is a key
component of bacterial biofilm, we examined the impact of LPS addition
to the growth media on the activity of each lipopeptide. Not surprisingly,
LPS almost completely inactivated all of the lipopeptides’
effects against all three strains (Figures S3–S5).The addition of phospholipids to the growth media significantly
impacted the activity of each lipopeptide against both the polymyxin-sensitive
isolates FADDI-PA020 and FADDI-PA021 (Figures S3 and S4). In contrast, when treating the polymyxin-resistant
strain FADDI-PA066, phospholipids only marginally impacted the activity
of FADDI-003, polymyxin A2, and octapeptin A3, whereas the impact on the activity of polymyxin B and colistin
was not discernible (Figure S5).Pulmonary surfactant is a complex surface-active mixture of phospholipids
and proteins that forms a film that lines the alveolar air–surface
interface.[41,54] Notably, it has been reported
that pulmonary surfactant interacts with and inhibits the antibacterial
activity of the lipopeptide daptomycin, which precludes it clinical
use for the treatment of pneumonia.[41] Moreover,
cationic peptides have been shown to electrostatically interact with
surfactant lipids and inhibit the surface activity of pulmonary surfactant,
possibly by the formation of a mixed lipid-polyamino acid film.[41] The addition of bovine pulmonary surfactant
to the growth media significantly inhibited the antibacterial activity
of each lipopeptide against all three strains; in addition, the inhibition
was more pronounced against the two polymyxin-sensitive isolates (Figures S3–S5).
Conclusions
There
is a major unmet medical need for effective antibiotic therapies
with minimal adverse effects for lung infections in CF patients. In
the early stages of P. aeruginosa CF lung colonization,
a nonmucoid planktonic (nonbiofilm) form of growth predominately exists,
which can be eradicated with most current antibiotic treatment.[55−57] However, recurrent P. aeruginosa CF lung infections
often transition to the mucoid form (biofilm), which are resistant
to current antibiotics.[55,58] Hence, the development
of next generation polymyxin lipopeptides targeting P. aeruginosa CF lung infections is paramount if we are to provide effective therapies.
Sputum binding in the airways is known to reduce the antibacterial
efficacy of inhaled lipopeptide antibiotics such as colistin.[59] The polymyxin lipopeptides described herein
were proven to have good antibacterial activity against polymyxin-sensitive
and polymyxin-resistant P. aeruginosa CF isolates
growing in sputum. Moreover, our data highlighted that specific sputum
component biomolecules can sequester the antibacterial activity of
more hydrophobic lipopeptides. Overall, the present study lays the
foundations for the development of these lipopeptides as antibiotics
to treat life-threatening multidrug resistance (MDR) P. aeruginosa CF lung infections.
Experimental Section
Lipopeptides
were prepared in Milli-Q water (Millipore, Australia)
and then filtered through 0.22 μm syringe filters (Sartorius,
Australia). Bovine pulmonary surfactant (beractant) was obtained from
Abbvie (Australia). Lipopeptides were synthesized as previously described
in detail.[60,61] All other reagents were of the
highest commercial grade available (Sigma-Aldrich Australia).A range of P. aeruginosa isolates, including
CF specific isolates, were selected for the initial susceptibility
testing (Table ).
Paired polymyxin-susceptible and -resistant P. aeruginosa CF clinical isolates (FADDI-PA020 [polymyxin B MIC = 2 mg/L]; FADDI-PA066
[polymyxin B MIC = 32 mg/L]) were used in the artificial sputum assays.[62] A polymyxin-susceptible reference strain, FADDI-PA021
(polymyxin B MIC = 1 mg/L), was also tested. Resistance to polymyxin
B was defined as MICs of >4 mg/L, according to the European Committee
on Antimicrobial Susceptibilty Testing (EUCAST) clinical breakpoints.[63]Bacteria were stored at −80 °C
in tryptone soya broth
(Oxoid, Australia) and subcultured onto nutrient agar plates (Medium
Preparation Unit, University of Melbourne, Australia). The overnight
broth cultures were grown in 5 mL of cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton
broth (CAMHB, Oxoid, Australia), from which a 1 in 100 dilution was
made in fresh broth (midlogarithmic cultures; optical density (OD)
at 500 nm = 0.4 to 0.6). Cultures were incubated at 37 °C in
a shaking water bath (180 rpm).Minimum inhibitory concentration
(MIC) assays for each lipopeptide
against a range of CF isolates were conducted according to the Clinical
and Laboratory Standards Institute (Table ).[64] CAMHB in
96-well polypropylene microtiter plates was used for all MIC experiments.
Bacterial suspensions (100 μL in CAMHB containing 106 colony forming units [CFU]/mL) and increasing concentrations of
a lipopeptide (0 to 256 mg/L) were inoculated into the well containing
100 μL of CAMHB. The lowest concentration at which visible growth
was inhibited following 18 h of incubation at 37 °C was defined
as the MIC. For cell viability, wells were determined by sampling
wells at lipopeptide concentrations greater than the MIC. The samples
were diluted in saline and plated onto nutrient agar. Following incubation
at 37 °C for 20 h, the CFU was determined; the limit of detection
was 10 CFU/mL.The artificial sputum media assays (ASM) were
performed with the
paired P. aeruginosa strains FADDI-PA020 (polymyxin
B MIC = 2 mg/L) and FADDI-PA066 (polymyxin B MIC = 32 mg/L); FADDI-PA021
(polymyxin B MIC = 1 mg/L) was used as the reference strain. The ASM
assays were performed in a 24-well plate format. ASM faithfully mimics
CF patient sputum as described in detail by Kirchner et al.[65] and O’Callaghan et al.[66] In brief, 4 g of salmon sperm DNA and 5 g of mucin from
porcine stomach were slowly dissolved overnight in 250 mL of sterile
Milli-Q water. Then, the DNA/mucin solution was combined with 0.25
g of each essential and nonessential l-amino acid in 100
mL of sterile water (l-alanine, l-arginine, l(+)-asparagine monohydrate, l(+)-aspartic acid, l(+)-glutamic acid, l-glutamine, glycine, l-histidine, l-isoleucine, l-leucine, l(+)-lysine monohydrochloride, l-methionine, l-phenylalanine, l-proline, l-serine, l-threonine, l(−)-tryptophan, and l-valine) (exception: dissolve
0.25 g of each l-cysteine in 25 mL of 0.5 M potassium hydroxide
and l-tyrosine in 25 mL of sterile water), 5.9 mg of diethylenetriaminepentaacetic
acid (DTPA), 5 g of NaCl, 2.2 g of KCl in 100 mL of sterile water,
and 5 mL of egg yolk emulsion. Subsequently, pH was adjusted to 6.9
with 1 M Tris (pH 8.5), and the volume was brought up to 1 L with
sterile water. The ASM was then filter sterilized at 4 °C in
the dark using a Vacuubrand ME 2 diaphragm vacuum pump and Millipore
Steritop filter units (pore and neck size of 0.22 μm and 45
mm).[65]P. aeruginosa isolates were subcultured onto nutrient agar plates and incubated
at 37 °C overnight. A randomly selected colony of each isolate
was grown overnight in 10 mL of CAMBH at 37 °C. CAMBH was used
to dilute the overnight culture to an OD of ∼0.05 and then
subsequently diluted 1:100 in fresh ASM. The total volume in each
well was 2 mL. Parafilm was used to secure plates which were then
incubated for 3 days aerobically at 37 °C, wherein the P. aeruginosa biofilms were developed. After 3 days,
lipopeptides were added at concentrations ranging from 8 to 256 mg/L
and incubated for a further 24 h. Disruption of the biofilm was performed
enzymatically [100 μL of 100 mg/mL cellulase (pH adjusted to
4.6 with NaOH; diluted in 9.6 g/L citrate], and then, it was incubated
for 1 h at 37 °C. Pipetting was employed to further manually
disrupt the biofilms. Resazurin was added to each well [100 μL
of 0.02% (v/v)], and the wells were further incubated for 2 h at 37
°C. Four replicates were conducted. ENVISION plate reader (PerkinElmer,
Australia) set at an excitation wavelength of 530 nm and an emission
wavelength of 590 nm was used to measure fluorescence. The cell viability
was calculated as (mean fluorescence of lipopeptide treated wells/mean
fluorescence untreated control wells) × 100%.Transmission
electron microscopy was conducted as previously described.[67,68] In brief, one colony of P. aeruginosa FADDI-PA066
was randomly selected and used to prepare a biofilm culture of which
10 mL of log-phase cultures (at ∼108 CFU/mL) in
CAMHB were obtained. The tubes were treated with 128 mg/L colistin
or 16 mg/L octapeptin A3 and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C
followed by centrifugation
at 3220 g for 10 min. Bacterial cells were fixed with
2.5% glutaraldehyde, washed, and imaged as described in detail.[67,68]Isolates were subcultured on nutrient agar plates and then
incubated
at 37 °C overnight. A randomly selected colony was grown overnight
in 10 mL of CAMBH at 37 °C. The overnight culture was then grown
in 10 mL of CAMHB, from which a 1 in 100 dilution was performed in
fresh broth to prepare midlogarithmic cultures with OD500 nm = 0.4–0.6. All broth cultures were incubated at 37 °C
in a shaking water bath (180 rpm). The culture was diluted in CAMBH
to an OD of ∼0.05. Sputum composite biomolecules at concentrations
of 125 mg/L (F-actin/DNA, DNA, mucin [MUC], phospholipids [PL], surfactant
[SUR], or LPS) were coincubated in a 24-well plate for 3 h with lipopeptides
at a concentration of 2 mg/L. A sample was taken from each well, plated
using a spiral plater, and further incubated overnight at 37 °C.
A ProtoCOL automated colony counter (Synbiosis, Cambridge, United
Kingdom) was used to count colonies; the detection limit was 10 CFU/mL.
Authors: Jian Li; Roger L Nation; John D Turnidge; Robert W Milne; Kingsley Coulthard; Craig R Rayner; David L Paterson Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Rachel L Soon; Tony Velkov; Francis Chiu; Philip E Thompson; Rashmi Kancharla; Kade Roberts; Ian Larson; Roger L Nation; Jian Li Journal: Anal Biochem Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 3.365
Authors: E Meyers; F E Pansy; H I Basch; R J McRipley; D S Slusarchyk; S F Graham; W H Trejo Journal: J Antibiot (Tokyo) Date: 1973-08 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Jared A Silverman; Lawrence I Mortin; Andrew D G Vanpraagh; Tongchuan Li; Jeff Alder Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2005-05-05 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Daniel Ben Hur; Gal Kapach; Naiem Ahmad Wani; Edo Kiper; Moshe Ashkenazi; Gill Smollan; Natan Keller; Ori Efrati; Yechiel Shai Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 8.039