Literature DB >> 29566420

Evaluation of Inter-System Variability in Liver Stiffness Measurements.

Giovanna Ferraioli1, Annalisa De Silvestri2, Raffaella Lissandrin1, Laura Maiocchi1, Carmine Tinelli2, Carlo Filice1, Richard G Barr3.   

Abstract

AIM: The primary aim of this study was to determine the inter-system variability of liver stiffness measurements (LSMs) in patients with varying degrees of liver stiffness. The secondary aim was to determine the inter-observer variability of measurements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 21 individuals affected by chronic hepatitis C and 5 healthy individuals were prospectively enrolled. The assessment of LSMs was performed using six ultrasound (US) systems, four of which with point shear wave elastography (p-SWE) and two with 2 D shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) systems. The Fibroscan (Echosens, France) was used as the reference standard. Four observers performed the measurements in pairs (A-B, C-D). The agreement between different observers or methods was calculated using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. The Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated as well.
RESULTS: There was agreement above 0.80 for all pairs of systems. The mean difference between the values of the systems with 2D-SWE technique was 1.54 kPa, whereas the maximum mean difference between the values of three out of four systems with the pSWE technique was 0.79 kPa. The intra-patient concordance for all systems was 0.89 (95 % CI: 0.83 - 0.94). Inter-observer agreement was 0.96 (95 % CI: 0.94 - 0.98) for the pair of observers A-B and 0.93 (95 % CI: 0.89 - 0.96) for the pair of observers C-D.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that the agreement between LSMs performed with different US systems is good to excellent and the overall inter-observer agreement in "ideal conditions" is above 0.90 in expert hands. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29566420     DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-124184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultraschall Med        ISSN: 0172-4614            Impact factor:   6.548


  9 in total

1.  A New Multimodel Machine Learning Framework to Improve Hepatic Fibrosis Grading Using Ultrasound Elastography Systems from Different Vendors.

Authors:  Isabelle Durot; Alireza Akhbardeh; Hersh Sagreiya; Andreas M Loening; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Shear wave elastography using sound touch elastography and supersonic shear imaging for liver measurements: a comparative study.

Authors:  Hongjin Xiang; Wenwu Ling; Lin Ma; Lulu Yang; Tang Lin; Yan Luo
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-05

3.  Liver cirrhosis in children - the role of imaging in the diagnostic pathway.

Authors:  Jochen Herrmann; Philippe Petit; Enke Grabhorn; Alexander Lenz; Julian Jürgens; Stéphanie Franchi-Albella
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2022-08-30

Review 4.  Liver fibrosis assessment: MR and US elastography.

Authors:  Arinc Ozturk; Michael C Olson; Anthony E Samir; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-10-23

5.  Does Early Diabetic Kidney Damage Alter Renal Elasticity? An Ultrasound-Based, Two-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography Study.

Authors:  Nesrin Gunduz; Aysenur Buz; Adnan Kabaalioglu
Journal:  Medeni Med J       Date:  2021-09-30

6.  The prevalence of alcoholic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in adolescents and young adults in the United States: analysis of the NHANES database.

Authors:  Naim Alkhouri; Ashraf Almomani; Phuc Le; Julia Y Payne; Imad Asaad; Celine Sakkal; Miriam Vos; Mazen Noureddin; Prabhat Kumar
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 2.847

7.  Comparison of point and two-dimensional shear wave elastography of the spleen in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Friederike Nowotny; Julian Schmidberger; Patrycja Schlingeloff; Andreas Binzberger; Wolfgang Kratzer
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-28

Review 8.  Ultrasound-based liver elastography: current results and future perspectives.

Authors:  Cheng Fang; Paul S Sidhu
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-11

9.  Shear wave speed measurement bias in a viscoelastic phantom across six ultrasound elastography systems: a comparative study with transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Riwa Kishimoto; Mikio Suga; Masashi Usumura; Hiroko Iijima; Masahiro Yoshida; Hiroyuki Hachiya; Tsuyoshi Shiina; Makoto Yamakawa; Kei Konno; Takayuki Obata; Tadashi Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 1.878

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.