Literature DB >> 29565642

Matrix-Applied Characterized Autologous Cultured Chondrocytes Versus Microfracture: Five-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial.

Mats Brittberg1, David Recker2, John Ilgenfritz3, Daniel B F Saris4,5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Matrix-based cell therapy improves surgical handling, increases patient comfort, and allows for expanded indications with better reliability within the knee joint. Five-year efficacy and safety of autologous cultured chondrocytes on porcine collagen membrane (MACI) versus microfracture for treating cartilage defects have not yet been reported from any randomized controlled clinical trial.
PURPOSE: To examine the clinical efficacy and safety results at 5 years after treatment with MACI and compare these with the efficacy and safety of microfracture treatment for symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
METHODS: This article describes the 5-year follow-up of the SUMMIT (Superiority of MACI Implant Versus Microfracture Treatment) clinical trial conducted at 14 study sites in Europe. All 144 patients who participated in SUMMIT were eligible to enroll; analyses of the 5-year data were performed with data from patients who signed informed consent and continued in the Extension study.
RESULTS: Of the 144 patients randomized in the SUMMIT trial, 128 signed informed consent and continued observation in the Extension study: 65 MACI (90.3%) and 63 microfracture (87.5%). The improvements in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain and Function domains previously described were maintained over the 5-year follow-up. Five years after treatment, the improvement in MACI over microfracture in the co-primary endpoint of KOOS pain and function was maintained and was clinically and statistically significant ( P = .022). Improvements in activities of daily living remained statistically significantly better ( P = .007) in MACI patients, with quality of life and other symptoms remaining numerically higher in MACI patients but losing statistical significance relative to the results of the SUMMIT 2-year analysis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of structural repair was performed in 120 patients at year 5. As in the 2-year SUMMIT (MACI00206) results, the MRI evaluation showed improvement in defect filling for both treatments; however, no statistically significant differences were noted between treatment groups.
CONCLUSION: Symptomatic cartilage knee defects 3 cm2 or larger treated with MACI were clinically and statistically significantly improved at 5 years compared with microfracture treatment. No remarkable adverse events or safety issues were noted in this heterogeneous patient population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cartilage repair; clinical outcomes; knee; matrix-applied characterized autologous cultured chondrocytes (MACI) implant; microfracture

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29565642     DOI: 10.1177/0363546518756976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  53 in total

Review 1.  Surgical Management of Osteochondral Defects of the Knee: An Educational Review.

Authors:  Matthew Howell; Quintin Liao; Christopher W Gee
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2021-02-15

2.  Microfracture for cartilage repair in the knee: a systematic review of the contemporary literature.

Authors:  Patrick Orth; Liang Gao; Henning Madry
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  An in vitro and in vivo comparison of cartilage growth in chondrocyte-laden matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels with localized transforming growth factor β3.

Authors:  Margaret C Schneider; Stanley Chu; Mark A Randolph; Stephanie J Bryant
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 4.  Management of the Failed OCD.

Authors:  Crystal A Perkins; S Clifton Willimon
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-04

5.  Development of an Ex Vivo Murine Osteochondral Repair Model.

Authors:  Thomas J A van Schaik; Florian Gaul; Erik W Dorthé; Emily E Lee; Shawn P Grogan; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Safety and efficacy of matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation with spheroid technology is independent of spheroid dose after 4 years.

Authors:  Philipp Niemeyer; Volker Laute; Wolfgang Zinser; Thilo John; Christoph Becher; Peter Diehl; Thomas Kolombe; Jakob Fay; Rainer Siebold; Stefan Fickert
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Cartiform Implantation for focal cartilage defects in the knee: A 2-year clinical and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study.

Authors:  Craig H Bennett; Vidushan Nadarajah; Michelle C Moore; Julio J Jauregui; Andrew G Dubina; Cameran Burt; Derik L Davis; Arvinder Uppal; R Frank Henn
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-23

Review 8.  Managing Chondral Lesions: A Literature Review and Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines.

Authors:  Sumit Banerjee; K Santosh Sahanand
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Treatment of Unicompartmental Cartilage Defects of the Knee with Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty, Patellofemoral Partial Knee Arthroplasty or Focal Resurfacing.

Authors:  Bernhard Springer; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27

10.  Role of Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation with Spheroids in the Treatment of Large Chondral Defects in the Knee: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lucienne Angela Vonk; Giulietta Roël; Jacques Hernigou; Christian Kaps; Philippe Hernigou
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.