Literature DB >> 31897548

Safety and efficacy of matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation with spheroid technology is independent of spheroid dose after 4 years.

Philipp Niemeyer1,2, Volker Laute3, Wolfgang Zinser4, Thilo John5, Christoph Becher6, Peter Diehl7, Thomas Kolombe8, Jakob Fay9, Rainer Siebold10, Stefan Fickert11,12.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of product dose in autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the knee and to assess its influence on clinical and morphological mid-term outcome.
METHODS: Seventy-five patients were included in this single-blind, randomised, prospective, controlled clinical trial. Patients were assigned randomly to three different dose groups [low (3-7 spheroids/cm2), medium (10-30 spheroids/cm2), or high (40-70 spheroids/cm2)] and assessed using standardised clinical and morphological scoring systems (KOOS, IKDC, MOCART) for 4 years following the intervention.
RESULTS: The analysis population comprised 75 patients (22 women, 53 men) aged 34 ± 9 years. Defect sizes ranged from 2 to 10 cm2 following intraoperative debridement. The assessment of the primary variable 'overall KOOS' showed a statistically significant improvement, compared with baseline, for each dose group, i.e., at baseline the mean 'overall KOOS' scores were 60.4 ± 13.6, 59.6 ± 15.4, and 51.1 ± 15.4 for the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups, respectively, and 57.0 ± 15.2 for 'all patients'. After 48 months those values improved to 80.0 ± 14.7, 84.0 ± 14.9, and 66.9 ± 21.5 in the respective dose groups and 77.1 ± 18.6 for 'all patients'. Pairwise comparisons of these dose groups did not reveal any statistically significant differences. Likewise, assessment of the subjective IKDC score revealed no statistically significant differences between the three dose groups up to the 48-month visit. However, between 12 and 48 months there was a low, but steady, improvement in the low-dose group and a substantial amelioration in the medium-dose group. The mean MOCART total scores 3 months after treatment were 59.8 ± 10.9, 64.5 ± 10.3, and 64.7 ± 9.4 for the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups, and 62.9 ± 10.3 for 'all patients'; 48 months after treatment these were 73.9 ± 13.1, 78.0 ± 12.4, and 74.3 ± 14.0 for the respective dose groups and 75.5 ± 13.1 for 'all patients'.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study confirm the efficacy and safety of the applied "advanced therapy medicinal product"; no dose dependence was found either for the incidence or for the severity of any adverse reactions. All doses applied in the present study led to significant clinical improvement over time and can therefore be regarded as effective doses. The influence of product doses in the range investigated seems to be low and can be neglected. Thus, the authorised dose range of 10-70 spheroids/cm2 confirmed by this clinical trial offers a broad therapeutic window for the surgeon applying the product, thereby reducing the risk of over- or underdosing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autologous chondrocyte implantation; Cartilage lesion; Knee surgery; Patella; Randomised clinical trial

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31897548     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05786-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  42 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) for the evaluation of autologous chondrocyte transplantation: determination of interobserver variability and correlation to clinical outcome after 2 years.

Authors:  Stefan Marlovits; Philipp Singer; Philip Zeller; Irena Mandl; Jörg Haller; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 2.  [A comprehensive assessment of ATMP. Difficulties and approaches].

Authors:  M Thanner; E Nagel
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 3.  Failures, re-operations, and complications after autologous chondrocyte implantation--a systematic review.

Authors:  J D Harris; R A Siston; R H Brophy; C Lattermann; J L Carey; D C Flanigan
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee.

Authors:  S Ahlbäck; G C Bauer; W H Bohne
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1968-12

Review 5.  Advanced cell therapies for articular cartilage regeneration.

Authors:  Catarina Madeira; Aruna Santhagunam; João B Salgueiro; Joaquim M S Cabral
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 19.536

6.  Cell quality affects clinical outcome after MACI procedure for cartilage injury of the knee.

Authors:  Matthias F Pietschmann; Annie Horng; Thomas Niethammer; Isa Pagenstert; Birte Sievers; Volkmar Jansson; Christian Glaser; Peter E Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Validation of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for the treatment of focal cartilage lesions.

Authors:  J E J Bekkers; Th S de Windt; N J H Raijmakers; W J A Dhert; D B F Saris
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee: characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better clinical outcome at 36 months in a randomized trial compared to microfracture.

Authors:  Daniel B F Saris; Johan Vanlauwe; Jan Victor; Karl Fredrik Almqvist; Rene Verdonk; Johan Bellemans; Frank P Luyten
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Treatment of "patellofemoral" cartilage lesions with matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation: a comparison of patellar and trochlear lesions.

Authors:  Giuseppe Filardo; Elizaveta Kon; Luca Andriolo; Alessandro Di Martino; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Increasing the Dose of Autologous Chondrocytes Improves Articular Cartilage Repair: Histological and Molecular Study in the Sheep Animal Model.

Authors:  Pedro Guillén-García; Elena Rodríguez-Iñigo; Isabel Guillén-Vicente; Rosa Caballero-Santos; Marta Guillén-Vicente; Stephen Abelow; Guillermo Giménez-Gallego; Juan Manuel López-Alcorocho
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  9 in total

1.  Sustained superiority in KOOS subscores after matrix-associated chondrocyte implantation using spheroids compared to microfracture.

Authors:  Arnd Hoburg; Philipp Niemeyer; Volker Laute; Wolfgang Zinser; Christoph Becher; Thomas Kolombe; Jakob Fay; Stefan Pietsch; Tomasz Kuźma; Wojciech Widuchowski; Stefan Fickert
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 4.114

Review 2.  Three-dimensional, Scaffold-Free, Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Moritz Riedl; Gianluca Vadalà; Rocco Papalia; Vincenco Denaro
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-09-21

3.  Treatment of Large Cartilage Defects in the Knee by Hydrogel-Based Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation: Two-Year Results of a Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm Phase III Trial.

Authors:  P Niemeyer; M Hanus; J Belickas; T László; R Gudas; M Fiodorovas; A Cebatorius; M Pastucha; P Hoza; K Magos; K Izadpanah; L Paša; G Vásárhelyi; K Sisák; M Mohyla; C Farkas; O Kessler; S Kybal; R Spiro; A Köhler; A Kirner; S Trattnig; C Gaissmaier
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Influence of the Mechanical Environment on the Regeneration of Osteochondral Defects.

Authors:  Sarah Davis; Marta Roldo; Gordon Blunn; Gianluca Tozzi; Tosca Roncada
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-27

5.  Safety and Efficacy of Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation With Spheroids for Patellofemoral or Tibiofemoral Defects: A 5-Year Follow-up of a Phase 2, Dose-Confirmation Trial.

Authors:  Arnd Hoburg; Philipp Niemeyer; Volker Laute; Wolfgang Zinser; Thilo John; Christoph Becher; Kaywan Izadpanah; Peter Diehl; Thomas Kolombe; Jakob Fay; Rainer Siebold; Stefan Fickert
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-01-18

Review 6.  Therapeutic strategies of three-dimensional stem cell spheroids and organoids for tissue repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Woochan Kim; Yonghyun Gwon; Sunho Park; Hyoseong Kim; Jangho Kim
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 7.  Progress of Platelet Derivatives for Cartilage Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Siyu Wu; Wenlai Guo; Rui Li; Xi Zhang; Wenrui Qu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-16

8.  Role of Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation with Spheroids in the Treatment of Large Chondral Defects in the Knee: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lucienne Angela Vonk; Giulietta Roël; Jacques Hernigou; Christian Kaps; Philippe Hernigou
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Freeze-Dried Curdlan/Whey Protein Isolate-Based Biomaterial as Promising Scaffold for Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation-A Pilot In-Vitro Study.

Authors:  Katarzyna Klimek; Marta Tarczynska; Wieslaw Truszkiewicz; Krzysztof Gaweda; Timothy E L Douglas; Grazyna Ginalska
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 6.600

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.