Literature DB >> 29565595

Extending the Compatibility of the SP3 Paramagnetic Bead Processing Approach for Proteomics.

Sophie Moggridge1,2, Poul H Sorensen3, Gregg B Morin1,4, Christopher S Hughes1.   

Abstract

The diversity in protein and peptide biochemistry necessitates robust protocols and reagents for efficiently handling and enriching these molecules prior to analysis with mass spectrometry (MS) or other techniques. Further exploration of the paramagnetic bead-based approach, single-pot solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation (SP3), is carried out toward updating and extending previously described conditions and experimental workflows. The SP3 approach was tested in a wide range of experimental scenarios, including (1) binding solvents (acetonitrile, ethanol, isopropanol, acetone), (2) binding pH (acidic vs neutral), (3) solvent/lysate ratios (50-200%, v/v), (4) mixing and rinsing conditions (on-rack vs off-rack rinsing), (5) Enrichment of nondenatured proteins, and (6) capture of individual proteins from noncomplex mixtures. These results highlight the robust handling of proteins in a broad set of scenarios while also enabling the development of a modified SP3 workflow that offers extended compatibility. The modified SP3 approach is used in quantitative in-depth proteome analyses to compare it with commercial paramagnetic bead-based HILIC methods (MagReSyn) and across multiple binding conditions (e.g., pH and solvent during binding). Together, these data reveal the extensive quantitative coverage of the proteome possible with SP3 independent of the binding approach utilized. The results further establish the utility of SP3 for the unbiased handling of peptides and proteins for proteomic applications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HILIC; SP3; mass spectrometry; protein cleanup

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29565595     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  56 in total

1.  Toward a Consensus on Applying Quantitative Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Proteomics in Translational Pharmacology Research: A White Paper.

Authors:  Bhagwat Prasad; Brahim Achour; Per Artursson; Cornelis E C A Hop; Yurong Lai; Philip C Smith; Jill Barber; Jacek R Wisniewski; Daniel Spellman; Yasuo Uchida; Michael A Zientek; Jashvant D Unadkat; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  SP2: Rapid and Automatable Contaminant Removal from Peptide Samples for Proteomic Analyses.

Authors:  Matthew Waas; Michael Pereckas; Rachel A Jones Lipinski; Christopher Ashwood; Rebekah L Gundry
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  TEX264 Is an Endoplasmic Reticulum-Resident ATG8-Interacting Protein Critical for ER Remodeling during Nutrient Stress.

Authors:  Heeseon An; Alban Ordureau; Joao A Paulo; Christopher J Shoemaker; Vladimir Denic; J Wade Harper
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Lung developmental arrest caused by PDGF-A deletion: consequences for the adult mouse lung.

Authors:  Leonor Gouveia; Simone Kraut; Stefan Hadzic; Elisa Vazquéz-Liébanas; Baktybek Kojonazarov; Cheng-Yu Wu; Christine Veith; Liqun He; Georgios Mermelekas; Ralph Theo Schermuly; Norbert Weissmann; Christer Betsholtz; Johanna Andrae
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 5.464

5.  Multiplexed proteome profiling of carbon source perturbations in two yeast species with SL-SP3-TMT.

Authors:  Joao A Paulo; Jose Navarrete-Perea; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Marine Proteobacteria metabolize glycolate via the β-hydroxyaspartate cycle.

Authors:  Lennart Schada von Borzyskowski; Francesca Severi; Karen Krüger; Lucas Hermann; Alexandre Gilardet; Felix Sippel; Bianca Pommerenke; Peter Claus; Niña Socorro Cortina; Timo Glatter; Stefan Zauner; Jan Zarzycki; Bernhard M Fuchs; Erhard Bremer; Uwe G Maier; Rudolf I Amann; Tobias J Erb
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Biological plasticity rescues target activity in CRISPR knock outs.

Authors:  Arne H Smits; Frederik Ziebell; Gerard Joberty; Nico Zinn; William F Mueller; Sandra Clauder-Münster; Dirk Eberhard; Maria Fälth Savitski; Paola Grandi; Petra Jakob; Anne-Marie Michon; Hanice Sun; Karen Tessmer; Tilmann Bürckstümmer; Marcus Bantscheff; Lars M Steinmetz; Gerard Drewes; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Growth media selection alters the proteome profiles of three model microorganisms.

Authors:  Jose Navarrete-Perea; Steven P Gygi; Joao A Paulo
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Online Nanoflow Two-Dimension Comprehensive Active Modulation Reversed Phase-Reversed Phase Liquid Chromatography High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for Metaproteomics of Environmental and Microbiome Samples.

Authors:  Matthew R McIlvin; Mak A Saito
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Mechanism of membrane-tethered mitochondrial protein synthesis.

Authors:  Yuzuru Itoh; Juni Andréll; Austin Choi; Uwe Richter; Priyanka Maiti; Robert B Best; Antoni Barrientos; Brendan J Battersby; Alexey Amunts
Journal:  Science       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.