Literature DB >> 30795648

SP2: Rapid and Automatable Contaminant Removal from Peptide Samples for Proteomic Analyses.

Matthew Waas1, Michael Pereckas2, Rachel A Jones Lipinski1, Christopher Ashwood1, Rebekah L Gundry1,2.   

Abstract

Peptide cleanup is essential for the removal of contaminating substances that may be introduced during sample preparation steps in bottom-up proteomic workflows. Recent studies have described benefits of carboxylate-modified paramagnetic particles over traditional reversed-phase methods for detergent and polymer removal, but challenges with reproducibility have limited the widespread implementation of this approach among laboratories. To overcome these challenges, the current study systematically evaluated key experimental parameters regarding the use of carboxylate-modified paramagnetic particles and determined those that are critical for maximum performance and peptide recovery and those for which the protocol is tolerant to deviation. These results supported the development of a detailed, easy-to-use standard operating protocol, termed SP2, which can be applied to remove detergents and polymers from peptide samples while concentrating the sample in solvent that is directly compatible with typical LC-MS workflows. We demonstrate that SP2 can be applied to phosphopeptides and glycopeptides and that the approach is compatible with robotic liquid handling for automated sample processing. Altogether, the results of this study and accompanying detailed operating protocols for both manual and automated processing are expected to facilitate reproducible implementation of SP2 for various proteomics applications and will especially benefit core or shared resource facilities where unknown or unexpected contaminants may be particularly problematic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LC−MS/MS; TMT; bottom-up proteomics; contaminant removal; glycopeptides; peptide cleanup; phosphopeptides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30795648      PMCID: PMC6571012          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  15 in total

1.  Efficient and specific trypsin digestion of microgram to nanogram quantities of proteins in organic-aqueous solvent systems.

Authors:  Michael Brad Strader; David L Tabb; W Judson Hervey; Chongle Pan; Gregory B Hurst
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Electrostatic repulsion hydrophilic interaction chromatography for isocratic separation of charged solutes and selective isolation of phosphopeptides.

Authors:  Andrew J Alpert
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Protter: interactive protein feature visualization and integration with experimental proteomic data.

Authors:  Ulrich Omasits; Christian H Ahrens; Sebastian Müller; Bernd Wollscheid
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Proteomic insights into mannan degradation and protein secretion by the forest floor bacterium Chitinophaga pinensis.

Authors:  Johan Larsbrink; Tina R Tuveng; Phillip B Pope; Vincent Bulone; Vincent G H Eijsink; Harry Brumer; Lauren S McKee
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  Minimal, encapsulated proteomic-sample processing applied to copy-number estimation in eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  Nils A Kulak; Garwin Pichler; Igor Paron; Nagarjuna Nagaraj; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Sodium dodecyl sulphate removal from tryptic digest samples for on-line capillary liquid chromatography/electrospray mass spectrometry.

Authors:  J P Vissers; J P Chervet; J P Salzmann
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.982

7.  Evaluation of FASP, SP3, and iST Protocols for Proteomic Sample Preparation in the Low Microgram Range.

Authors:  Malte Sielaff; Jörg Kuharev; Toszka Bohn; Jennifer Hahlbrock; Tobias Bopp; Stefan Tenzer; Ute Distler
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Extending the Compatibility of the SP3 Paramagnetic Bead Processing Approach for Proteomics.

Authors:  Sophie Moggridge; Poul H Sorensen; Gregg B Morin; Christopher S Hughes
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  Rapid Assessment of Contaminants and Interferences in Mass Spectrometry Data Using Skyline.

Authors:  Matthew J Rardin
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.109

10.  Combine and conquer: surfactants, solvents, and chaotropes for robust mass spectrometry based analyses of membrane proteins.

Authors:  Matthew Waas; Subarna Bhattacharya; Sandra Chuppa; Xiaogang Wu; Davin R Jensen; Ulrich Omasits; Bernd Wollscheid; Brian F Volkman; Kathleen R Noon; Rebekah L Gundry
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 6.986

View more
  12 in total

1.  SurfaceGenie: a web-based application for prioritizing cell-type-specific marker candidates.

Authors:  Matthew Waas; Shana T Snarrenberg; Jack Littrell; Rachel A Jones Lipinski; Polly A Hansen; John A Corbett; Rebekah L Gundry
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Direct Target Site Identification of a Sulfonyl-Triazole Covalent Kinase Probe by LC-MS Chemical Proteomics.

Authors:  Rebecca L McCloud; Kun Yuan; Keira E Mahoney; Dina L Bai; Jeffrey Shabanowitz; Mark M Ross; Donald F Hunt; Ku-Lung Hsu
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 8.008

3.  Research on the Human Proteome Reaches a Major Milestone: >90% of Predicted Human Proteins Now Credibly Detected, According to the HUPO Human Proteome Project.

Authors:  Gilbert S Omenn; Lydie Lane; Christopher M Overall; Ileana M Cristea; Fernando J Corrales; Cecilia Lindskog; Young-Ki Paik; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Siqi Liu; Stephen R Pennington; Michael P Snyder; Mark S Baker; Nuno Bandeira; Ruedi Aebersold; Robert L Moritz; Eric W Deutsch
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  The Roseoloviruses Downregulate the Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase PTPRC (CD45).

Authors:  Melissa L Whyte; Kelsey A Smith; Amanda Buchberger; Linda Berg Luecke; Lidya Handayani Tjan; Yasuko Mori; Rebekah L Gundry; Amy W Hudson
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  A Semiautomated Paramagnetic Bead-Based Platform for Isobaric Tag Sample Preparation.

Authors:  Xinyue Liu; Steven P Gygi; Joao A Paulo
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.262

6.  Fe3+-NTA magnetic beads as an alternative to spin column-based phosphopeptide enrichment.

Authors:  Xinyue Liu; Valentina Rossio; Sanjukta Guha Thakurta; Amarjeet Flora; Leigh Foster; Ryan D Bomgarden; Steven P Gygi; Joao A Paulo
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.855

7.  Automated sample preparation with SP3 for low-input clinical proteomics.

Authors:  Torsten Müller; Mathias Kalxdorf; Rémi Longuespée; Daniel N Kazdal; Albrecht Stenzinger; Jeroen Krijgsveld
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 11.429

8.  Facile Preparation of Peptides for Mass Spectrometry Analysis in Bottom-Up Proteomics Workflows.

Authors:  Melinda Wojtkiewicz; Linda Berg Luecke; Maia I Kelly; Rebekah L Gundry
Journal:  Curr Protoc       Date:  2021-03

9.  Discovery and validation of surface N-glycoproteins in MM cell lines and patient samples uncovers immunotherapy targets.

Authors:  Robyn A A Oldham; Mary L Faber; Theodore R Keppel; Amanda R Buchberger; Matthew Waas; Parameswaran Hari; Rebekah L Gundry; Jeffrey A Medin
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 13.751

Review 10.  A Pragmatic Guide to Enrichment Strategies for Mass Spectrometry-Based Glycoproteomics.

Authors:  Nicholas M Riley; Carolyn R Bertozzi; Sharon J Pitteri
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 5.911

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.