Literature DB >> 29564720

Evaluation of the effect of the accordion suturing technique on wound lengths in breast cancer surgery: a randomised clinical trial.

Michael Ita1,2, Kevin Koh3, Abeeda Butt3, Shaheed KaimKhani3, Louise Kelly3, Martin J O'Sullivan3, Henry Paul Redmond3,4, Mark A Corrigan3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cosmetic outcomes and scar lengths remain important considerations in breast cancer surgery. Suturing techniques should decrease scar tissue formation and provide good cosmetic results. The use of an accordion suturing technique may result in decreased surgical wound lengths and better cosmetic outcomes. We compared the outcomes of the accordion suturing technique with the standard suturing technique in breast cancer surgeries.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Female patients undergoing wide local excision of breast cancers were randomised to undergo closure of their surgical wound by either the accordion or the non-accordion (standard) suturing techniques between the months of May and October 2015. Pre-closure and post-closure wound lengths were measured intra-operatively. The primary outcome was a reduction of the surgical wound length at 6 weeks. The secondary outcome was a composite of the absence of hypertrophic scar tissue formation and optimal cosmesis.
RESULTS: Thirty eligible women for wide local excision of breast tumours were randomly assigned to the accordion and non-accordion groups (15 accordion and 15 non-accordion). Seven women were excluded from the study because they underwent re-excision of margins for their breast tumours before the end of 6 weeks, and one woman was lost to follow-up. We therefore compared the outcomes of 12 women who underwent closure of their surgical wound by way of the accordion suturing technique to the outcomes of 10 women who underwent closure with the non-accordion (standard) suturing technique. The percentage reduction of wound length at 6 weeks was significantly greater in the accordion group than in the non-accordion group (M = 24.4, SD = 10.2 vs. M = 8.6, SD = 11.5, p = 0.0026). There was no significant difference in the cosmetic outcome between both groups using the James Quinn's wound evaluation score.
CONCLUSION: The accordion suturing technique was associated with a significant reduction in surgical wound lengths in breast conserving surgery at 6 weeks without compromising the cosmetic result.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accordion suturing technique; Cosmesis; Wound length

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29564720     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-018-1772-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  7 in total

Review 1.  Laceration management.

Authors:  J E Hollander; A J Singer
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  An assessment of clinical wound evaluation scales.

Authors:  J V Quinn; G A Wells
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Patient self-evaluation of cosmetic outcome of breast-preserving cancer treatment.

Authors:  M P Patterson; R D Pezner; L R Hill; N L Vora; K R Desai; J A Lipsett
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.

Authors:  Annekatrien L van de Kar; Leonard U M Corion; Mark J C Smeulders; Lieneke J Draaijers; Chantal M A M van der Horst; Paul P M van Zuijlen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation.

Authors:  Lieneke J Draaijers; Fenike R H Tempelman; Yvonne A M Botman; Wim E Tuinebreijer; Esther Middelkoop; Robert W Kreis; Paul P M van Zuijlen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Rasch analysis of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) in burn scars.

Authors:  Martijn B A van der Wal; Wim E Tuinebreijer; Monica C T Bloemen; Pauline D H M Verhaegen; Esther Middelkoop; Paul P M van Zuijlen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.147

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Prevalence, Clinical Significance and Risk Factors for Developing Scar Pain and Sensibility Disorders in Breast Cancer Patients after Breast-Conserving Therapy and Mastectomy.

Authors:  Max Dieterich; Sophie Allmendinger; Bernd Gerber; Toralf Reimer; Steffi Hartmann; Angrit Stachs; Johannes Stubert
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 2.860

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.