Literature DB >> 16079683

Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.

Annekatrien L van de Kar1, Leonard U M Corion, Mark J C Smeulders, Lieneke J Draaijers, Chantal M A M van der Horst, Paul P M van Zuijlen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although scar evaluation tools are necessary for an evidence-based approach to scar management, there is as yet no generally accepted tool. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale was developed recently and found to be a useful subjective evaluation tool for burn scars. The authors tested the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale on linear scars, the largest category of surgical scars.
METHODS: One hundred linear surgical scars were assessed by three independent observers using the observer scale to evaluate vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, and surface area. The patients evaluated their scars simultaneously and 2 weeks later using the patient scale for the following parameters: pain, itching, color, stiffness, thickness, and relief.
RESULTS: The internal consistency of the observer and patient scales was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86 and 0.90, respectively). The reliability of the observer scale was good for the total score (r = 0.96, p < 0.001) and separate items (r > 0.86, p < 0.001) for three observers. Even a single observer evaluated scars reliably with respect to the total score (r = 0.88, p < 0.001) and the items vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, and surface area (r > 0.70, p < 0.001). The patient's intraobserver reliability was good for the total score (r = 0.94, p < 0.001) and separate items (r > 0.89, p < 0.001). The coefficient of variation of the total score was 10.4 percent for the observer scale and 15.8 percent for the patient scale, indicating good agreement.
CONCLUSIONS: The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale is an appropriate subjective tool for the evaluation of linear scars.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16079683     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000172982.43599.d6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  90 in total

1.  Adjuvance in refractory keloids using electron beams with a spoiler: Recent results.

Authors:  Antoni Vila Capel; Jorge Vilar Palop; Agustí Pedro Olivé; Alberto Sánchez-Reyes Fernández
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-08-28

2.  Towards quantifying the aesthetic outcomes of breast cancer treatment: comparison of clinical photography and colorimetry.

Authors:  Min Soon Kim; William N Rodney; Tara Cooper; Chris Kite; Gregory P Reece; Mia K Markey
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 3.  Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Surgical and Traumatic Scars: A Systematic Review of their Development, Content, and Psychometric Validation.

Authors:  Lily R Mundy; H Catherine Miller; Anne F Klassen; Stefan J Cano; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  Clinical Outcomes Following the Early Application of Multimodal Scar Programs for Facial Incisional Wounds.

Authors:  Joong Min Suh; Seong Hoon Park; Jun Won Lee; Seong Joo Lee; In Suck Suh; Jong Wook Lee; Hii Sun Jeong
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 5.  Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in colorectal surgery. Effects on surgical site events: current status and call to action.

Authors:  Gianluca Pellino; Guido Sciaudone; Francesco Selvaggi; Silvestro Canonico
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-04-29

6.  Differential item functioning in the Observer Scale of the POSAS for different scar types.

Authors:  Martijn B A van der Wal; Wim E Tuinebreijer; Åsa Lundgren-Nilsson; Esther Middelkoop; Paul P M van Zuijlen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Cx43-Mimetic Peptide in Cutaneous Scarring.

Authors:  Christina L Grek; Jade Montgomery; Meenakshi Sharma; A Ravi; J S Rajkumar; Kurtis E Moyer; Robert G Gourdie; Gautam S Ghatnekar
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 8.551

8.  Combination therapy using non-ablative fractional laser and intralesional triamcinolone injection for hypertrophic scars and keloids treatment.

Authors:  Jongweon Shin; Jin Tae Cho; Song I Park; Sung No Jung
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Prospective randomized comparison of the safety, efficacy, and cosmetic outcome associated with mini-transverse and mini-longitudinal radical prostatectomy incisions.

Authors:  Bruce R Kava; Rajinikanth Ayyathurai; Cynthia T Soloway; Miguel Suarez; Prashanth Kanagarajah; Manoharan Murugesan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-07

10.  Successful eradication of helical rim keloids with surgical excision followed by pressure therapy using a combination of magnets and silicone gel sheeting.

Authors:  Tae Hwan Park; Dong Kyun Rah
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.