Literature DB >> 4044347

Patient self-evaluation of cosmetic outcome of breast-preserving cancer treatment.

M P Patterson, R D Pezner, L R Hill, N L Vora, K R Desai, J A Lipsett.   

Abstract

Thirty-two patients with Stage I or II breast cancer who had completed conservative breast-preserving treatment were asked to rate their cosmetic outcomes. Within this group, extent of the surgical excision of the breast tumor varied, with biopsy scars ranging from 2 to 19.5 cm. All patients had received external beam radiotherapy, with local boost doses in 17 cases. The average interval between self-evaluation and the completion of radiotherapy was 19 months. Patients completed a questionnaire rating the appearance of the treated breast, the degree of difference between breasts and overall satisfaction with cosmesis. They were asked to describe differences between breasts and to make any additional comments. Appearance of the treated breast was rated good to excellent by 94%, although 88% noted a difference of slight to moderate degree between treated and untreated breasts. Overall, 78% of patients were very to extremely satisfied, while moderate satisfaction was reported by 19%. Reports of breast differences included reduced size of the treated breast (44%), increased firmness (31%), elevation (25%), and skin color changes (22%). Reasons for dissatisfaction included chronic breast pain in 3 patients, breast edema in one and arm edema in one. Two patients wanted the untreated breast reduced in size. Statistically significant inverse relationships were found between the length of the biopsy scar and patient ratings of both appearance of the treated breast and overall satisfaction. These results indicated that although most patients were satisfied with cosmetic results of breast-preserving treatments, they are quite discriminating in their evaluations of differences between breasts. Functional factors such as pain and edema had a negative impact on satisfaction with cosmesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4044347     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90044-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  9 in total

1.  The patient's appraisal of the cosmetic result of segmental mastectomy in benign and malignant breast disease.

Authors:  L Holmberg; E Zarén; H O Adami; R Bergström; T Burns
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction in Breast Conservation Surgery: Improving the Oncological and Aesthetic Outcomes.

Authors:  Santosh N Mathapati; Ashish Goel; Sandeep Mehta; Juhi Aggarwal; R Aravindan; Vikash Nayak; Sangram K Panda; Pankaj K Pande; Kapil Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-03-14

3.  Cosmetic outcome of breast conservative treatment for early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  M Arenas; S Sabater; V Hernández; I Henríquez; A Ameijide; Ll Anglada; E Mur; M Artigues; A Lafuerza; J Borras
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Evaluation of the effect of the accordion suturing technique on wound lengths in breast cancer surgery: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Michael Ita; Kevin Koh; Abeeda Butt; Shaheed KaimKhani; Louise Kelly; Martin J O'Sullivan; Henry Paul Redmond; Mark A Corrigan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  A prospective study of breast lymphedema: frequency, symptoms, and quality of life.

Authors:  Amy C Degnim; Joyce Miller; Tanya L Hoskin; Judy C Boughey; Margie Loprinzi; Kristine Thomsen; Shaun Maloney; Larry M Baddour; Andrea L Cheville
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Methods of Esthetic Assessment after Adjuvant Whole-Breast Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients: Evaluation of the BCCT.core Software and Patients' and Physicians' Assessment from the Randomized IMRT-MC2 Trial.

Authors:  Tobias Forster; Clara Köhler; Melissa Dorn; Matthias Felix Häfner; Nathalie Arians; Laila König; Semi Ben Harrabi; Ingmar Schlampp; Eva Meixner; Vanessa Heinrich; Nicola Weidner; Michael Golatta; André Hennigs; Jörg Heil; Holger Hof; David Krug; Jürgen Debus; Juliane Hörner-Rieber
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Dermoglandular rotation flaps for breast-conserving therapy: aesthetic results, patient satisfaction, and morbidity in comparison to standard segmentectomy.

Authors:  Ursula Hille-Betz; Bernhard Vaske; Helga Henseler; Philipp Soergel; Sudip Kundu; Lars Makowski; Sophia Schelcher; Sebastian Wojcinski; Peter Hillemanns
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2014-11-04

8.  Oncoplastic Surgery for Upper/Upper Inner Quadrant Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph Lin; Dar-Ren Chen; Yu-Fen Wang; Hung-Wen Lai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  On the use of virtual simulation in radiotherapy of the intact breast.

Authors:  W A Tomé; R A Steeves; B P Paliwal
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.