Literature DB >> 29564238

Antimicrobial activity of four essential oils against pigmenting Pseudomonas fluorescens and biofilmproducing Staphylococcus aureus of dairy origin.

Francesca Pedonese1, Filippo Fratini1, Luisa Pistelli2, Federica Maria Porta1, Pierluigi Di Ciccio3, Roberto Fischetti4, Barbara Turchi1, Roberta Nuvoloni1.   

Abstract

Essential oils (EOs) are mixtures of secondary metabolites of plant origin with many useful properties, among which the antimicrobial activity is also of interest for the food industry. EOs can exert their antimicrobial potential both directly, in food products and active packaging, and indirectly, as sanitizing and anti-biofilm agents of food facility surfaces. Aim of this research was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of four EOs (bergamot, cinnamon, manuka and thyme) against Pseudomonas fluorescens and Staphylococcus aureus isolated from milk and dairy products. The chemical composition of EOs was evaluated by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry analysis. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration values were determined by a microplate method against 9 Ps. fluorescens from marketed mozzarella with blue discoloration defect, and 3 biofilm-producing S. aureus from milk. Reference ATCC strains were included. Pigment production activity by Ps. fluorescens was assessed both in culture and in cheese. EOs of manuka (leptospermone 23%) and thyme (carvacrol 30%, pcymene 20%, thymol 15%) showed the highest antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, MIC values were 0.012%-0.024% and 0.024% v/v, respectively; meanwhile EOs from thyme and cinnamon (cinnamaldehyde 55%) exhibited the best activity against Ps. fluorescens with MIC values of 0.098%-0.195% and 0.195%-0.391% v/v, respectively. The antimicrobial activity of these EOs is promising and they could be exploited in the dairy production chain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dairy; Essential oils; Gas chromatography- mass spectrometry; Pseudomonas fluorescens; Staphylococcus aureus

Year:  2017        PMID: 29564238      PMCID: PMC5850063          DOI: 10.4081/ijfs.2017.6939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ital J Food Saf        ISSN: 2239-7132


Introduction

Essential oils (EOs) are aromatic and volatile mixtures of secondary metabolites obtained from different parts of plants. EOs are composed of many bioactive molecules, mainly terpenes, terpenoids and phenylpropenes, and their actual antimicrobial effect depends on many intrinsic and environmental factors (Hyldgaard et al., 2012). Their use in food industry is aimed to provide flavours and to improve safety and quality of products. They can be employed directly in food, or as components of food packaging (Lucera et al., 2012) and even in sanification of food processing environments and food-contact surfaces due to their antimicrobial and anti-biofilm potential (Valeriano et al., 2012). The present work was aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial activities of four EOs (Citrus bergamia Risso, Cinnamomum zeylanicum L., Leptospermum scoparium J.R. et G. Forst and Thymus vulgaris L.) on food-related bacteria: Pseudomonas fluorescens, isolated from mozzarella cheese with blue discoloration, and biofilm-producing Staphylococcus aureus from milk. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analyses were carried out to perform the chemical characterization of the four tested EOs.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial cultures

A total of 10 Ps. fluorescens was used in this study: 9 wild isolates (PS59, PS60, PS63, PS70, PS71, PS231, PS249, PS251 and PS282) from commercial samples of spoiled mozzarella cheeses with blue pigmentation and the reference strain Ps. fluorescens ATCC 13525. The wild isolates, provided by Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Lazio-Toscana (Pisa), were phenotypically identified by API 20 NE (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France). Moreover, the identification was confirmed genetically according to Scarpellini et al. (2004). After DNA extraction by boiling at 95°C for 10 min, the species-specific PCR was performed using the KAPA Taq ReadyMix PCR kit (Kapa Biosystems, Boston, MA, USA). The pigmentation capacity of pseudomonads was studied in mozzarella cheese and in a lab-made minimal nutritive broth used for the cultivation and maintenance of Pseudomonas fluorescens and other microorganisms (Yeast Extract Glucose Broth, YEGB, https://www.bioworld. com/productinfo/3_43_287_688/101 74/Yeast-Extract-Glucose-Broth.html). YEGB had the following composition: glucose 1.5 g/L, di-potassium hydrogen orthophosphate 5.2 g/L, potassium dihydrogen phosphate 3.18 g/L, magnesium sulfate 0.12 g/L, yeast extract 0.5 g/L, ammonium chloride 0.54 g/L. Marketed citric mozzarella samples were inoculated with a final count of about 102 CFU/mL in preservation liquid. Samples were stored at 10°C for 72 hours in their packaging and then opened, maintained at the same temperature and observed daily up to 10 days. Pseudomonas quantitative determination on Pseudomonas Agar with CFC Supplement (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) was carried out to exclude the presence of pseudomonads in the preservation liquid. As for YEGB assay, each isolate wasgrown overnight at 25°C in YEGB, and ten-fold serial dilutions in sterile saline solution were prepared. Ten μL of the dilutions were seeded, in 5 different Eppendorf tubes per isolate, to obtain final counts of pseudomonads ranging from 101 to105 CFU/mL. Each tube, of 1.5 mL declared capacity, was filled to the top with 1.8 mL of YEGB to maximize the surface of broth culture exposed to air. Eppendorf tubes were left open, incubated at 25°C and observed daily up to 7 days. Among biofilm-producing S. aureus, 3 strains, isolated from raw milk, came from the collection of Food and Drug Department, Parma (PA1 and PA2) and from that of Veterinary Science Department, Pisa (PI1) and their biofilmproducing capacity had been previously assessed following Di Ciccio et al. (2015), the other 2 were reference strains, S. aureus ATCC 35556 (strong producer) and S. aureus ATCC 12600 (intermediate producer). S. aureus PA1 and S. aureus PA2 had been previously characterized as methicillin- resistant (MRSA) (Di Ciccio et al., 2016); S. aureus PI1 was a methicillin-susceptible, enterotoxin C producer (Pedonese et al., 2014).

Essential oils

EOs (from Flora s.r.l., Lorenzana, Pisa, Italy) of bergamot (C. bergamia Risso, Cb), cinnamon bark (C. zeylanicum L., in 40% ethanol, Cz), manuka leaves (L. scoparium J. R. et G. Forst, Ls) and thymus (T. vulgaris L., Tv) were used.

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry Analysis

The chemical composition of EOs was determined by using Gas Chromatography- Electron Impact Mass Spectrometry (GCMS). Analyses were performed with a Varian CP-3800 gas chromatograph equipped with a DB-5 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm; coating thickness 0.25 μm) and a Varian Saturn 2000 ion trap mass detector. Analytical conditions were those reported by Fratini et al. (2014). The identification of the constituents was based on comparison of retention times with those of pure authentic samples, comparing their retention indices relative (LRI) to the series of n-hydrocarbons, by computer matching against commercial libraries (NIST 98 and ADAMS) (Adams, 1995) and homemade library mass spectra, built up from pure substances, known oils and MS literature data (Stenhagen et al., 1974).

Minimal inhibitory concentration determination assay

MIC values of EOs, i.e. the lowest concentration that inhibits the visible microbial growth, were determined following Wiegand et al. (2008) with minor modifications. The assay was performed in sterile 96-well microtiter plates using 10 μL of bacterial inoculum and 190 μL of each EOs dilution. EOs dilutions were prepared in Tryptone Soy Broth (Oxoid) supplemented with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to a final ratio of 1:3:4 (v/v) and a two-fold dilution series was performed from 1/8 to 1/16384. For the bacterial inoculum an overnight broth culture of each microorganism, spectrophotometrically (Ultrospec 2100 Pro, Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, GB) adjusted at 550 nm at about 1.5 x 108 CFU/mL, was used. Positive and negative controls, and for Cz also ethanol control, were included. The microplates were incubated at 25°C (pseudomonads) and 37°C (staphylococci) for 24 hours avoiding evaporation. The assay was made in triplicate and the mode was determined.

Results

Confirmation of identification and pigment production by Pseudomonas fluorescens

All isolates were phenotypically identified as Ps. fluorescens with an API identification percentage range of 99.7%-99.9% and a T index range of 0.87-0.97. Speciesspecific PCR results confirmed that all the isolates belonged to the species Ps. fluorescens. They were able to produce blue pigment in mozzarella cheese and in its preservation liquid, beginning from 2 days after the package opening, and more abundantly at the end of the trial. The pigmentation production was evident for all isolates except for PS63 and PS282. The lack of pigmentation was confirmed for these 2 isolates also in YEGB. All the other isolates showed a visible pigmentation at all dilutions with YEGB method beginning from 48 hours of incubation. The isolation of nopigment producing Ps. fluorescens from blue mozzarella cheeses indicates that cheese samples were contaminated with different strains.

Essential oils composition

GC-MS profile revealed the presence of 7, 13, 18 and 11 different compounds with a percentage higher than 1% for Cb, Cz, Ls and Tv, respectively (Table 1). The most representative compounds mainly included in monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes were linalool acetate (34.9%) and limonene (30.8%) for Cb, leptospermone (22.9%) and trans-calamenene (15.2%) for Ls and carvacrol (29.7%), p-cymene (20.2%) and thymol (15.3%) for Tv. Cz showed the non-terpene derivative (E)-cinnamaldehyde (55%) together with the sesquiterpene β- caryophyllene (10.2%), as main compounds.
Table 1.

Chemical composition of essential oils detected by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis.

CompoundcompositionLRICbCzLsTv
α-pineneClass9401.11.71.1
Sabinenemh9781.1
β-pinenemh9816
Myrcenemh993 1.3
α-phellandrenemh10061.1
α-terpinenemh10191.5
p-cymenemh102620.2
o-cymenemh10262.5
Limonenemh103230.8 
β-phellandrenemh10334.4
γ-terpinenemh10627.48.3
Linaloolmh110212.557.4
Camphorom11481
4-terpineolom11801.8
(Z)-cinnamaldehydeom12231.2
Linalool acetatent126034.9 
(E)-cinnamaldehydeom127455
Thymolnt129015.3
Carvacrolom130129.7
α-cubebeneom13513.2
Eugenolsh13614.6
α-copaenepp13761.64.8
α-gurjunenesh14101
β-caryophyllenesh141810.22.44.8
Aromadendrenesh14411.8
(E)-cinnamyl acetatesh14491.1
cis-muurola-3,5-dienent14505
α-humulenesh14562.8 
trans-cadina-1(6),4-dienesh14703.7
γ-muurolenesh14771.1
β-selinenesh14854.8
trans-muurola-4-(14),5-dienesh14941
Viridiflorenesh14955.3
trans-calamenenesh152215.2
δ-cadinenesh15234.5
α-calacorenesh15426.3
Caryophyllene oxidesh15821.4
iso-leptospermoneos16235.6
Leptospermoneos163122.9
Cubenolos16471.1
Benzylbenzoateos17661.8
Unknownnt0.33.200.1
Mh48.410.32.734.4
Om49.26.20.258.1
Sh1.814.664.96.5
Os01.631.70.4
Nt0.359.50.50.5
Pp04.600
Total (unknown excluded)99.796.8100.099.9

LRI, linear retenction index; Cb, Citrus bergamia; Cz, Cinnamomum zeylanicum; Ls, Leptospermum scoparium; Tv, Thymus vulgaris; mh, monoterpene hydrocarbons; om, oxygenated monoterpenes; sh, sesquiterpenes hydrocarbons; os, oxygenated sesquiterpenes; nt, no terpene derivatives; pp, phenilpropanoids. Other compounds were detected at <1%. They were: for Cb, α-thujene, myrcene, p-cymene, (E)-β- ocimene, terpinolene, α-terpineol, 1-octanyl acetate, neral, geranial, α-terpinyl acetate, neryl acetate, geranyl acetate, trans- α-bergamotene, (E)-β-farnesene, β-bisabolene, bergaptene; for Cz, α-thujene, α-pinene, camphene, benzaldehyde, β-pinene, α-terpinene, p-mentha-2,4(8)- diene, 4-terpineol, α-terpineol, (Z)-ocimenone, humulene epoxide-II, tetradecanal; for Ls, β-pinene, myrcene, p-cymene, limonene, 1,8-cineole, γ-terpinene, isopentylisovalerate, methylbutanoate, cyclosativene, β-elemene, β-copaene, α-neoclovene, alloaromadendrene, α-amorphene, α-muurolene, α-bulnesene, (E,E)-α-farnesene, δ-amorphene, trans-γ-cadinene, cadina-1,4-diene (cubenene), flavesone, (E)- nerolidol, spathulenol, caryophyllene oxide, globulol, viridiflorol, valerianol; for Tv, α-thujene, camphene, β-pinene, 1-octen-3-ol, 3-octanone, α-phellandrene, cis-sabinene hydrate, terpinolene, borneol, p-cymen-8-ol, α-terpineol, cis-dihydrocarvone, verbenone, methylcarvacrol, linalool acetate, isobornyl acetate, carvacrol acetate, α-humulene, (E)-β-farnesene, γ-muurolene, viridiflorene, trans-γ-cadinene, δ- cadinene, caryophyllene oxide. All these compounds were considered for calculating the total percentage of each class of constituents.

Determination of minimal inhibitory concentration against Pseudomonas fluorescens and Staphylococcus aureus

Overall, the tested biofilm-producing S. aureus showed to be more sensitive than Ps. fluorescens. Particularly, as shown in Table 2, very promising MIC values were obtained for Ls (0.012% v/v for 4 strains out of 5, among which the MRSA, and 0.024% v/v for the remaining one), which resulted even better than Tv (0.024% v/v). Cz evidenced an intermediate effect (0.049%-0.098% v/v), while Cb was poorly effective (≥ 0.781% v/v). Ps. fluorescens growth was not affected by Cb and Ls, which were active only at high concentrations. Also Tv and Cz showed higher MIC values than those obtained for S. aureus (0.098%-0.195% and 0.195%-0.391% v/v, respectively). Ethanol solvent had negligible effect on the antimicrobial activity of Cz EO (MIC: 3.125% v/v).
Table 2.

Minimal inhibitory concentration of four essential oils against the tested Pseudomonas fluorescens and Staphylococcus aureus.

EOs MIC (% v/v)
CbCzLsTv
Ps. fl. PS593.1250.1953.1250.195
Ps. fl. PS603.1250.1953.1250.195
Ps. fl. PS633.1250.3913.1250.195
Ps. fl. PS703.1250.3913.1250.098
Ps. fl. PS713.1250.3913.1250.195
Ps. fl. PS2313.1250.3913.1250.195
Ps. fl. PS2493.1250.3913.1250.098
Ps. fl. PS2513.1250.3913.1250.098
Ps. fl. PS2823.1250.3913.1250.195
Ps. fl. ATCC 135253.1250.3913.1250.098
S.a. PA10.7810.0490.0120.024
S a. PA21.5630.0490.0120.024
S.a. PI11.5630.0490.0120.024
S.a. ATCC 355561.5630.0980.0240.024
S.a. ATCC 126001.5630.0490.0120.024

Eos, essential oils; Cb, Citrus bergamia; Cz, Cinnamomum zeylanicum; Ls, Leptospermum scoparium; Tv, Thymus vulgaris; S.a., Staphylococcus aureus; Ps.fl., Pseudomonas fluorescens. Results are the mode of three independent trials.

Discussion

The tested microorganisms, belonging to a pathogenic, S. aureus, and a spoilage species, Ps. fluorescens, have been chosen for their relevance for dairy industry. S. aureus is one of the most frequent pathogens associated with milk and dairy outbreaks (De Buyser et al., 2001). In recent years biofilm-producing and methicillin- resistant S. aureus, such as the wild ones tested in this study, have been recovered from food of animal origin, in which milk and dairy products (Parisi et al., 2016; Basanisi et al., 2017). Thus, the role of food-producing animals and food products as vectors of S. aureus, MRSA included, in the food chain is of great concern. Pseudomonads are involved in the spoilage of many chilled food of animal origin; in milk and dairy products they are responsible for off-odours, off-flavours, decreased cheese yields, discolorations (Arslan et al., 2011). The species Ps. fluorescens is the main causative agent of blue discoloration of fresh cheeses (Martin et al., 2011) and of mozzarella cheese, in particular (Cenci Goga et al., 2014). In this study, Ps. fluorescens isolated from blue mozzarella cheese were studied. Concerning the pigment production, the use of YEGB, which is also available on the market for bacterial cultivation and maintenance purposes, could be a cheap and simple tool for food industry to monitor the presence of pigmenting pseudomonads, either in the production environments or in products, even if the test requires previous isolation of microorganisms. Antimicrobial activity of EOs has been documented since the mid-twentieth century (Burt, 2004). Many studies have focused on the antimicrobial properties of different EOs against S. aureus, comprising MRSA. Particularly thyme and cinnamon and their major constituents often showed interesting results. However the tested bacterial strains were generally reference strains or clinical isolates (Smith-Palmer et al., 1998; Jia et al., 2011; Boskovic et al., 2015; Reyes- Jurado et al., 2016). Regarding our study, we evaluated the antimicrobial activity of four EOs (bergamot, cinnamon, manuka and thyme) against wild food strains, isolated from milk and dairy products, of Ps. fluorescens and biofilm-producing S. aureus, MRSA included, in addition to reference strains. As to manuka, the antimicrobial properties of its honey have been studied more than that of its EO (Mandal and Mandal, 2011). Generally, in our study we observed that the EO resulted to be much more active on Gram positive bacteria than on Gram negative, as reported also by Maddock-Jennings et al. (2005); in addition, van Klink et al. (2005), documented in particular the remarkable antimicrobial effect of EO major compounds, β- trichetones, on MRSA. Moreover, we recently found in another study (Fratini et al., 2017) very interesting MIC results for manuka EO, comparable to those obtained with our biofilm-forming S. aureus, on different S. aureus strains from milk (methicillin- susceptible and not biofilm-producing strains). Data about bergamot EO are scanty: a study performed by Fisher and Phillips (2006) using different Gram positive and negative microorganisms as target bacteria showed that Cb EO was more effective against the Gram-positive bacteria. S. aureus was less affected, if compared with Listeria monocytogenes and Bacillus cereus. More recently, Marotta et al. (2016) evidenced a strain-dependent activity of bergamot EO on L. monocytogenes from food samples. In our research Cb EO was effective on S. aureus only at high concentrations. Overall, it is known that Gram-negative bacteria are more resistant to the EOs effect, due to the hydrophilic lipopolysaccharides contained in the outer membrane, which create a barrier against EOs hydrophobic antimicrobial compounds (Hyldgaard et al., 2012). Generally, Ps. fluorescens sensitivity to EOs has been poorly investigated. Outtara et al. (1997) reported that cinnamon EO was more active than thyme EO on Ps fluorescens isolated from beef, whereas we found a higher activity of Tv EO. Also, we found MIC values of about 1-2 μL/mL and 2-4 μL/mL, for Tv and Cz EOs respectively, against Ps. fluorescens ATCC 13525. Similarly, Mith et al. (2014) found that Ps. fluorescensATCC 13525 was more resistant than other Gram positive and Gram-negative reference strains to the different EOs tested and among which cinnamon and thyme, with MICs ranging from 1 to 1.5 μL/mL.

Conclusions

The need for natural alternatives to synthetic chemicals is increasing in food industry, as well as the consumers request for natural products. Our study provides interesting data about EOs sensitivity of food-related wild microorganisms, which may be useful in implementing new solutions for sanification of food facilities surfaces and/or for direct use in food and packaging, particularly in the dairy production chain.
  21 in total

Review 1.  Honey: its medicinal property and antibacterial activity.

Authors:  Manisha Deb Mandal; Shyamapada Mandal
Journal:  Asian Pac J Trop Biomed       Date:  2011-04

2.  Triketones active against antibiotic-resistant bacteria: synthesis, structure-activity relationships, and mode of action.

Authors:  John W van Klink; Lesley Larsen; Nigel B Perry; Rex T Weavers; Gregory M Cook; Phil J Bremer; Andrew D MacKenzie; Teruo Kirikae
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Spoilage potentials and antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas spp. isolated from cheeses.

Authors:  S Arslan; A Eyi; F Özdemir
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  When cheese gets the blues: Pseudomonas fluorescens as the causative agent of cheese spoilage.

Authors:  N H Martin; S C Murphy; R D Ralyea; M Wiedmann; K J Boor
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 5.  Implication of milk and milk products in food-borne diseases in France and in different industrialised countries.

Authors:  M L De Buyser; B Dufour; M Maire; V Lafarge
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2001-07-20       Impact factor: 5.277

6.  Development of PCR assay to identify Pseudomonas fluorescens and its biotype.

Authors:  Mauro Scarpellini; Laura Franzetti; Antoniëtta Galli
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances.

Authors:  Irith Wiegand; Kai Hilpert; Robert E W Hancock
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.491

8.  Antibacterial activity of essential oils, their blends and mixtures of their main constituents against some strains supporting livestock mastitis.

Authors:  Filippo Fratini; Sergio Casella; Michele Leonardi; Francesca Pisseri; Valentina Virginia Ebani; Laura Pistelli; Luisa Pistelli
Journal:  Fitoterapia       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.882

9.  Antimicrobial activities of commercial essential oils and their components against food-borne pathogens and food spoilage bacteria.

Authors:  Hasika Mith; Rémi Duré; Véronique Delcenserie; Abdesselam Zhiri; Georges Daube; Antoine Clinquart
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 2.863

10.  Food applications of natural antimicrobial compounds.

Authors:  Annalisa Lucera; Cristina Costa; Amalia Conte; Matteo A Del Nobile
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  Protective Impact of Chitosan Film Loaded Oregano and Thyme Essential Oil on the Microbial Profile and Quality Attributes of Beef Meat.

Authors:  Abdul Basit M Gaba; Mohamed A Hassan; Ashraf A Abd El-Tawab; Mohamed A Abdelmonem; Mohamed K Morsy
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 2.  Antibiotic Resistant Pseudomonas Spp. Spoilers in Fresh Dairy Products: An Underestimated Risk and the Control Strategies.

Authors:  Laura Quintieri; Francesca Fanelli; Leonardo Caputo
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2019-09-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.