| Literature DB >> 29561814 |
Gehendra Mahara1,2,3, Kun Yang4,5,6, Sipeng Chen7,8,9, Wei Wang10,11,12, Xiuhua Guo13,14.
Abstract
Evidence shows that multiple factors, such as socio-economic status and access to health care facilities, affect tuberculosis (TB) incidence. However, there is limited literature available with respect to the correlation between socio-economic/health facility factors and tuberculosis incidence. This study aimed to explore the relationship between TB incidence and socio-economic/health service predictors in the study settings. A retrospective spatial regression analysis was carried out based on new sputum smear-positive pulmonary TB cases in Beijing districts. Global Moran's I analysis was adopted to detect the spatial dependency followed by spatial regression models (spatial lag model, and spatial error model) along with the ordinary least square model were applied to examine the correlation between TB incidence and predictors. A high incidence of TB was seen in densely populated districts in Beijing, e.g., Haidian, Mentougou, and Xicheng. After comparing the R², log-likelihood, and Akaike information criterion (AIC) values among three models, the spatial error model (R² = 0.413; Log Likelihood = -591; AIC = 1199.76) identified the best model fit for the spatial regression model. The study showed that the number of beds in health institutes (p < 0.001) and per capita gross domestic product (GDP) (p = 0.025) had a positive effect on TB incidence, whereas population density (p < 0.001) and migrated population (p < 0.001) had an adverse impact on TB incidence in the study settings. High TB incidence districts were detected in urban and densely populated districts in Beijing. Our findings suggested that socio-economic predictors influence TB incidence. These findings may help to guide TB control programs and promote targeted intervention.Entities:
Keywords: Beijing; China; socio-economic factors; spatial statistics; tuberculosis
Year: 2018 PMID: 29561814 PMCID: PMC6024827 DOI: 10.3390/medsci6020026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3271
Figure 1Trends of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) incidence in Beijing districts, from 2005–2014 as respective (A–J) in the figure.
Description of outcome and predictor variables.
| Variables | Min | Max | Mean | Std. Deviation | Moran’s | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tuberculosis cases (TBC) | 39 | 885 | 256.37 | 183.340 | 0.193 | <0.001 |
| Tuberculosis rate (TBR) | 5.96 | 71.78 | 25.8218 | 12.97541 | −0.010 | 0.446 |
| Number of health institutes (NHI) | 68 | 1337 | 472.40 | 310.911 | 0.210 | <0.001 |
| Number of hospital beds (NHB) | 982 | 19,053 | 5763.34 | 4498.153 | 0.422 | <0.001 |
| Migrant Population (M_P) | 2.0 | 180 | 38.90 | 42.045 | 0.264 | <0.001 |
| Per capita GDP (PC_GDP) | 1.38 | 23.44 | 5.5224 | 4.49726 | 0.254 | <0.001 |
| Population density per 3 km (PD_3) | 0.13 | 25.55 | 4.9954 | 7.35956 | 0.439 | <0.001 |
| Permanent resident ropulation (PRP) | 27.7 | 392.2 | 117.259 | 94.4632 | 0.298 | <0.001 |
| County/district level GDP (C_GDP) | 0.40 | 43.37 | 7.8275 | 9.84348 | 0.305 | <0.001 |
County/district level gross domestic product (C_GDP) expressed in Billions of US dollars, per capita GDP (PC_GDP) = expressed in thousands of US dollars.
Figure 2Description of outcome and predictor variables during the study period.
Global spatial autocorrelation analysis of TB incidence in Beijing, 2005–2014.
| Years | Moran’s- | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0.199 | 1.920 | 0.033 |
| 2006 | 0.177 | 1.741 | 0.045 |
| 2007 | 0.118 | 1.627 | 0.059 |
| 2008 | −0.012 | 0.374 | 0.326 |
| 2009 | −0.009 | 0.419 | 0.319 |
| 2010 | 0.062 | 0.897 | 0.168 |
| 2011 | 0.123 | 1.326 | 0.104 |
| 2012 | 0.163 | 1.685 | 0.051 |
| 2013 | 0.100 | 1.354 | 0.107 |
| 2014 | 0.104 | 1.142 | 0.126 |
Results of the Ordinary least square (OLS) model, the Spatial lag Model (SLM) and the spatial error model (SEM) assessing the correlates of the TB rate with maximum likelihood estimation.
| Variable | Ordinary Least Squares Model | Spatial Lag Model | Spatial Error Model | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | St.Error | T-Value | Coefficient | St-Error | Z-Value | Coefficient | St-Error | Z-Value | ||||
| NHI | −0.00528 | 0.00583 | −0.9058 | 0.3664 | −0.005624 | 0.00551 | −1.0197 | 0.307 | 0.002067 | 0.0073 | 0.27953 | 0.779 |
| NHB | 0.00332 | 0.00065 | 5.11351 | 0.003137 | 0.00061 | 5.08384 | 0.004666 | 0.00060 | 7.7630 | |||
| C_GDP | 0.71719 | 0.28287 | 2.53537 | 0.858366 | 0.27062 | 3.17185 | −0.131481 | 0.32594 | −0.4033 | 0.686 | ||
| −0.90688 | 0.53734 | −1.6876 | 0.093 | −1.081062 | 0.51153 | −2.1133 | 1.349843 | 0.60574 | 2.22839 | |||
| PD_3 | −0.73422 | 0.32684 | −2.2463 | −0.69715 | 0.30916 | −2.2549 | −2.209779 | 0.33873 | −6.5236 | |||
| PRP | −0.08174 | 0.04392 | −1.8609 | 0.064 | −0.099438 | 0.04152 | −2.3944 | −0.017595 | 0.04182 | −0.4206 | 0.673 | |
| M_P | −0.26147 | 0.08852 | −2.9537 | −0.248568 | 0.08481 | −2.9307 | −0.371144 | 0.09248 | −4.0130 | |||
| Lambda (λ) | 10.57686 | 1.54012 | 6.8675 | |||||||||
| Rho (ρ) | −0.795591 | |||||||||||
| R2 | 0.359035 | 0.397502 | 0.413278 | |||||||||
| Log-likelihood | −601.035 | −594.763 | −591.880 | |||||||||
| AIC | 1218.07 | 1207.53 | 1199.76 | |||||||||
| BPT | 58.9438 | 59.9531 | 16.4445 | |||||||||
| LRT | 12.5443 | 18.3090 | ||||||||||
TBC = tuberculosis cases, TBR = tuberculosis rate, NHI = number of health institutes, NHB = number of beds in the hospital, M_P = migrant population, PC_GDP = per capita GDP, PD_3 = population density/3 km, PRP = permanent resident population, BPT = Breusch–Pagan test, AIC = Akaike information criterion, LRT = likelihood ratio test, Significant is at the p < 0.05 level.