| Literature DB >> 18760008 |
Zhong-Wei Jia1, Xiao-Wei Jia, Yun-Xi Liu, Christopher Dye, Feng Chen, Chang-Sheng Chen, Wen-Yi Zhang, Xiao-Wen Li, Wu-Chun Cao, He-Liang Liu.
Abstract
To determine the role of the migrant population in the transmission of tuberculosis (TB), we investigated the distribution and magnitude of TB in permanent residents and migrant populations of Beijing, People's Republic of China, from 2000 through 2006. An exploratory spatial data analysis was applied to detect the "hot spots" of TB among the 2 populations. Results, using the data obtained from 2004-2006, showed that people who migrated from the western, middle, and eastern zones of China had a significantly higher risk of having TB than did permanent residents. These findings indicate that population fluctuations have affected the rate of TB prevalence in Beijing, and interventions to control TB should include the migrant population.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18760008 PMCID: PMC2603090 DOI: 10.3201/eid1409.071543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Figure 1The 4 zones of China. These divisions were made on the basis of economic and geographic factors.
Figure 2Population density of permanent residents and migrant population in Beijing, 2000–2006. Because the population density of permanent residents showed little change from 2000 through 2006, we showed the mean density of permanent residents in panel A. Panels B through H denote the density of migrant population from 2000 through 2006, respectively.
Figure 3The prevalence rate of tuberculosis (TB) among the permanent residents and migrant population in Beijing, 2000–2006. The district graph unit consists of 7 bars, which denote the prevalence rate of TB from 2000 through 2006, respectively. A) Change in TB prevalence among permanent residents. B) Change in TB prevalence among migrant population.
Moran’s I analysis on TB cases in the migrant population and permanent resident population, Beijing, 2000–2006*
| Year | TB cases among Beijing permanent residents | TB cases among the migrant population | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| z score | z score | ||||
| 2000 | –0.46 | –1.51 | 0.17 | 0.94 | |
| 2001 | –0.43 | –1.42 | 0.11 | –0.25 | |
| 2002 | –0.27 | –0.82 | 0.84 | 3.62† | |
| 2003 | –0.14 | –0.34 | 0.99 | 4.24† | |
| 2004 | –0.34 | –1.14 | 0.13 | 4.64† | |
| 2005 | –0.24 | –0.72 | 0.74 | 3.09† | |
| 2006 | –0.36 | –1.25 | 0.71 | 2.91† | |
*Moran’s I statistics with z score test value to detect the spatial distribution of tuberculosis (TB) in the 2 populations. A statistically significant (z score >1.96) estimate of I indicates that nearby districts (within 10 km) have a similar prevalence rate of TB and the cases are likely to cluster at the district level. †Statistically significant, p<0.05 as measured by z score >1.96.
Results from Model 2: differences in prevalence rate of TB among the districts*
| Parameter | Estimate | Standard error | χ2 value | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | ||||
| Constant† | –8.280 | 0.096 | 7378.941 | <0.001 |
| Level 2 | ||||
| Error term associated with TB prevalence‡ | 0.150 | 0.056 | 7.229 | 0.0071 |
*TB, tuberculosis. †In this statistical model, the constant term represents the rate of TB by district. ‡If the error term is statistically significant, it indicates that there are differences in the prevalence rate of TB at the district level (but does not identify which districts are different and the degree of difference).
Results from Model 3: differences in TB prevalence by district, origin of cases, gender and age of cases*
| Parameter | Estimate | Standard error | χ2 value | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | ||||
| Constant | –9.823 | 0.117 | 6993.521 | <0.001 |
| Zone | 0.795 | 0.144 | 30.397 | <0.001 |
| Age | 0.948 | 0.035 | 737.1151 | <0.001 |
| Gender | 0.501 | 0.031 | 269.385 | <0.001 |
| Level 2 | ||||
| Error terms combined | 0.200 | 0.069 | 8.330 | <0.005 |
| Error term associated with TB prevalence† | –0.067 | 0.068 | 0.965 | 0.3259 |
| Error term associated with origin (zone) of cases‡ | 0.342 | 0.124 | 7.603 | <0.005 |
*TB, tuberculosis. †If the error term is statistically significant, it indicates that there are differences in the prevalence rate of TB at the district level (but doesn’t identify which districts are different and the degree of difference). ‡If the error term is statistically significant, it indicates that there are differences in the prevalence rate of TB by origin (zone) of cases (but doesn’t identify which the degree of difference between origins).