| Literature DB >> 26641642 |
Atikaimu Wubuli1,2, Feng Xue3, Daobin Jiang4, Xuemei Yao1, Halmurat Upur5, Qimanguli Wushouer4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Xinjiang is one of the high TB burden provinces of China. A spatial analysis was conducted using geographical information system (GIS) technology to improve the understanding of geographic variation of the pulmonary TB occurrence in Xinjiang, its predictors, and to search for targeted interventions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26641642 PMCID: PMC4671667 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The trend of pulmonary TB incidence from 2005 to 2013.
Fig 2The incidence of pulmonary TB cases in Xinjiang, from 2005–2009.
Fig 5The incidence of SS+TB cases in Xinjiang, from 2010–2013.
Results of the global spatial autocorrelation analysis of pulmonary TB incidence from 2005–2013.
| Year | Pulmonary TB incidence | SS+ TB incidence | SS- TB incidence | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moran`s I | Z |
| Moran`s I | Z |
| Moran`s I | Z |
| |
| 2005 | 0.695 | 18.497 | <0.0001 | 0.729 | 19.389 | <0.0001 | 0.264 | 7.132 | <0.0001 |
| 2006 | 0.736 | 19.328 | <0.0001 | 0.749 | 19.712 | <0.0001 | 0.590 | 15.560 | <0.0001 |
| 2007 | 0.728 | 19.130 | <0.0001 | 0.755 | 19.873 | <0.0001 | 0.523 | 13.821 | <0.0001 |
| 2008 | 0.713 | 18.746 | <0.0001 | 0.636 | 16.757 | <0.0001 | 0.563 | 14.847 | <0.0001 |
| 2009 | 0.623 | 16.429 | <0.0001 | 0.344 | 9.464 | <0.0001 | 0.470 | 12.525 | <0.0001 |
| 2010 | 0.599 | 15.818 | <0.0001 | 0.496 | 13.088 | <0.0001 | 0.404 | 10.804 | <0.0001 |
| 2011 | 0.612 | 16.108 | <0.0001 | 0.258 | 7.026 | <0.0001 | 0.455 | 12.148 | <0.0001 |
| 2012 | 0.810 | 21.228 | <0.0001 | 0.426 | 11.327 | <0.0001 | 0.775 | 20.336 | <0.0001 |
| 2013 | 0.786 | 20.634 | <0.0001 | 0.421 | 11.013 | <0.0001 | 0.741 | 19.449 | <0.0001 |
| Annualized average incidence | 0.78 | 20.733 | <0.0001 | 0.717 | 18.843 | <0.0001 | 0.696 | 18.277 | <0.0001 |
Fig 6The trend of Global Moran`s I value for pulmonary TB incidence from 2005 to 2013.
Fig 7Clusters of the Anselin Local Moran’s I analysis, from 2005–2009.
Fig 8Clusters of the Anselin Local Moran’s I analysis, from 2010–2013.
Fig 9Hotspot Analysis with Getis-Ord Gi* statistic, from 2008–2009.
Fig 10Hotspot Analysis with Getis-Ord Gi* statistic, from 2010–2013.
Summary of hotspot/coldspot clusters of annualized average incidence of pulmonary TB in Xinjiang.
| Types of clusters | Intensity of clusters | Numbers of counties | County/districts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hotspots | Primary | 28 | Aksu City, Uxturpan County, Awat County, Kalpin County, Artux City, Akto County, Akqi County, Ulugqat County, Kashgar City, Shufu County, Shule County, Yengisar County, Poskam County, Yarkent County, Kagilik County, Makit County, Yopurga County, Payzawat County, Maralbexi County, Taxkorgan Tajik Autonomous County, Hotan City, Hotan County, Karakax County, Guma County, Lop County, Qira County, Keriya County, Niya County |
| Secondary | 2 | Onsu County, Xayar County | |
| Coldspots | Primary | 40 | Tianshan District, Shayibak District, Xinshi District, Shui Mogou District, Tou Tunhe District, Da Bancheng District, Midong District, Urumqi County, Dushanzi District, Karamay District, Urhe District, Bai Jiantan District, Changji City, Fukang City, Hutubi County, Manas County, Qitai County, Jimsar County, Mori Kazak Autonomous County, Turpan City, Piqan County, Toksun County, Kuytun City, Kunes County, Nilka County, Bortala City, Jing County, Araxang County, Usu City, Dorbiljin County, Shawan County, Toli County, Yumin County, Hoboksar Mongol Autonomous County, Burultokay County, Korla City, Yanji Hui Autonomous County, Hejing County, Hoxud County, Bagrax County |
| Secondary | 6 | Lopnur County, Bugur County, Qinggil County, Koktokay County, Qoqak City, Barkol Kazak Autonomous County. | |
| tertiary | 1 | Tokkuztara County, |
Summary of OLS and SLM regression model.
| Model | Parameter | Coefficient | Std.Error | t / z | Probability | Log-Likelihood | AIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OLS | Constant | 11.2189 | 24.8464 | 0.45 | 0.65 | -434.55 | 883.89 |
| Proportion of minorities | 2.1573 | 0.2593 | 8.32 | <0.01 | |||
| per capita GDP | -0.0005 | 0.0003 | -2.06 | 0.04 | |||
| SLM | Wy | 0.3881 | 0.0946 | 4.10 | <0.01 | -427.61 | 864.48 |
| Constant | -22.5312 | 23.3347 | -0.96 | 0.33 | |||
| Proportion of minorities | 1.7004 | 0.2583 | 6.58 | <0.01 | |||
| per capita GDP | -0.0002 | 0.0003 | -0.49 | 0.62 |
Summary of GWR model coefficients.
| Parameter | Minimum | 25% quartile | 50% quartile | 75% quartile | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | -32.69 | -14.66 | 1.76 | 11.32 | 139.38 |
| Proportion of minorities | 1.07 | 1.76 | 2.01 | 2.39 | 2.68 |
| Per capita GDP | -0.0027 | -0.0001 | 0.0000 | 0.0001 | 0.0002 |
| Condition number | 6.39 | 7.25 | 7.81 | 13.49 | 29.99 |
| Local R2 | 0.2506 | 0.5271 | 0.5972 | 0.6366 | 0.6940 |
Fig 11Coefficients of predictors and standard residuals of GWR.
(A) Coefficients of proportion of minorities. (B) Coefficients of per capita GDP. (C) Standard residual of GWR.