| Literature DB >> 29561763 |
Benjamin B Kasten1, Patsy G Oliver2, Harrison Kim3, Jinda Fan4, Soldano Ferrone5, Kurt R Zinn6, Donald J Buchsbaum7.
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with a poor prognosis. There is a clinical need for effective, targeted therapy strategies that destroy both differentiated TNBC cells and TNBC cancer initiating cells (CICs), as the latter are implicated in the metastasis and recurrence of TNBC. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4) is overexpressed on differentiated tumor cells and CICs obtained from TNBC patient specimens, suggesting that CSPG4 may be a clinically relevant target for the imaging and therapy of TNBC. The purpose of this study was to determine whether α-particle radioimmunotherapy (RIT) targeting TNBC cells using the CSPG4-specific monoclonal antibody (mAb) 225.28 as a carrier was effective at eliminating TNBC tumors in preclinical models. To this end, mAb 225.28 labeled with 212Pb (212Pb-225.28) as a source of α-particles for RIT was used for in vitro Scatchard assays and clonogenic survival assays with human TNBC cells (SUM159 and 2LMP) grown as adherent cells or non-adherent CIC-enriched mammospheres. Immune-deficient mice bearing orthotopic SUM159 or 2LMP xenografts were injected i.v. with the targeted (225.28) or irrelevant isotype-matched control (F3-C25) mAbs, labeled with 99mTc, 125I, or 212Pb for in vivo imaging, biodistribution, or tumor growth inhibition studies. 212Pb-225.28 bound to adherent SUM159 and 2LMP cells and to CICs from SUM159 and 2LMP mammospheres with a mean affinity of 0.5 nM. Nearly ten times more binding sites per cell were present on SUM159 cells and CICs compared with 2LMP cells. 212Pb-225.28 was six to seven times more effective than 212Pb-F3-C25 at inhibiting SUM159 cell and CIC clonogenic survival (p < 0.05). Radiolabeled mAb 225.28 showed significantly higher uptake than radiolabeled mAb F3-C25 in SUM159 and 2LMP xenografts (p < 0.05), and the uptake of 212Pb-225.28 in TNBC xenografts was correlated with target epitope expression. 212Pb-225.28 caused dose-dependent growth inhibition of SUM159 xenografts; 0.30 MBq 212Pb-225.28 was significantly more effective than 0.33 MBq 212Pb-F3-C25 at inhibiting tumor growth (p < 0.01). These results suggest that CSPG4-specific 212Pb-225.28 is a useful reagent for RIT of CSPG4-expressing tumors, including metastatic TNBC.Entities:
Keywords: 212Pb; CSPG4; radioimmunotherapy; triple-negative breast cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29561763 PMCID: PMC5979285 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19040925
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
In vitro binding analysis of 212Pb-225.28 to human triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells and cancer-initiating cells (CICs).
| a | a Binding Sites/Cell ± SEM (×103) | Internalization (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adherent SUM159 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 29 ± 4.2 | 56 |
| CIC SUM159 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 49 ± 12 | 57 |
| Adherent 2LMP | 0.5 ± 0.1 | b 3.4 | 49 |
| CIC 2LMP | 0.5 ± 0.2 | b 7.7 | 47 |
a Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of 1–3 individual experiments, with each experiment performed with duplicate wells. b Mean of a single experiment performed with duplicate wells.
In vitro inhibition of SUM159 cells and CIC clonogenic survival by 212Pb-225.28 or 212Pb-F3-C25.
| Cells | a IC50 ± SEM (kBq/mL) | |
|---|---|---|
| 212Pb-225.28 | 212Pb-F3-C25 | |
| Adherent SUM159 | 22 ± 10 | 144 ± 19 |
| CIC SUM159 | 12 ± 3 | 86 ± 10 |
a Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of two individual experiments, with each experiment performed with 4–6 replicate wells.
Figure 1Biodistribution results at 24 h after i.v. injection of 0.78 MBq 212Pb-225.28 or 212Pb-F3-C25 in groups of athymic nude mice (n = 4/group) bearing small SUM159 xenografts implanted in the mammary fat pad. Data are presented as mean % ID/g ± standard deviation, and the difference in the tumor uptake between the two groups was analyzed by Student’s t-test (not significant).
Figure 2Biodistribution results in athymic nude mice bearing human TNBC xenograft tumors. Groups of mice (n = 5/group) bearing large SUM159 xenografts (A) or 2LMP xenografts (B) were injected i.v. with a solution containing 0.68 MBq 212Pb-225.28 and 16.3 kBq 125I-F3-C25. Mice were euthanized at 24 h post injection, when selected tissues were removed, weighed, and counted with a gamma counter to determine the % ID/g of tissue for each radionuclide. 125I was counted after 212Pb had fully decayed. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations, and the difference in the uptake between 212Pb and 125I in each group of tumors was analyzed by Student’s t-tests. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 3Biodistribution results at 24 h after injection of 99mTc-225.28 or 99mTc-F3-C25 in the groups of athymic nude mice (n = 3–4/group) bearing large SUM159 xenografts implanted in the mammary fat pad. Mice were euthanized at 24 h post injection, when selected tissues were removed, weighed, and counted in a gamma counter to determine the % ID/g of tissue. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations, and the difference in the tumor uptake between the two groups was analyzed by Student’s t-tests. * p < 0.05.
Figure 4In vivo tumor growth curves showing the effects of 212Pb-225.28 or 212Pb-F3-C25 on human TNBC xenograft growth inhibition. Groups of mice (n = 10/group) bearing small SUM159 tumors either were left untreated (filled circles) or injected i.v. with 0.33 MBq 212Pb-F3-C25 (open circles) or with 0.14 MBq (filled squares), 0.30 MBq (upward triangles), or 0.48 MBq (downward triangles) 212Pb-225.28. Data were plotted as mean percent change (±standard error of the mean) in normalized tumor volume over time relative to the initial volume at the time of injection with the RIC, and analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s comparison. ** p < 0.01 or *** p < 0.001 vs. 212Pb-F3-C25 at day 29 after dosing.