Literature DB >> 26788219

Putative cancer-initiating stem cells in cell culture models for molecular subtypes of clinical breast cancer.

Nitin Telang1.   

Abstract

Cancer-initiating stem cells (CISC) represent a minor subpopulation of heterogeneous breast cancer. CISC are responsible for the acquired resistance to conventional chemoendocrine therapy and eventual relapse observed in patients with breast cancer. Certain molecular subtypes of clinical breast cancer that exhibit differential expression of genes coding for hormone and growth factor receptors differ in their response to conventional chemoendocrine therapy and targeted therapeutic inhibitors. Thus, the development of reliable cell culture models for CISC may provide a valuable experimental approach for the study of stem cell-targeted therapy for the treatment of breast cancer. The present study utilized optimized cell culture systems as experimental models for different molecular subtypes of clinical breast cancer, including luminal A, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2-enriched and triple negative breast cancer. Biomarker end points, including control of homeostatic growth, cancer risk and drug resistance, were quantitatively analyzed in the selected models. The results of the analyses indicated that, compared with the non-tumorigenic controls, the cell models representing the aforementioned molecular subtypes of clinical breast cancer exhibited aberrant cell cycle progression, downregulated cellular apoptosis and loss of control of homeostatic growth, as evidenced by hyperproliferation. Additionally, these models displayed persistent cancer risk, as indicated by their high incidence and frequency of anchorage-independent (AI) colony formation in vitro and their tumor development capacity in vivo. Furthermore, in the presence of maximum cytostatic drug concentrations, the drug-resistant phenotypes isolated from the parental drug-sensitive cell lines representing luminal A, HER-2-enriched and triple negative breast cancer exhibited an 11.5, 5.0 and 6.2 fold increase in cell growth, and a 5.6, 5.4 and 4.4 fold increase in the number of AI colonies, respectively, compared with the drug-sensitive controls. Collectively, the data of the present study demonstrated the presence of putative CISC in these breast cancer models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; cancer stem cell models

Year:  2015        PMID: 26788219      PMCID: PMC4665642          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  27 in total

1.  Inhibition of proliferation and modulation of estradiol metabolism: novel mechanisms for breast cancer prevention by the phytochemical indole-3-carbinol.

Authors:  N T Telang; M Katdare; H L Bradlow; M P Osborne; J Fishman
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1997-11

Review 2.  Biological determinants of endocrine resistance in breast cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Musgrove; Robert L Sutherland
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 3.  Tumour stem cells and drug resistance.

Authors:  Michael Dean; Tito Fojo; Susan Bates
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 4.  Triple-negative breast cancer: therapeutic options.

Authors:  Susan Cleator; Wolfgang Heller; R Charles Coombes
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Edward H Romond; Edith A Perez; John Bryant; Vera J Suman; Charles E Geyer; Nancy E Davidson; Elizabeth Tan-Chiu; Silvana Martino; Soonmyung Paik; Peter A Kaufman; Sandra M Swain; Thomas M Pisansky; Louis Fehrenbacher; Leila A Kutteh; Victor G Vogel; Daniel W Visscher; Greg Yothers; Robert B Jenkins; Ann M Brown; Shaker R Dakhil; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Wilma L Lingle; Pamela M Klein; James N Ingle; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Novel anticancer targets: revisiting ERBB2 and discovering ERBB3.

Authors:  José Baselga; Sandra M Swain
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  PI3K inhibition impairs BRCA1/2 expression and sensitizes BRCA-proficient triple-negative breast cancer to PARP inhibition.

Authors:  Yasir H Ibrahim; Celina García-García; Violeta Serra; Lei He; Kristine Torres-Lockhart; Aleix Prat; Pilar Anton; Patricia Cozar; Marta Guzmán; Judit Grueso; Olga Rodríguez; Maria Teresa Calvo; Claudia Aura; Orland Díez; Isabel T Rubio; José Pérez; Jordi Rodón; Javier Cortés; Leif W Ellisen; Maurizio Scaltriti; José Baselga
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 39.397

8.  Chemoprevention of breast cancer with retinoids.

Authors:  U Veronesi; G De Palo; A Costa; F Formelli; E Marubini; M Del Vecchio
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1992

9.  Association of breast cancer stem cells identified by aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 expression with resistance to sequential Paclitaxel and epirubicin-based chemotherapy for breast cancers.

Authors:  Tomonori Tanei; Koji Morimoto; Kenzo Shimazu; Seung Jin Kim; Yoshio Tanji; Tetsuya Taguchi; Yasuhiro Tamaki; Shinzaburo Noguchi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  Multidrug-resistant breast cancer: current perspectives.

Authors:  Heather L Martin; Laura Smith; Darren C Tomlinson
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2014-01-10
View more
  10 in total

1.  Anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects of rosemary and constituent terpenoids in a model for the HER-2-enriched molecular subtype of clinical breast cancer.

Authors:  Nitin Telang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Inhibitory effects of Chinese nutritional herbs in isogenic breast carcinoma cells with modulated estrogen receptor function.

Authors:  Nitin Telang; Guo Li; Meena Katdare; Daniel Sepkovic; Leon Bradlow; George Wong
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Growth inhibitory efficacy of Cornus officinalis in a cell culture model for triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Nitin T Telang; Hareesh B Nair; George Y C Wong
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Anti-inflammatory drug resistance selects putative cancer stem cells in a cellular model for genetically predisposed colon cancer.

Authors:  Nitin Telang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Growth inhibitory efficacy of natural products in a model for triple negative molecular subtype of clinical breast cancer.

Authors:  Nitin Telang
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2017-08-01

6.  Apatinib suppresses breast cancer cells proliferation and invasion via angiomotin inhibition.

Authors:  Haige Zhang; Jing Sun; Wencui Ju; Bin Li; Yunfeng Lou; Guoqiang Zhang; Gaofeng Liang; Xiaoyong Luo
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.060

7.  The nutritional herb Epimedium grandiflorum inhibits the growth in a model for the Luminal A molecular subtype of breast cancer.

Authors:  Nitin T Telang; Gou Li; Meena Katdare; Daniel W Sepkovic; H Leon Bradlow; George Y C Wong
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Involvement of breast cancer stem cells in tumor angiogenesis.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Chen Li; Yuqiang Li; Zhitu Zhu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  212Pb-Labeled Antibody 225.28 Targeted to Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycan 4 for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Therapy in Mouse Models.

Authors:  Benjamin B Kasten; Patsy G Oliver; Harrison Kim; Jinda Fan; Soldano Ferrone; Kurt R Zinn; Donald J Buchsbaum
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Changes in Tumor Stem Cell Markers and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Markers in Nonluminal Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Their Correlation with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.

Authors:  Xiaoling Leng; Guofu Huang; Lianhua Zhang; Jianbing Ding; Fucheng Ma
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.