Jessie R Nedrow1, Anders Josefsson1, Sunju Park1, Tom Bäck2, Robert F Hobbs3, Cory Brayton4, Frank Bruchertseifer5, Alfred Morgenstern5, George Sgouros6. 1. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, CRBII 4M.61, 1550 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA. 2. The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 5. European Commission Joint Research Centre, Directorate for Nuclear Safety and Security, Karlsruhe, Germany. 6. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, CRBII 4M.61, 1550 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA. gsgouros@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with external beam radiation have shown a therapeutic advantage over each modality alone. The purpose of these works is to evaluate the potential of targeted delivery of high LET radiation to the tumor microenvironment via an immune checkpoint inhibitor. METHODS: The impact of protein concentration on the distribution of 111In-DTPA-anti-PD-L1-BC, an 111In-antibody conjugate targeted to PD-L1, was evaluated in an immunocompetent mouse model of breast cancer. 225Ac-DOTA-anti-PD-L1-BC was evaluated by both macroscale (ex vivo biodistribution) and microscale (alpha-camera images at a protein concentration determined by the 111In data. RESULTS: The evaluation of 111In-DTPA-anti-PD-L1-BC at 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg highlighted the impact of protein concentration on the distribution of the labeled antibody, particularly in the blood, spleen, thymus, and tumor. Alpha-camera images for the microscale distribution of 225Ac-DOTA-anti-PD-L1-BC showed a uniform distribution in the liver while highly non-uniform distributions were obtained in the thymus, spleen, kidney, and tumor. At an antibody dose of 3 mg/kg, the liver was dose-limiting with an absorbed dose of 738 mGy/kBq; based upon blood activity concentration measurements, the marrow absorbed dose was 29 mGy/kBq. CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrate that 225Ac-DOTA-anti-PD-L1-BC is capable of delivering high LET radiation to PD-L1 tumors. The use of a surrogate SPECT agent, 111In-DTPA-anti-PD-L1-BC, is beneficial in optimizing the dose delivered to the tumor sites. Furthermore, an accounting of the microscale distribution of the antibody in preclinical studies was essential to the proper interpretation of organ absorbed doses and their likely relation to biologic effect.
BACKGROUND: Studies combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with external beam radiation have shown a therapeutic advantage over each modality alone. The purpose of these works is to evaluate the potential of targeted delivery of high LET radiation to the tumor microenvironment via an immune checkpoint inhibitor. METHODS: The impact of protein concentration on the distribution of 111In-DTPA-anti-PD-L1-BC, an 111In-antibody conjugate targeted to PD-L1, was evaluated in an immunocompetent mouse model of breast cancer. 225Ac-DOTA-anti-PD-L1-BC was evaluated by both macroscale (ex vivo biodistribution) and microscale (alpha-camera images at a protein concentration determined by the 111In data. RESULTS: The evaluation of 111In-DTPA-anti-PD-L1-BC at 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg highlighted the impact of protein concentration on the distribution of the labeled antibody, particularly in the blood, spleen, thymus, and tumor. Alpha-camera images for the microscale distribution of 225Ac-DOTA-anti-PD-L1-BC showed a uniform distribution in the liver while highly non-uniform distributions were obtained in the thymus, spleen, kidney, and tumor. At an antibody dose of 3 mg/kg, the liver was dose-limiting with an absorbed dose of 738 mGy/kBq; based upon blood activity concentration measurements, the marrow absorbed dose was 29 mGy/kBq. CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrate that 225Ac-DOTA-anti-PD-L1-BC is capable of delivering high LET radiation to PD-L1 tumors. The use of a surrogate SPECT agent, 111In-DTPA-anti-PD-L1-BC, is beneficial in optimizing the dose delivered to the tumor sites. Furthermore, an accounting of the microscale distribution of the antibody in preclinical studies was essential to the proper interpretation of organ absorbed doses and their likely relation to biologic effect.
Authors: Charlie C Pan; Brian D Kavanagh; Laura A Dawson; X Allen Li; Shiva K Das; Moyed Miften; Randall K Ten Haken Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: María E Rodriguez-Ruiz; Inmaculada Rodriguez; Saray Garasa; Benigno Barbes; Jose Luis Solorzano; Jose Luis Perez-Gracia; Sara Labiano; Miguel F Sanmamed; Arantza Azpilikueta; Elixabet Bolaños; Alfonso R Sanchez-Paulete; M Angela Aznar; Ana Rouzaut; Kurt A Schalper; Maria Jure-Kunkel; Ignacio Melero Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2016-08-22 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Suzanne L Topalian; F Stephen Hodi; Julie R Brahmer; Scott N Gettinger; David C Smith; David F McDermott; John D Powderly; Richard D Carvajal; Jeffrey A Sosman; Michael B Atkins; Philip D Leming; David R Spigel; Scott J Antonia; Leora Horn; Charles G Drake; Drew M Pardoll; Lieping Chen; William H Sharfman; Robert A Anders; Janis M Taube; Tracee L McMiller; Haiying Xu; Alan J Korman; Maria Jure-Kunkel; Shruti Agrawal; Daniel McDonald; Georgia D Kollia; Ashok Gupta; Jon M Wigginton; Mario Sznol Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-06-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Anders Josefsson; Jessie R Nedrow; Sunju Park; Sangeeta Ray Banerjee; Andrew Rittenbach; Fabien Jammes; Benjamin Tsui; George Sgouros Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Jessie R Nedrow; Joseph D Latoche; Kathryn E Day; Jalpa Modi; Tanushree Ganguly; Dexing Zeng; Brenda F Kurland; Clifford E Berkman; Carolyn J Anderson Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: D A Scheinberg; D Lovett; C R Divgi; M C Graham; E Berman; K Pentlow; N Feirt; R D Finn; B D Clarkson; T S Gee Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1991-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael E Autenrieth; Christof Seidl; Frank Bruchertseifer; Thomas Horn; Florian Kurtz; Benedikt Feuerecker; Calogero D'Alessandria; Christian Pfob; Stephan Nekolla; Christos Apostolidis; Saed Mirzadeh; Jürgen E Gschwend; Markus Schwaiger; Klemens Scheidhauer; Alfred Morgenstern Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-04-11 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Benjamin B Kasten; Patsy G Oliver; Harrison Kim; Jinda Fan; Soldano Ferrone; Kurt R Zinn; Donald J Buchsbaum Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Narges K Tafreshi; Michael L Doligalski; Christopher J Tichacek; Darpan N Pandya; Mikalai M Budzevich; Ghassan El-Haddad; Nikhil I Khushalani; Eduardo G Moros; Mark L McLaughlin; Thaddeus J Wadas; David L Morse Journal: Molecules Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 4.411