| Literature DB >> 29560451 |
Yasuhiro Uwadaira1, Yasuyo Sekiyama1, Akifumi Ikehata1.
Abstract
Evaluating the maturity of peach fruit is desirable during both the preharvest and postharvest periods, and flesh firmness (FF) is a representative maturity index. Although a non-destructive FF measurement technique using visible (VIS) and near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy has been developed, the principle has been unclear. This study was conducted to examine the structure of the FF prediction model by comparing with that of the model for measuring water-soluble pectin (WSP) content. Those two prediction models have the same information regions related to the colors of pericarp and mesocarp (chlorophyll) and to a water band in the NIR region. Moreover, a statistical heterospectroscopy analysis between NIR and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra suggests the possibility that absorptions of methanol and succinate as well as galacturonic acid embedded in a water band play important roles in predicting FF. This approach would enhance the reliability of nondestructive VIS-NIR prediction models in many practical situations.Entities:
Keywords: Analytical chemistry; Food science
Year: 2018 PMID: 29560451 PMCID: PMC5857633 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00531
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1Measurement of VIS-NIR spectra of the intact fruit with a commercial portable spectrometer.
Fig. 2Time-dependent changes in the non-destructive maturity indices for five monitoring samples.
Statistics of the maturity indices.
| Index | Min | Mean | Max | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethylene (ng kg−1 s−1) | 0.17 | 3.24 | 8.24 | 1.80 |
| N2 (mg kg−1 s−1) | 1.59 | 2.90 | 3.87 | 0.62 |
| O2 (mg kg−1 s−1) | 0.23 | 0.43 | 0.57 | 0.09 |
| CO2 (mg kg−1 s−1) | 0.021 | 0.025 | 0.032 | 0.002 |
| pH | 4.00 | 4.48 | 5.00 | 0.22 |
| SSC (%) | 9.5 | 12.6 | 17.8 | 1.7 |
| FF (N) | 5.29 | 13.90 | 39.98 | 8.10 |
| WSP in AIS (g kg−1) | 36.34 | 163.22 | 267.14 | 64.26 |
SD: standard deviation, SSC: soluble solid content, FF: flesh firmness, WSP: water-soluble pectin, AIS: alcohol-insoluble solids.
Fig. 3Time-dependent changes in mean values of the maturity indices for five fruits that were sampled each day.
Fig. 4(a) Raw and (b) baseline corrected spectra of the intact peach fruit. The spectra were averaged for each day and the line color gradually darkened with each day.
Statistics of the partial least squares (PLS) regression models.
| Index | N | LVs | R2 | RMSEC | RMSECV | Bias | RPD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FF (N) | 80 | 9 | 0.80 | 3.60 | 4.41 | 0.07 | 1.67 |
| WSP in AIS (g kg−1) | 40 | 9 | 0.82 | 27.08 | 41.16 | −2.50 | 1.31 |
| ED | 40 | 10 | 0.90 | 0.70 | 1.05 | −0.05 | 2.03 |
N: number of samples, LVs: number of latent variables, R2: determination coefficient of calibration, RMSEC: root mean squared error of calibration, RMSECV: root mean squared error of cross-validation. Bias: mean error of calibration, RPD: ratio performance deviation, FF: flesh firmness, WSP: water-soluble pectin, AIS: alcohol-insoluble solids, ED: elapsed days.
Fig. 5(a) Regression vectors and (b) variable importance in projection (VIP) of the partial least squares (PLS) regression models for measuring flesh firmness (FF), water-soluble pectin (WSP), and elapsed days (ED) from the harvest.
Fig. 6Heat map of the correlation coefficient between the NIR signal and the NMR signal.