Literature DB >> 29560292

Resection Cavity Contraction Effects in the Use of Radioactive Sources (1-25 versus Cs-131) for Intra-Operative Brain Implants.

Dae Y Han1, Lijun Ma1, Steve Braunstein1, David Raleigh1, Patricia K Sneed1, Michael McDermott2.   

Abstract

Background and Objectives Intra-parenchymal brain surgical resection cavities usually contract in volume following low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy implants. In this study, we systematically modeled and assessed dose variability resulting from such changes for I-125 versus Cs-131 radioactive sources. Methods Resection cavity contraction was modeled based on 95 consecutive patient cases, using surveillance magnetic resonance (MR) images. The model was derived for single point source geometry and then fully simulated in 3D where I-125 or Cs-131 seeds were placed on the surface of an ellipsoidal resection cavity. Dose distribution estimated via TG-43 calculations and biological effective dose (BED) calculations were compared for both I-125 and Cs-131, accounting for resection cavity contractions. Results Resection cavity volumes were found to contract with an effective half-life of approximately 3.4 months (time to reach 50% of maximum volume contraction). As a result, significant differences in dose distributions were noted between I-125 and Cs-131 radioactive sources. For example, when comparing with static volume, assuming no contraction effect, I-125 exhibited a 31.8% and 30.5% increase in D90 and D10 values (i.e., the minimal dose to 90% and 10% of the volume respectively) in the peripheral target areas over the follow-up period of 20.5 months. In contrast, Cs-131 seeds only exhibited a 1.44% and 0.64% increase in D90 and D10 values respectively. Such discrepancy is likewise similar for BED calculations. Conclusion Resection cavity contractions affects Cs-131 dose distribution significantly less than that of I-125 for permanent brain implants. Care must be taken to account for cavity contractions when prescribing accumulative doses of a radioactive source in performing the brain implant procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brachytherapy; brain metastasis; cs-131; i-125; ldr; resection cavity

Year:  2018        PMID: 29560292      PMCID: PMC5856410          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  13 in total

1.  Direction-modulated brachytherapy for high-dose-rate treatment of cervical cancer. I: theoretical design.

Authors:  Dae Yup Han; Matthew J Webster; Daniel J Scanderbeg; Catheryn Yashar; Dongju Choi; Bongyong Song; Slobodan Devic; Ananth Ravi; William Y Song
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Interstitial brachytherapy for metastatic brain tumors.

Authors:  M Prados; S Leibel; C M Barnett; P Gutin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Dosimetry of interstitial brachytherapy sources: recommendations of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 43. American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Authors:  R Nath; L L Anderson; G Luxton; K A Weaver; J F Williamson; A S Meigooni
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Potential impact of prostate edema on the dosimetry of permanent seed implants using the new 131Cs (model CS-1) seeds.

Authors:  Zhe Chen; Jun Deng; Kenneth Roberts; Ravinder Nath
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Brachytherapy dosimetry parameters calculated for a 131Cs source.

Authors:  Mark J Rivard
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Evaluation of the new cesium-131 seed for use in low-energy x-ray brachytherapy.

Authors:  Mark K Murphy; R Kim Piper; Lawrence R Greenwood; Michael G Mitch; Paul J Lamperti; Stephen M Seltzer; Matt J Bales; Mark H Phillips
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Resection and brain brachytherapy with permanent iodine-125 sources for brain metastasis.

Authors:  David R Raleigh; Zachary A Seymour; Bryan Tomlin; Philip V Theodosopoulos; Mitchel S Berger; Manish K Aghi; Sarah E Geneser; Devan Krishnamurthy; Shannon E Fogh; Penny K Sneed; Michael W McDermott
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Cesium-131 brachytherapy for recurrent brain metastases: durable salvage treatment for previously irradiated metastatic disease.

Authors:  A Gabriella Wernicke; Andrew W Smith; Shoshana Taube; Menachem Z Yondorf; Bhupesh Parashar; Samuel Trichter; Lucy Nedialkova; Albert Sabbas; Paul Christos; Rohan Ramakrishna; Susan C Pannullo; Philip E Stieg; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Surgical resection and permanent iodine-125 brachytherapy for brain metastases.

Authors:  Kim Huang; Penny K Sneed; Sandeep Kunwar; Annemarie Kragten; David A Larson; Mitchel S Berger; Albert Chan; Jean Pouliot; Michael W McDermott
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Time-dependent tumour repopulation factors in linear-quadratic equations--implications for treatment strategies.

Authors:  R G Dale
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 6.280

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Brachytherapy for central nervous system tumors.

Authors:  Evan D Bander; Jonathan P S Knisely; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Dosimetric Impacts of Source Migration, Radioisotope Type, and Decay with Permanent Implantable Collagen Tile Brachytherapy for Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Dilini S Pinnaduwage; Shiv P Srivastava; Xiangsheng Yan; Shyam Jani; David G Brachman; Stephen P Sorensen
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

Review 3.  Evolving Strategies to Potentially Further Optimize Surgical Interventions in Brain Cancer.

Authors:  Bindi B Parikh; Elizabeth C Neil
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Comprehensive Commissioning and Clinical Implementation of GammaTiles STaRT for Intracranial Brain Cancer.

Authors:  Gregory P Penoncello; Justin D Gagneur; Sujay A Vora; Nathan Y Yu; Mirek Fatyga; Maciej M Mrugala; Bernard R Bendok; Yi Rong
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-02-05

Review 5.  GammaTile: Comprehensive Review of a Novel Radioactive Intraoperative Seed-Loading Device for the Treatment of Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Chukwuyem Ekhator; Ijeoma Nwankwo; Elya Rak; Ariel Homayoonfar; Ekokobe Fonkem; Ramin Rak
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-10-06

6.  Surgical Outcomes of Novel Collagen Tile Cesium Brachytherapy for Recurrent Intracranial Tumors at a Tertiary Referral Center.

Authors:  Kwanza T Warren; Andrew Boucher; David P Bray; Sean Dresser; Jim Zhong; Hiu-Kuo Shu; Jeffrey Olson; Kimberly Hoang
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.