Literature DB >> 16696473

Potential impact of prostate edema on the dosimetry of permanent seed implants using the new 131Cs (model CS-1) seeds.

Zhe Chen1, Jun Deng, Kenneth Roberts, Ravinder Nath.   

Abstract

Our aim in this work was to study the potential dosimetric effect of prostate edema on the accuracy of conventional pre- and post-implant dosimetry for prostate seed implants using the newly introduced 131Cs seed, whose radioactive decay half-life (approximately 9.7 days) is directly comparable to the average edema resolution half-life (approximately 10 days) observed previously by Waterman et al. for 125I implants [Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 41, 1069-1077 (1998)]. A systematic calculation of the relative dosimetry effect of prostate edema on the 131Cs implant was performed by using an analytic solution obtained previously [Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 47, 1405-1419 (2000)]. It was found that conventional preimplant dosimetry always overestimates the true delivered dose as it ignores the temporary increase of the interseed distance caused by edema. The overestimation for 131Cs implants ranged from 1.2% (for a small edema with a magnitude of 10% and a half-life of 2 days) to approximately 45% (for larger degree edema with a magnitude of 100% and a half-life of 25 days). The magnitude of pre- and post-implant dosimetry error for 131Cs implants was found to be similar to that of 103Pd implants for typical edema characteristics (magnitude < 100%, and half-life <25 days); both of which are worse compared to 125I implants. The preimplant dosimetry error for 131Cs implants cannot be compensated effectively without knowing the edema characteristics before the seed implantation. On the other hand, the error resulted from a conventional post-implant dosimetry can be minimized (to within +/-6%) for 131Cs implants if the post-implant dosimetry is performed at 10+/-2 days post seed implantation. This "optimum" post-implant dosimetry time is shorter than those determined previously for the 103Pd and 125I implants at 16+/-4 days and 6+/-1 weeks, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16696473     DOI: 10.1118/1.2179170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  7 in total

1.  AAPM recommendations on dose prescription and reporting methods for permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer: report of Task Group 137.

Authors:  Ravinder Nath; William S Bice; Wayne M Butler; Zhe Chen; Ali S Meigooni; Vrinda Narayana; Mark J Rivard; Yan Yu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Resection Cavity Contraction Effects in the Use of Radioactive Sources (1-25 versus Cs-131) for Intra-Operative Brain Implants.

Authors:  Dae Y Han; Lijun Ma; Steve Braunstein; David Raleigh; Patricia K Sneed; Michael McDermott
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-01-16

3.  The impact of prostate edema on cell survival and tumor control after permanent interstitial brachytherapy for early stage prostate cancers.

Authors:  Zhe Jay Chen; Kenneth Roberts; Roy Decker; Pradip Pathare; Sara Rockwell; Ravinder Nath
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  On the need to compensate for edema-induced dose reductions in preplanned (131)Cs prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Z Jay Chen; Jun Deng; Kenneth Roberts; Ravinder Nath
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  The impact of prostate volume changes during external-beam irradiation in consequence of HDR brachytherapy in prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Markus Karl Alfred Herrmann; Tammo Gsänger; Arne Strauss; Tereza Kertesz; Hendrik A Wolff; Hans Christiansen; Hilke Vorwerk; Clemens Friedrich Hess; Andrea Hille
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants.

Authors:  Ron S Sloboda; N Usmani; T T Monajemi; D M-C Liu
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2012-04

7.  Edema-induced changes in tumor cell surviving fraction and tumor control probability in 131Cs permanent prostate brachytherapy implant patients.

Authors:  Than S Kehwar; Heather A Jones; M Saiful Huq; Ryan P Smith
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.