Literature DB >> 29560036

Metal artefacts severely hamper magnetic resonance imaging of the rotator cuff tendons after rotator cuff repair with titanium suture anchors.

Femke F Schröder1,2, Rianne Huis In't Veld1, Lydia A den Otter1,2, Sjoerd M van Raak3, Bennie Ten Haken2, Anne J H Vochteloo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rate of retear after rotator cuff surgery is 17%. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are used for confirmative diagnosis of retear. However, because of the presence of titanium suture anchors, metal artefacts on the MRI are common. The present study evaluated the diagnostic value of MRI after rotator cuff tendon surgery with respect to assessing the integrity as well as the degeneration and atrophy of the rotator cuff tendons when titanium anchors are in place.
METHODS: Twenty patients who underwent revision surgery of the rotator cuff as a result of a clinically suspected retear between 2013 and 2015 were included. The MRI scans of these patients were retrospectively analyzed by four specialized shoulder surgeons and compared with intra-operative findings (gold standard). Sensitivity and interobserver agreement among the surgeons in assessing retears as well as the Goutallier and Warner classification were examined.
RESULTS: In 36% (range 15% to 50%) of the pre-operative MRI scans, the observers could not review the rotator cuff tendons. When the rotator cuff tendons were assessable, a diagnostic accuracy with a mean sensitivity of 0.84 (0.70 to 1.0) across the surgeons was found, with poor interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.12).
CONCLUSIONS: Metal artefacts prevented accurate diagnosis from MRI scans of rotator cuff retear in 36% of the patients studied.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; diagnostic value; interobserver agreement; metal artefacts; rotator cuff; shoulder

Year:  2017        PMID: 29560036      PMCID: PMC5851124          DOI: 10.1177/1758573217710833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  24 in total

Review 1.  MRI of the postoperative shoulder.

Authors:  Michael B Zlatkin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in determining the presence and size of recurrent rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Ali R Motamedi; Luis H Urrea; Robert E Hancock; Richard J Hawkins; Charles Ho
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 3.  MR imaging and MR arthrography of the postoperative shoulder: spectrum of normal and abnormal findings.

Authors:  Aurea V R Mohana-Borges; Christine B Chung; Donald Resnick
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 4.  Postoperative shoulder magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Laura W Bancroft; Christopher Wasyliw; Christopher Pettis; Timothy Farley
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 2.266

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging identification of rotator cuff retears after repair: interobserver and intraobserver agreement.

Authors:  Michael Khazzam; John E Kuhn; Ed Mulligan; Joseph A Abboud; Keith M Baumgarten; Robert H Brophy; Grant L Jones; Bruce Miller; Matthew Smith; Rick W Wright
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Reproducibility of histomorphologic diagnoses with special reference to the kappa statistic.

Authors:  H Svanholm; H Starklint; H J Gundersen; J Fabricius; H Barlebo; S Olsen
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.205

7.  Accuracy of MRI, MR arthrography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joseph O de Jesus; Laurence Parker; Andrea J Frangos; Levon N Nazarian
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Complications of bioabsorbable suture anchors in the shoulder.

Authors:  Aman Dhawan; Neil Ghodadra; Vasili Karas; Michael J Salata; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Magnetic resonance appearance of bioabsorbable anchor screws for double row arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs.

Authors:  Aditya C Pawaskar; Aashay Kekatpure; Nam-Su Cho; Yong-Girl Rhee; In-Ho Jeon
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Analysis of Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanners for Evaluation of Knee Pathology Based on Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Christopher S Lee; Shane M Davis; Claire McGroder; William B Stetson; Scott E Powell
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2013-12-05
View more
  3 in total

1.  Five Year Follow up of Retrospective Cohort Comparing Structural and Functional Outcome of Arthroscopic Single-row ersus Double-row Suture Bridge Repair of Large Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tear in Patients Less than or Equal to 70 Years.

Authors:  Vivek Pandey; Joseph C J; Naveen J Mathai; Sandesh Madi; Lakshmikanth H Karegowda; Jaap Willems
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-07

2.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Proximal Hamstring Repair: All-Suture Anchor Versus Titanium Suture Anchor.

Authors:  Alexander Otto; Alyssa M DiCosmo; Joshua B Baldino; Julian Mehl; Elifho Obopilwe; Mark P Cote; Andreas B Imhoff; Knut Beitzel; Augustus D Mazzocca; Katherine Coyner
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-01-02

3.  3D-Printed Double-Helical Biodegradable Iron Suture Anchor: A Rabbit Rotator Cuff Tear Model.

Authors:  Wen-Chih Liu; Chih-Hau Chang; Chung-Hwan Chen; Chun-Kuan Lu; Chun-Hsien Ma; Shin-I Huang; Wei-Lun Fan; Hsin-Hsin Shen; Pei-I Tsai; Kuo-Yi Yang; Yin-Chih Fu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.748

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.