| Literature DB >> 29559695 |
Leabaneng Tawe1,2,3, Thato Motshoge4, Pleasure Ramatlho4, Naledi Mutukwa5, Charles Waithaka Muthoga2, Ghyslaine Bruna Djeunang Dongho6,7, Axel Martinelli8,9, Elias Peloewetse4, Gianluca Russo6, Isaac Kweku Quaye10, Giacomo Maria Paganotti11,12,13.
Abstract
Identification of inter-individual variability for drug metabolism through cytochrome P450 2B6 (CYP2B6) enzyme is important for understanding the differences in clinical responses to malaria and HIV. This study evaluates the distribution of CYP2B6 alleles, haplotypes and inferred metabolic phenotypes among subjects with different ethnicity in Botswana. A total of 570 subjects were analyzed for CYP2B6 polymorphisms at position 516 G > T (rs3745274), 785 A > G (rs2279343) and 983 T > C (rs28399499). Samples were collected in three districts of Botswana where the population belongs to Bantu (Serowe/Palapye and Chobe) and San-related (Ghanzi) ethnicity. The three districts showed different haplotype composition according to the ethnic background but similar metabolic inferred phenotypes, with 59.12%, 34.56%, 2.10% and 4.21% of the subjects having, respectively, an extensive, intermediate, slow and rapid metabolic profile. The results hint at the possibility of a convergent adaptation of detoxifying metabolic phenotypes despite a different haplotype structure due to the different genetic background. The main implication is that, while there is substantial homogeneity of metabolic inferred phenotypes among the country, the response to drugs metabolized via CYP2B6 could be individually associated to an increased risk of treatment failure and toxicity. These are important facts since Botswana is facing malaria elimination and a very high HIV prevalence.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29559695 PMCID: PMC5861095 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23350-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Map of Botswana.
Genotype and allele frequencies for CYP2B6 516-785-983 SNPs and comparisons among the groups.
| District | 516 G > T | HWE ( | 785 A > G | HWE ( | 983 T > C | HWE ( | Total | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GG (%) | GT (%) | TT (%) | AA (%) | AG (%) | GG (%) | TT (%) | TC (%) | CC (%) | ||||||||
| Serowe/Palapye (S/P) | 104 (40.62) | 106 (41.41) | 46 (17.97) | 38.67 | Het-d ( | 108 (42.19) | 109 (42.58) | 39 (15.23) | 36.38 | ok | 183 (71.48) | 73 (28.52) | 0 (0.00) | 14.26 | Het-e (< | 256 |
| Chobe (Ch) | 46 (29.49) | 74 (47.44) | 36 (23.07) | 46.79 | ok | 49 (31.41) | 80 (51.28) | 27 (17.31) | 42.95 | ok | 107 (68.59) | 47 (30.13) | 2 (1.28) | 16.35 | ok ( | 156 |
| [S/P + Ch] | 150 (36.41) | 180 (43.69) | 82 (19.90) | 41.75 | Het-d ( | 157 (38.11) | 189 (45.87) | 66 (16.02) | 38.96 | ok | 290 (70.39) | 120 (29.13) | 2 (0.48) | 15.05 | Het-e (< | 412 |
| Ghanzi (GH) | 81 (51.26) | 64 (40.51) | 13 (8.23) | 28.48 | ok | 107 (67.72) | 47 (29.75) | 4 (2.53) | 17.41 | ok | 128 (81.01) | 30 (18.99) | 0 (0.00) | 9.49 | ok | 158 |
| All | 231 (40.53) | 244 (42.81) | 95 (16.66) | 38.07 | Het-d ( | 264 (46.32) | 236 (41.40) | 70 (12.28) | 32.98 | ok | 418 (73.33) | 150 (26.31) | 2 (0.36) | 13.51 | Het-e (< | 570 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| S/P vs Ch | 4.93 ( | 1.39 (1.04–1.87) | 3.1 ( | 1.31 (0.97–1.76) | 0.51 ( | 1.17 (0.78–1.76) | ||||||||||
| S/P vs GH | 8.50 ( | 0.63 (0.46–0.86) | 33.61 (≪ | 0.37 (0.26–0.52 | 3.65 ( | 0.63 (0.39–10.1) | ||||||||||
| Ch vs GH | 21.67 (≪ | 0.45 (0.32–0.64 | 47.48 (≪ | 0.28 (0.19–0.41) | 5.97 ( | 0.54 (0.32–0.89) | ||||||||||
| [S/P + Ch] vs GH | 16.49 (≪ | 0.55 (0.41–0.74) | 47.02 (≪ | 0.33 (0.24–0.46) | 5.57( | 0.59 (0.38–0.92) | ||||||||||
HWE: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test (with P, when significant). Het-d: significant heterozygous defect; Het-e: significant heterozygous eccess.
Comparisons were made among districts of different ethnic composition (pairwise or combined) for each SNP.
Pairwise LD analysis for the three polymorphic loci. Chi-square values and P-value for LD analysis were obtained using Arlequin. Significance is assumed for P < 0.05.
| District | Comparison | Chi-square | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serowe/Palapye | 516 vs 785 | 198.19 | <0.00001 |
| Serowe/Palapye | 516 vs 983 | 22.54 | <0.00001 |
| Serowe/Palapye | 785 vs 983 | 25.36 | <0.00001 |
| Chobe | 516 vs 785 | 147.27 | <0.00001 |
| Chobe | 516 vs 983 | 5.94 | 0.014760 |
| Chobe | 785 vs 983 | 8.32 | 0.003920 |
| Ghanzi | 516 vs 785 | 81.29 | <0.00001 |
| Ghanzi | 516 vs 983 | 4.79 | 0.028660 |
| Ghanzi | 785 vs 983 | 4.88 | 0.027110 |
Haplotype frequencies by district and for all the samples combined. Maximum-likelihood (ML) haplotype frequencies were calculated using the EM algorithm in Arlequin.
| Haplotype | Absolute and (ML) frequencies | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S/P | Ch | Gh | All | ||
| GAT |
| 271 (0.52) | 145 (0.45) | 210 (0.66) | 626 (0.54) |
| TGT |
| 113 (0.22) | 90 (0.30) | 38 (0.13) | 241 (0.22) |
| TGC | 49 (0.09) | 35 (0.10) | 13 (0.03) | 97 (0.08) | |
| TAT |
| 33 (0.07) | 19 (0.06) | 35 (0.11) | 87 (0.08) |
| GAC |
| 18 (0.04) | 12 (0.05) | 12 (0.04) | 42 (0.04) |
| GGT |
| 22 (0.05) | 7 (0.02) | 3 (0.01) | 32 (0.03) |
| TAC | 3 (0.01) | 2 (0.01) | 4 (0.01) | 9 (0.01) | |
| GGC |
| 3 (0.01) | 2 (0.01) | 1 (0.00) | 6 (0.01) |
Results of the Tajima’s D neutrality test. Tests were performed with DnaSP v6. P-values are provided in brackets.
| Population | Serowe/Palapye (S/P) | Chobe (Ch) | [S/P + Ch] | Ghanzi (Gh) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tajima’s D ( | 2.39583 (<0.05) | 2.50852 (<0.05) | 2.63745 (<0.05) | 1.25562 (>0.1) |
Distribution of the inferred metabolic phenotype and scores by district, and Kolmogorv-Smirnov (K-S) D statistics with associated P values to test the normal distribution of data.
| District | PM (−3) | Expected metabolic phenotypes (with scores) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM (−2) | I (−1) | EM (0) | I (+1) | UR (+2) | Total | K-S | ||
| Serowe/Palapye | 0 | 4 | 86 | 150 | 14 | 2 | 256 | 0.34 ( |
| Chobe | 1* | 4* | 56 | 90 | 5 | 0 | 156 | 0.38 ( |
| Ghanzi | 0 | 3 | 55 | 97 | 3 | 0 | 158 | 0.38 ( |
| Total | 1 | 11 | 197 | 337 | 22 | 2 | 570 | 0.36 ( |
Score attribution was made according to: 516 TT = −2; 516 GT = −1; 516 GG = 0; 785 GG = +2; 785 AG = +1; 785 AA = 0; 983 CC = −2; 983 TC = −1; 983 TT = 0. We performed a summation for each genotype (516, 983 and 785) per sample to obtain the “metabolic score”. PM: poor metabolisers; I: intermediate metabolisers; EM: extensive metabolisers; UR: ultra-rapid metabolisers. (*two 983CC genotypes were found in Chobe).
Figure 2Distribution of the inferred metabolic scores by districts. PM = poor metabolisers; I = intermediate metabolisers (either with delayed or increased metabolism); EM = extensive or ‘normal’ metabolisers; UR = ultra-rapid metabolisers.