Scott J Lee1, Jiamin Liu2, Jianhua Yao2, Andrew Kanarek1, Ronald M Summers2, Perry J Pickhardt1. 1. 1 Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health , Madison, WI , USA. 2. 2 Imaging Biomarkers and Computer-Aided Diagnosis Laboratory, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center , Bethesda, MD , USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate a fully automated CT-based adiposity tool, applying it to a longitudinal adult screening cohort. METHODS: A validated automated adipose tissue segmentation algorithm was applied to non-contrast abdominal CT scans in 8852 consecutive asymptomatic adults (mean age, 57.1 years; 3926 M/4926 F) undergoing colonography screening. The tool was also applied to follow-up CT scans in a subset of 1584 individuals undergoing longitudinal surveillance (mean interval, 5.6 years). Visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT and SAT) volumes were segmented at levels T12-L5. Primary adipose results are reported herein for the L1 level as mean cross-sectional area. CT-based adipose measurements at initial CT and change over time were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean VAT values were significantly higher in males (205.8 ± 107.5 vs 108.1 ± 82.4 cm2; p < 0.001), whereas mean SAT values were significantly higher in females (171.3 ± 111.3 vs 124.3 ± 79.7 cm2; p < 0.001). The VAT/SAT ratio at L1 was three times higher in males (1.8 ± 0.7 vs 0.6 ± 0.4; p < 0.001). At longitudinal follow-up CT, mean VAT/SAT ratio change was positive in males, but negative in females. Among the 502 individuals where the VAT/SAT ratio increased at follow-up CT, 333 (66.3%) were males. Half of patients (49.6%; 786/1585) showed an interval increase in both VAT and SAT at follow-up CT. CONCLUSION: This robust, fully automated CT adiposity tool allows for both individualized and population-based assessment of visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat. Such data could be automatically derived at abdominal CT regardless of the study indication, potentially allowing for opportunistic cardiovascular risk stratification. Advances in knowledge: The CT-based adiposity tool described herein allows for fully automated measurement of visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat, which can be used for assessing cardiovascular risk, metabolic syndrome, and for change over time.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate a fully automated CT-based adiposity tool, applying it to a longitudinal adult screening cohort. METHODS: A validated automated adipose tissue segmentation algorithm was applied to non-contrast abdominal CT scans in 8852 consecutive asymptomatic adults (mean age, 57.1 years; 3926 M/4926 F) undergoing colonography screening. The tool was also applied to follow-up CT scans in a subset of 1584 individuals undergoing longitudinal surveillance (mean interval, 5.6 years). Visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT and SAT) volumes were segmented at levels T12-L5. Primary adipose results are reported herein for the L1 level as mean cross-sectional area. CT-based adipose measurements at initial CT and change over time were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean VAT values were significantly higher in males (205.8 ± 107.5 vs 108.1 ± 82.4 cm2; p < 0.001), whereas mean SAT values were significantly higher in females (171.3 ± 111.3 vs 124.3 ± 79.7 cm2; p < 0.001). The VAT/SAT ratio at L1 was three times higher in males (1.8 ± 0.7 vs 0.6 ± 0.4; p < 0.001). At longitudinal follow-up CT, mean VAT/SAT ratio change was positive in males, but negative in females. Among the 502 individuals where the VAT/SAT ratio increased at follow-up CT, 333 (66.3%) were males. Half of patients (49.6%; 786/1585) showed an interval increase in both VAT and SAT at follow-up CT. CONCLUSION: This robust, fully automated CT adiposity tool allows for both individualized and population-based assessment of visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat. Such data could be automatically derived at abdominal CT regardless of the study indication, potentially allowing for opportunistic cardiovascular risk stratification. Advances in knowledge: The CT-based adiposity tool described herein allows for fully automated measurement of visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat, which can be used for assessing cardiovascular risk, metabolic syndrome, and for change over time.
Authors: Binsheng Zhao; Jane Colville; John Kalaigian; Sean Curran; Li Jiang; Peter Kijewski; Lawrence H Schwartz Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2006 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Jeff L Fidler; Naveen S Murthy; Sundeep Khosla; Bart L Clarke; David H Bruining; David L Kopperdahl; David C Lee; Tony M Keaveny Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-07-22 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Aaroh M Parikh; Adriana M Coletta; Z Henry Yu; Gaiane M Rauch; Joey P Cheung; Laurence E Court; Ann H Klopp Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Robin F Gohmann; Batuhan Temiz; Patrick Seitz; Sebastian Gottschling; Christian Lücke; Christian Krieghoff; Christian Blume; Matthias Horn; Matthias Gutberlet Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2021-10
Authors: Nguyen K Tram; Ting-Heng Chou; Laila N Ettefagh; Kyra Deep; Adam J Bobbey; Anthony N Audino; Mitchel R Stacy Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2022-08-10 Impact factor: 7.034
Authors: Perry J Pickhardt; Peter M Graffy; Ryan Zea; Scott J Lee; Jiamin Liu; Veit Sandfort; Ronald M Summers Journal: Lancet Digit Health Date: 2020-03-02
Authors: Perry J Pickhardt; Peter M Graffy; Benjamin Weigman; Nimrod Deiss-Yehiely; Cesare Hassan; Jennifer M Weiss Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-08-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Perry J Pickhardt; Peter M Graffy; Ryan Zea; Scott J Lee; Jiamin Liu; Veit Sandfort; Ronald M Summers Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-08-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Peter M Graffy; Jiamin Liu; Perry J Pickhardt; Joseph E Burns; Jianhua Yao; Ronald M Summers Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Perry J Pickhardt; Peter M Graffy; Alberto A Perez; Meghan G Lubner; Daniel C Elton; Ronald M Summers Journal: Radiographics Date: 2021 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.333