Literature DB >> 29556587

Species translatable blood gene signature as a marker of exposure to smoking: computational approaches of the top ranked teams in the sbv IMPROVER Systems Toxicology challenge.

Ömer Sinan Saraç1, Rahul Kumar2, Sandeep Kumar Dhanda3, Ali Tuğrul Balcı1, İsmail Bilgen1, Roberto Romero4,5,6,7, Adi L Tarca8,9.   

Abstract

Crowdsourcing has been used to address computational challenges in systems biology and assess translation of findings across species. Sub-challenge 2 of the sbv IMPROVER Systems Toxicology Challenge was designed to determine whether a common set of genes can be used to identify exposure to cigarette smoke in both human and mouse. Participating teams used a training set of human and mouse blood gene expression data to derive parsimonious models (up to 40 genes) that classify subjects into exposure groups: smokers, former smokers, and never-smokers. Teams were ranked based on two classification performance metrics evaluated on a blinded test dataset. Prediction of current exposure to cigarette smoke in human and mouse by a common prediction model was achieved by the top ranked team (Team 219) with 89% balanced accuracy (BAC), while past exposure was predicted with only 57% BAC. The prediction model of the top ranked team was a random forest classifier trained on sets of genes that appeared best for each species separately with no overlap between species. By contrast, Team 264, ranked second (tied with Team 250), selected genes that were simultaneously predictive in both species and achieved 80% and 59% BAC when predicting current and past exposure, respectively. These performance values were lower than the 96.5% and 61% BAC estimates for current and past exposure, respectively, obtained by Team 264 (top ranked in sub-challenge 1) when using only human data. Unlike past exposure, current exposure to cigarette smoke can be accurately assessed in both human and mouse with a common prediction model based on blood mRNAs. However, requiring a common gene signature to be predictive in both species resulted in a substantial decrease in balanced accuracy for prediction of current exposure to cigarette smoke (from 96.5% to 80%), suggesting species-specific responses exist.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Systems toxicology; computational challenge; predictive modeling; smoking biomarker; species-translatable gene signature

Year:  2017        PMID: 29556587      PMCID: PMC5856122          DOI: 10.1016/j.comtox.2017.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Toxicol        ISSN: 2468-1113


  22 in total

1.  Frozen robust multiarray analysis (fRMA).

Authors:  Matthew N McCall; Benjamin M Bolstad; Rafael A Irizarry
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 2.  Crowdsourcing biomedical research: leveraging communities as innovation engines.

Authors:  Julio Saez-Rodriguez; James C Costello; Stephen H Friend; Michael R Kellen; Lara Mangravite; Pablo Meyer; Thea Norman; Gustavo Stolovitzky
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Sertraline induces endoplasmic reticulum stress in hepatic cells.

Authors:  Si Chen; Jiekun Xuan; Letha Couch; Advait Iyer; Yuanfeng Wu; Quan-Zhen Li; Lei Guo
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 4.221

4.  Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray.

Authors:  M Schena; D Shalon; R W Davis; P O Brown
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  HCOP: a searchable database of human orthology predictions.

Authors:  Tina A Eyre; Mathew W Wright; Michael J Lush; Elspeth A Bruford
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2006-09-02       Impact factor: 11.622

6.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

7.  Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases.

Authors:  Junhee Seok; H Shaw Warren; Alex G Cuenca; Michael N Mindrinos; Henry V Baker; Weihong Xu; Daniel R Richards; Grace P McDonald-Smith; Hong Gao; Laura Hennessy; Celeste C Finnerty; Cecilia M López; Shari Honari; Ernest E Moore; Joseph P Minei; Joseph Cuschieri; Paul E Bankey; Jeffrey L Johnson; Jason Sperry; Avery B Nathens; Timothy R Billiar; Michael A West; Marc G Jeschke; Matthew B Klein; Richard L Gamelli; Nicole S Gibran; Bernard H Brownstein; Carol Miller-Graziano; Steve E Calvano; Philip H Mason; J Perren Cobb; Laurence G Rahme; Stephen F Lowry; Ronald V Maier; Lyle L Moldawer; David N Herndon; Ronald W Davis; Wenzhong Xiao; Ronald G Tompkins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Systems toxicology: from basic research to risk assessment.

Authors:  Shana J Sturla; Alan R Boobis; Rex E FitzGerald; Julia Hoeng; Robert J Kavlock; Kristin Schirmer; Maurice Whelan; Martin F Wilks; Manuel C Peitsch
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  Understanding the limits of animal models as predictors of human biology: lessons learned from the sbv IMPROVER Species Translation Challenge.

Authors:  Kahn Rhrissorrakrai; Vincenzo Belcastro; Erhan Bilal; Raquel Norel; Carine Poussin; Carole Mathis; Rémi H J Dulize; Nikolai V Ivanov; Leonidas Alexopoulos; J Jeremy Rice; Manuel C Peitsch; Gustavo Stolovitzky; Pablo Meyer; Julia Hoeng
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 10.  Machine learning and its applications to biology.

Authors:  Adi L Tarca; Vincent J Carey; Xue-wen Chen; Roberto Romero; Sorin Drăghici
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  1 in total

1.  Targeted expression profiling by RNA-Seq improves detection of cellular dynamics during pregnancy and identifies a role for T cells in term parturition.

Authors:  Adi L Tarca; Roberto Romero; Zhonghui Xu; Nardhy Gomez-Lopez; Offer Erez; Chaur-Dong Hsu; Sonia S Hassan; Vincent J Carey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.