| Literature DB >> 29554909 |
William McCartney1, Bryan MacDonald2, Ciprian Andrei Ober3, Rubén Lostado-Lorza4, Fátima Somovilla Gómez4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Finite element analysis was used to compare fixation methods for double pelvic osteotomy (DPO). Using 3D scanning a stereolithography (stl) image was produced of a canine pelvis and this was subsequently refined in computer aided design (CAD). Using the CAD files, the images were imported in MSC Marc software to produce a working finite element (FE) model with 3 dimensional tetrahedral elements with linear shaped functions. The dimensions of a precontoured pelvic osteotomy plate with eight screws and a twisted seven screw straight plate were used to build the 2 fixations implants for the FE models. An equivalent load of 300 N was applied progressively on all FE models in order to facilitate its convergence. The load was applied in a distributed manner on the femur-hip joint contact area in order to simulate the actual behavior of the joint. The aim of the present study was to analyze the difference in stiffness and behavior under loading between a lateral vs ventral plate fixation, with unlocked screws and different gap scenarios, for stabilization of a pelvic osteotomy using finite element analysis.Entities:
Keywords: Finite element analysis; Hip dysplasia; Pelvic osteotomy
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29554909 PMCID: PMC5859441 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1416-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1FE model of pelvis proposed in which is appreciated in the osteotomy in the cortical and cancellous bone
Fig. 2a Boundary conditions applied to the FE model pelvis: load (b) and constraints (c)
Fig. 3Detail of the gap considered (a) and not considered (b)
Fig. 4DPO plate mounted in the osteotomised pelvis. Detail of the DPO plate with the eight screws mounted
Fig. 5Ventral plate mounted in the osteotomised pelvis. Detail of the ventral plate with the seven screws mounted
Fig. 6Maximum displacement obtained for the ventral plate of 7 screws without gap configuration (a) and for the DPO plate without gap configuration (b)
Fig. 7Variation of the stiffness obtained Vs. the load applied for each of the different configurations studied