Literature DB >> 30043197

AR in VR: assessing surgical augmented reality visualizations in a steerable virtual reality environment.

Julian Hettig1, Sandy Engelhardt2,3, Christian Hansen1, Gabriel Mistelbauer4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE  : Augmented reality (AR) has emerged as a promising approach to support surgeries; however, its application in real world scenarios is still very limited. Besides sophisticated registration tasks that need to be solved, surgical AR visualizations have not been studied in a standardized and comparative manner. To foster the development of future AR applications, a steerable framework is urgently needed to rapidly evaluate new visualization techniques, explore their individual parameter spaces and define relevant application scenarios. METHODS  : Inspired by its beneficial usage in the automotive industry, the underlying concept of virtual reality (VR) is capable of transforming complex real environments into controllable virtual ones. We present an interactive VR framework, called Augmented Visualization Box (AVB), in which visualizations for AR can be systematically investigated without explicitly performing an error-prone registration. As use case, a virtual laparoscopic scenario with anatomical surface models was created in a computer game engine. In a study with eleven surgeons, we analyzed this VR setting under different environmental factors and its applicability for a quantitative assessment of different AR overlay concepts. RESULTS  : According to the surgeons, the visual impression of the VR scene is mostly influenced by 2D surface details and lighting conditions. The AR evaluation shows that, depending on the visualization used and its capability to encode depth, 37% to 91% of the experts made wrong decisions, but were convinced of their correctness. These results show that surgeons have more confidence in their decisions, although they are wrong, when supported by AR visualizations. CONCLUSION  : With AVB, intraoperative situations are realistically simulated to quantitatively benchmark current AR overlay methods. Successful surgical task execution in an AR system can only be facilitated if visualizations are customized toward the surgical task.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Surgical augmented reality; Virtual reality; Visualization

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30043197     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-018-1825-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  10 in total

1.  Invisible shadow for navigation and planning in minimal invasive surgery.

Authors:  Marios Nicolaou; Adam James; Benny P L Lo; Ara Darzi; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2005

2.  Pq-space based non-photorealistic rendering for augmented reality.

Authors:  Mirna Lerotic; Adrian J Chung; George Mylonas; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2007

3.  Illustrative visualization of 3D planning models for augmented reality in liver surgery.

Authors:  Christian Hansen; Jan Wieferich; Felix Ritter; Christian Rieder; Heinz-Otto Peitgen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 4.  Virtual reality simulators and training in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Eugenia Yiannakopoulou; Nikolaos Nikiteas; Despina Perrea; Christos Tsigris
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 5.  The status of augmented reality in laparoscopic surgery as of 2016.

Authors:  Sylvain Bernhardt; Stéphane A Nicolau; Luc Soler; Christophe Doignon
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Surgeons blinded by enhanced navigation: the effect of augmented reality on attention.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dixon; Michael J Daly; Harley Chan; Allan D Vescan; Ian J Witterick; Jonathan C Irish
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  The state of the art of visualization in mixed reality image guided surgery.

Authors:  Marta Kersten-Oertel; Pierre Jannin; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.790

8.  Context-aware Augmented Reality in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Darko Katić; Anna-Laura Wekerle; Jochen Görtler; Patrick Spengler; Sebastian Bodenstedt; Sebastian Röhl; Stefan Suwelack; Hannes Götz Kenngott; Martin Wagner; Beat Peter Müller-Stich; Rüdiger Dillmann; Stefanie Speidel
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  Robust augmented reality guidance with fluorescent markers in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Esther Wild; Dogu Teber; Daniel Schmid; Tobias Simpfendörfer; Michael Müller; Ann-Christin Baranski; Hannes Kenngott; Klaus Kopka; Lena Maier-Hein
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  IMHOTEP: virtual reality framework for surgical applications.

Authors:  Micha Pfeiffer; Hannes Kenngott; Anas Preukschas; Matthias Huber; Lisa Bettscheider; Beat Müller-Stich; Stefanie Speidel
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.924

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  HEARTBEAT4D: An Open-source Toolbox for Turning 4D Cardiac CT into VR/AR.

Authors:  M Bindschadler; S Buddhe; M R Ferguson; T Jones; S D Friedman; R K Otto
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.056

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.